Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T02:36:04.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Variation of grain nitrogen content in relation with grain yield in old and modern Spanish wheats grown under a wide range of agronomic conditions in a Mediterranean region

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2009

M. M. ACRECHE*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Forest Sciences, University of Lleida and Centre UdL-IRTA, Av. Rovira Roure 191, 25198, Lleida, Spain
G. A. SLAFER
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Forest Sciences, University of Lleida and Centre UdL-IRTA, Av. Rovira Roure 191, 25198, Lleida, Spain ICREA (Catalonian Institution for Research and Advanced Studies), Passeig Lluís Companys 23, 08010 Barcelona, Spain
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: macreche@pvcf.udl.es

Summary

Wheat yield and grain nitrogen concentration (GNC; mg N/g grain) are frequently negatively correlated. In most growing conditions, this is mainly due to a feedback process between GNC and the number of grains/m2. In Mediterranean conditions, breeders may have produced cultivars with conservative grain set. The present study aimed at clarifying the main physiological determinants of grain nitrogen accumulation (GNA) in Mediterranean wheat and to analyse how breeding has affected them. Five field experiments were carried out in north-eastern Spain in the 2005/06 and 2006/07 growing seasons with three cultivars released at different times and an advanced line. Depending on the experiment, source-sink ratios during grain filling were altered by reducing grain number/m2 either through pre-anthesis shading (unshaded control or 0·75 shading only between jointing and anthesis) or by directly trimming the spikes after anthesis and before the onset of the effective grain filling period (un-trimmed control or spikes halved 7–10 days after anthesis). Grain nitrogen content (GN content; mg N/grain) decreased with the year of release of the genotypes. As the number of grains/m2 was also increased by breeding there was a clear dilution effect on the amount of nitrogen allocated to each grain. However, the increase in GN content in old genotypes did not compensate for the loss in grain nitrogen yield (GNY) due to the lower number of grains/m2. GN content of all genotypes increased (increases ranged from 0·13 to 0·40 mg N/grain, depending on experiment and genotype) in response to the post-anthesis spike trimming or pre-anthesis shading. The degree of source-limitation for GNA increased with the year of release of the genotypes (and thus with increases in grain number/m2) from 0·22 (mean of the four manipulative experiments) in the oldest cultivar to 0·51 (mean of the four manipulative experiments) in the most modern line. It was found that final GN content depended strongly on the source-sink ratio established at anthesis between the number of grains set and the amount of nitrogen absorbed at this stage. Thus, Mediterranean wheat breeding that improved yield through increases in grain number/m2 reduced the GN content by diluting a rather limited source of nitrogen into more grains. This dilution effect produced by breeding was further confirmed by the reversal effect produced by grain number/m2 reductions due to either pre-anthesis shading or post-anthesis spike trimming.

Type
Crops and Soils
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Acevedo, E. H., Silva, P. C., Silva, H. R. & Solar, B. R. (1999). Wheat production in Mediterranean environments. In Wheat: Ecology and Physiology of Yield Determination (Eds Satorre, E. H. & Slafer, G. A.), pp. 295331. New York: The Haworth Press Inc.Google Scholar
Acreche, M. M. & Slafer, G. A. (2009). Grain weight, radiation interception and use efficiency as affected by sink-strength in Mediterranean wheats released from 1940 to 2005. Field Crops Research 110, 98–105.Google Scholar
Acreche, M. M., Briceño-Félix, G., Martín Sánchez, J. A. M. & Slafer, G. A. (2008). Physiological bases of genetic gains in Mediterranean bread wheat yield in Spain. European Journal of Agronomy 28, 162170.Google Scholar
Acreche, M. M., Briceño-Félix, G., Martín Sánchez, J. A. & Slafer, G. A. (2009). Grain number determination in an old and a modern Mediterranean wheat as affected by pre-anthesis shading. Crop and Pasture Science 60, 271279.Google Scholar
Austin, R. B., Ford, M. A., Edrich, J. A. & Blackwell, R. D. (1977). The nitrogen economy of winter wheat. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 88, 159167.Google Scholar
Austin, R. B., Bingham, J., Blackwell, R. D., Evans, L. T., Ford, R. A., Morgan, C. L. & Taylor, M. (1980). Genetic improvement in winter wheat yield since 1900 and associated physiological changes. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 94, 675689.Google Scholar
Barlow, E. W. R., Donovan, G. R. & Lee, J. W. (1983). Water relationships and composition of wheat ears grown in liquid culture: effect of carbon and nitrogen. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 10, 99–108.Google Scholar
Barneix, A. J. & Guitman, M. R. (1993). Leaf regulation of the nitrogen concentration in the grain of wheat plants. Journal of Experimental Botany 44, 16071612.Google Scholar
Benzian, B. & Lane, P. (1981). Interrelationship between nitrogen concentration in grain, grain yield and added fertilizer nitrogen in wheat experiments in south-east England. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 32, 3543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bidinger, F., Musgrave, R. B. & Fischer, R. A. (1977). Contribution of stored pre-anthesis assimilate to grain yield in wheat and barley. Nature 270, 431433.Google Scholar
Bly, A. G. & Woodward, H. J. (2003). Foliar nitrogen application timing: Influence on grain yield and grain protein concentration of hard red spring wheat. Agronomy Journal 92, 335338.Google Scholar
Borghi, B., Corbellini, M., Cattaneo, M., Fornasari, M. & Zucchelli, L. (1986). Modification of the sink/source relationships in bread wheat and its influence on grain protein content. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 157, 245254.Google Scholar
Calderini, D. F., Dreccer, M. F. & Slafer, G. A. (1995 a). Genetic improvement in wheat bread and associated traits. A re-examination of previous results and the latest trends. Plant Breeding 114, 108112.Google Scholar
Calderini, D. F., Torres-León, S. & Slafer, G. A. (1995 b). Consequences of wheat breeding on nitrogen yield, grain nitrogen and phosphorus concentration and associated traits. Annals of Botany 76, 315322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calderini, D. F., Reynolds, M. P. & Slafer, G. A. (1999). Genetic gains in wheat yield and associated physiological changes during the twentieth century. In Wheat: Ecology and Physiology of Yield Determination (Eds Satorre, E. H. & Slafer, G. A.), pp. 351377. New York: The Haworth Press Inc.Google Scholar
Canevara, M. G., Romani, M., Corbellini, M., Perenzin, M. & Borghi, B. (1994). Evolutionary trends in morphological, physiological, agronomical and qualitative traits of Triticum aestivum L. cultivars bred in Italy since 1900. European Journal of Agronomy 3, 175185.Google Scholar
Day, G. E., Paulsen, G. M. & Sears, R. G. (1985). Nitrogen relations in winter wheat cultivars differing in grain protein percentage and stature. Journal of Plant Nutrition 8, 555566.Google Scholar
Demotes-Mainard, S. & Jeuffroy, M. H. (2004). Effects of nitrogen and radiation on dry matter and nitrogen accumulation in the spike of winter wheat. Field Crops Research 87, 221233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreccer, M. F., Grashoff, C. & Rabbinge, R. (1997). Source-sink ratio in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) during grain filling: effects on senescence and grain protein concentration. Field Crops Research 49, 269277.Google Scholar
Fischer, R. A. (1993). Irrigated spring wheat and timing and amount of nitrogen fertilizer. II. Physiology of grain yield response. Field Crop Research 33, 5780.Google Scholar
Fischer, R. A. & Stockman, Y. M. (1980). Kernel number per spike in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): Responses to pre-anthesis shading. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 7, 169180.Google Scholar
Fischer, R. A. & Wall, P. C. (1976). Wheat breeding in Mexico and yield increases. Journal of the Australian Institute of Agricultural Science 42, 139148.Google Scholar
Foulkes, M. J., Sylvester-Bradley, R. & Scott, R. K. (1998). Evidence for differences between winter wheat cultivars in acquisition of soil mineral nitrogen and uptake and utilization of applied fertilizer nitrogen. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 130, 2944.Google Scholar
González, F. G., Slafer, G. A. & Miralles, D. J. (2005). Photoperiod during stem elongation in wheat: is its impact on fertile floret and grain number determination similar to that of radiation? Functional Plant Biology 32, 181188.Google Scholar
Guarda, G., Padovan, S. & Delogu, G. (2004). Grain yield, nitrogen-use efficiency and baking quality of old and modern Italian bread-wheat cultivars grown at different nitrogen levels. European Journal of Agronomy 21, 181192.Google Scholar
Heitholt, J. J., Croy, L. I., Maness, N. O. & Nguyen, H. T. (1990). Nitrogen partitioning in genotypes of winter wheat differing in grain N concentration. Field Crops Research 23, 133144.Google Scholar
Jenner, C. F. (1991). The physiology of starch and protein deposition in the endosperm of wheat. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 18, 211226.Google Scholar
Kirby, E. J. M. (1988). Analysis of leaf stem and ear growth in wheat from terminal spikelet stage at anthesis. Field Crops Research 18, 127140.Google Scholar
Koshkin, E. I. & Tararina, V. V. (1989). Yield and source/sink relations of spring wheat cultivars. Field Crops Research 22, 297306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loffler, C. M., Rauch, T. L. & Busch, R. H. (1985). Grain and plant protein relationships in hard red spring wheat. Crop Science 25, 521524.Google Scholar
Ma, Y. Z., MacKown, C. T. & Van Sanford, D. A. (1995). Kernel mass and assimilate accumulation of wheat: cultivar responses to 50% spikelet removal at anthesis. Field Crops Research 42, 9399.Google Scholar
Ma, Y. Z., MacKown, C. T. & Van Sanford, D. A. (1996). Differential effects of partial spikelet removal and defoliation on kernel growth and assimilate partitioning among wheat cultivars. Field Crops Research 47, 201209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKown, C. T., Van Sanford, D. A. & Zhang, N. (1992). Wheat vegetative nitrogen compositional changes in response to reduced reproductive sink strength. Plant Physiology 99, 14691474.Google Scholar
Martre, P., Porter, J. R., Jamieson, P. D. & Triboi, E. (2003). Modelling grain nitrogen accumulation and protein composition to understand the sink/source regulations of nitrogen remobilization for wheat. Plant Physiology 133, 19591967.Google Scholar
Mattsson, M., Lundborg, T. & Larsson, C. M. (1993). Nitrogen utilization in N-limited barley during vegetative growth: IV. Translocation and remobilization of nitrogen. Journal of Experimental Botany 44, 537546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mi, G., Tang, L., Zhang, F. & Zhang, J. (2000). Is nitrogen after anthesis in wheat regulated by sink size? Field Crops Research 68, 183190.Google Scholar
Muurinen, S., Kleemola, J. & Peltonen-Sainio, P. (2007). Accumulation and translocation of nitrogen in spring cereal cultivars differing in nitrogen use efficiency. Agronomy Journal 99, 441449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naylor, R. E. L. & Stephen, N. H. (1993). Effects of nitrogen and the plant growth regulator chlormequat on grain size, nitrogen content and amino acid composition of triticale. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 120, 159169.Google Scholar
Oury, F. X., Berard, P., Brancourt-Hulmel, M., Depatureaux, C., Doussinault, G., Galic, N., Giraud, A., Heumez, E., Lecompte, C., Pluchard, P., Rolland, B., Rousset, M. & Trottet, M. (2003). Yield and grain protein concentration in bread wheat: a review and a study of multi-annual data from a French breeding program. Journal of Genetics and Breeding 57, 5968.Google Scholar
Papakosta, D. K. & Gagianas, A. A. (1991). Nitrogen and dry matter accumulation, remobilization, and losses for Mediterranean wheat during grain filling. Agronomy Journal 83, 864870.Google Scholar
Pepe, J. F. & Heiner, R. E. (1975). Plant height, protein percentage and yield relationships in spring wheat. Crop Science 15, 793797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prystupa, P., Savin, R. & Slafer, G. A. (2004). Grain number and its relationship with dry matter, N and P in the spikes at heading in response to NxP fertilization in barley. Field Crops Research 90, 245254.Google Scholar
Radley, M. E. & Thorne, G. N. (1981). Effects of decreasing the number of grains in ears of cvs Hobbit and Maris Huntsman winter wheat. Annals of Applied Biology 98, 149156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute (2003). SAS User's Guide: Statistics, Release 9.1. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
Savin, R. & Slafer, G. A. (1991). Shading effects on the yield of an Argentinean wheat cultivar. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 116, 17.Google Scholar
Schenk, M. K. (1996). Regulation of nitrogen uptake on the whole plant level. Plant and Soil 181, 131137.Google Scholar
Shepherd, K. D., Cooper, P. J. M., Allan, A. Y., Drennan, D. S. H. & Keatinge, J. D. H. (1987). Growth, water use and yield of barley in Mediterranean-type environments. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 108, 365378.Google Scholar
Simmonds, N. W. (1996). Yields of cereal grain and protein. Experimental Agriculture 32, 351356.Google Scholar
Slafer, G. A. (2003). Genetic basis of yield as viewed from a crop physiologist's perspective. Annals of Applied Biology 142, 117128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slafer, G. A., Andrade, F. H. & Satorre, E. H. (1990). Genetic-improvement effects on pre-anthesis physiological attributes related to wheat grain-yield. Field Crops Research 23, 255263.Google Scholar
Slafer, G. A., Satorre, E. H. & Andrade, F. H. (1994). Increases in grain yield in bread wheat from breeding and associated physiological changes. In Genetic Improvement of Field Crops (Ed. Slafer, G. A.), pp. 168. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
Spiertz, J. H. J. & De Vos, N. M. (1983). Agronomical and physiological aspects of the role of nitrogen in yield formation of cereals. Plant and Soil 75, 379391.Google Scholar
Thorne, G. N. & Wood, D. W. (1987). Effects of radiation and temperature on tiller survival, grain number and grain yield in winter wheat. Annals of Botany 59, 413426.Google Scholar
Triboi, E. & Triboi-Blondel, A. M. (2002). Productivity and grain or seed composition: a new approach to an old problem-invited paper. European Journal of Agronomy 16, 163186.Google Scholar
Triboi, E., Martre, P., Girousse, C., Ravel, C. & Triboi-Blondel, A. M. (2006). Unravelling environmental and genetic relationships between grain yield and nitrogen concentration for wheat. European Journal of Agronomy 25, 108118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Sanford, D. A. & MacKown, C. T. (1987). Cultivar differences in nitrogen remobilization during grain fill in soft red winter wheat. Crop Science 27, 295300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voltas, J., Romagosa, I. & Araus, J. L. (1997). Grain size and nitrogen accumulation in sink-reduced barley under Mediterranean conditions. Field Crops Research 52, 117126.Google Scholar
Wang, Z., Yin, Y., He, M., Zhang, Y., Lu, S., Li, Q. & Shi, S. (2003). Allocation of photosynthates and grain growth of two wheat cultivars with different potential grain growth in response to pre- and post-anthesis shading. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 189, 280285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolfolk, C. W., Raun, W. R., Johnson, G. V., Thompson, W. E., Mullen, R. W., Wyn, K. J. & Freeman, K. W. (2002). Influence of late-season foliar nitrogen applications on yield and grain nitrogen in wheat. Agronomy Journal 94, 429434.Google Scholar
Wyss, C. S., Czyzewicz, J. R. & Below, F. E. (1991). Source-sink control of grain composition in maize strains divergently selected for protein concentration. Crop Science 31, 761766.Google Scholar
Zadoks, J. C., Chang, T. T. & Konzak, C. F. (1974). A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research 14, 415421.Google Scholar