Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:46:03.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on lucerne and lucerne-grass leys: IV. The effect of systems of grazing management on the persistence of a lucerne-cocksfoot ley

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

M. G. Barker ,
F. Hanley  and
W. J. Ridgman
M. G. Barker
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, University of Cambridge
F. Hanley
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, University of Cambridge
W. J. Ridgman
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, University of Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Experiments to assess the effects of grazing management on the persistence of a lucerne-cocksfoot ley are described and the results discussed.

2. The work confirms the general opinion, based on other experiments in which lucerne was defoliated by cutting, that frequent defoliation causes a reduction in the persistence of the lucerne.

3. Defoliation at 8-weekly intervals maintained a satisfactory balance between the sown species in a lucerne-cocksfoot sward, irrespective of whether defoliation was by cutting or by grazing or by combination of the two.

4. Grazing at 4-weekly or 2-weekly intervals led to serious reductions in the proportion of lucerne in the sward.

5. The provision of a rest period, either early or late in the growing season, had little effect on the amount of lucerne present after 2 years on plots subjected to grazing at 4-weekly or 2-weekly intervals.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 48 , Issue 3 , February 1957 , pp. 361 - 365
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barker, M. G., Hanley, F. & Ridgman, W. J. (1955). J. Agric. Sci. 46, 362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graber, L. F., Nelson, N. T., Laukel, W. A. & Albert, W. B. (1927). Res. Bull. Wis. agric. Exp. Sta. no. 80.Google Scholar
Jones, T. (1955). Grassl. Res. Inst. Mem. no. 1, p. 53.Google Scholar
Mark, J. J. (1936). Res. Bull. Ia. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 208.Google Scholar
Rather, H. C. & Harrison, C. M. (1938). Spec. Bull. Mich. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 292.Google Scholar
Ridgman, W. J., Hanley, F. & Barker, M. G. (1956). J. Agric. Sci. 47, 50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar