Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-07T18:18:19.938Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characteristics of the switch process and geometric divisibility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 November 2023

Henrik Bengtsson*
Affiliation:
Lund University
*
*Postal address: Department of Statistics, Box 743, 220 07 Lund. Email: Henrik.Bengtsson@stat.lu.se

Abstract

The switch process alternates independently between 1 and $-1$, with the first switch to 1 occurring at the origin. The expected value function of this process is defined uniquely by the distribution of switching times. The relation between the two is implicitly described through the Laplace transform, which is difficult to use for determining if a given function is the expected value function of some switch process. We derive an explicit relation under the assumption of monotonicity of the expected value function. It is shown that geometric divisible switching time distributions correspond to a non-negative decreasing expected value function. Moreover, an explicit relation between the expected value of a switch process and the autocovariance function of the switch process stationary counterpart is obtained, leading to a new interpretation of the classical Pólya criterion for positive-definiteness.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Applied Probability Trust

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aly, E.-E. A. A. and Bouzar, N. (2000). On geometric infinite divisibility and stability. Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. 52, 790799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bray, A. J., Majumdar, S. N. and Schehr, G. (2013). Persistence and first-passage properties in nonequilibrium systems. Adv. Phys. 62, 225361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, D. R. (1962). Renewal Theory. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Daley, D. J. and Vere-Jones, D. (2003). An Introduction to the Theory of Point Processes, Vol. 1, 2nd edn. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Feller, W. (1966). An Introduction to Probability Theory and its Applications. Vol. 2. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Klebanov, L. B., Maniya, G. M. and Melamed, I. A. (1985). A problem of Zolotarev and analogs of infinitely divisible and stable distributions in a scheme for summing a random number of random variables. Theory Prob. Appl. 29, 791794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozubowski, T. (2010). Geometric infinite divisibility, stability, and self-similarity: An overview. Banach Center Publications 90, 3965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Picinbono, B. (2016). Symmetric binary random signals with given spectral properties. IEEE Trans. Sig. Proc. 64, 4952–4959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pólya, G. (1949). Remarks on characteristic functions. In Proc. 1st Berkeley Conf. Math. Statist. Prob, pp. 115123.Google Scholar
Poplavskyi, M. and Schehr, G. (2018). Exact persistence exponent for the 2D-diffusion equation and related Kac polynomials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 150601.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yannaros, N. (1988). The inverses of thinned renewal processes. J. Appl. Prob. 25, 822828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yannaros, N. (1988). On Cox processes and gamma renewal processes. J. Appl. Prob. 25, 423427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar