Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T15:27:29.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tail Asymptotics of the Supremum of a Regenerative Process

Part of: Special processes Limit theorems Applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2016

Zbigniew Palmowski  and
Bert Zwart
Zbigniew Palmowski*
Affiliation:
Utrecht University and University of Wrocław
Bert Zwart*
Affiliation:
Georgia Institute of Technology
*
∗ Postal address: Mathematical Institute, University of Wrocław, pl. Grunwaldzki 2/4, 50-384 Wrocław, Poland. Email address: zpalma@math.uni.wroc.pl
∗∗ Postal address: H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 765 Ferst Drive, Atlanta, GA 30332-0205, USA. Email address: bertzwart@gatech.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We give precise asymptotic estimates of the tail behavior of the distribution of the supremum of a process with regenerative increments. Our results cover four qualitatively different regimes involving both light tails and heavy tails, and are illustrated with examples arising in queueing theory and insurance risk.

Keywords

Cramér conditionfluid modelperturbed random walkregenerative processruin probability

MSC classification

Primary: 60F10: Large deviations 60K25: Queueing theory 62P05: Applications to actuarial sciences and financial mathematics
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Applied Probability , Volume 44 , Issue 2 , June 2007 , pp. 349 - 365
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 2007 

References

Araman, V. F. and Glynn, P. (2006). Tail asymptotics for the maximum of perturbed random walk. Ann. Appl. Prob. 16, 1411–1431.Google Scholar
Asmussen, S. (2003). Applied Probability and Queues, 2nd edn. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Asmussen, S., Schmidli, H. and Schmidt, V. (1999). Tail probabilities for non-standard risk and queueing processes with subexponential Jumps. Adv. Appl. Prob. 31, 422–447.Google Scholar
Bertoin, J. and Doney, R. (1996). Some asymptotic results for transient random walks. Adv. Appl. Prob. 28, 207–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Björk, T. and Grandell, J. (1988). Exponential inequalities for ruin probabilities in the Cox case. Scand. Actuarial J. 1988, 77–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borodin, A. N. and Salminen, P. (1996). Handbook of Brownian Motion—Facts and Formulae. Birkhäuser, Basel.Google Scholar
Cline, D. (1987). Convolution tails, product tails, and domains of attraction. Prob. Theory Relat. Fields 72, 529–557.Google Scholar
Debicki, K., Zwart, B. and Borst, S. C. (2004). The supremum of a Gaussian process over a random interval. Statist. Prob. Lett. 68, 221–234.Google Scholar
Denisov, D. and Zwart, B. (2005). On a theorem of Breiman and a class of random difference equations. Submitted.Google Scholar
Embrechts, P. and Veraverbeke, N. (1982). Estimates for the probability of ruin with special emphasis on the possibility of large claims. Insurance Math. Econom. 1, 55–72.Google Scholar
Embrechts, P., Klüppelberg, C. and Mikosch, T. (1996). Modeling Extremal Events. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
Foss, S. and Zachary, S. (2002). Asymptotics for the maximum of a modulated random walk with heavy-tailed increments. In Analytic Methods in Applied Probability (Amer. Math. Soc. Transl. Ser. 2), American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, pp. 37–52.Google Scholar
Foss, S., Konstantopoulos, T. and Zachary, S. (2005). The principle of a big Jump: discrete and continuous time modulated random walks with heavy-tailed increments. To appear in J. Theoret. Prob. Google Scholar
Goldie, C. M. (1991). Implicit renewal theory and tails of solutions of random equations. Ann. Appl. Prob. 1, 126–166.Google Scholar
Grandell, J. (1991). Aspects of Risk Theory. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Grey, D. R. (1994). Regular variation in the tail behaviour of solutions of random difference equations. Ann. Appl. Prob. 4, 169–183.Google Scholar
Heath, D., Resnick, S. and Samorodnitsky, G. (1998). Heavy tails and long range dependence in on/off processes and associated fluid models. Math. Operat. Res. 23, 145–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höglund, T. (1990). An asymptotic expression for the probability of ruin within finite time. Ann. Prob. 18, 378–389.Google Scholar
Kella, O. and Whitt, W. (1992). A storage model with a two-state random environment. Operat. Res. 40, 257–262.Google Scholar
Korshunov, D. A. (1997). On distribution tail of the maximum of a random walk. Stoch. Process. Appl. 72, 97–103.Google Scholar
Leblanc, B., Renault, O. and Scaillet, O. (2000). A correction note on the first passage time of an Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process to a boundary. Finance Stoch. 4, 109–111.Google Scholar
Palmowski, Z. (2002). Tail probabilities for a risk process with subexponential Jumps in a regenerative and diffusion environment. Prob. Math. Statist. 22, 381–405.Google Scholar
Revuz, D. and Yor, M. (1999). Continuous Martingales and Brownian Motion. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
Rolski, T., Schmidli, H., Schmidt, V. and Teugels, J. L. (1999). Stochastic Processes for Insurance and Finance. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Schmidli, H. (1997). An extension to the renewal theorem and an application to risk theory. Ann. Appl. Prob. 7, 121–133.Google Scholar
Schmock, U. (1999). Estimating the value of the WinCAT coupons of the Winterthur Insurance convertible bond. ASTIN Bull. 29, 101–163.Google Scholar
Veraverbeke, N. (1977). Asymptotic behaviour of Wiener–Hopf factors of a random walk. Stoch. Process. Appl. 5, 27–37.Google Scholar
Zachary, S. (2004). A note on Veraverbeke's theorem. Queueing Systems 46, 9–14.Google Scholar
Zwart, B., Borst, S. C. and Debicki, K. (2005). Subexponential asymptotics of hybrid fluid and ruin models. Ann. Appl. Prob. 15, 500–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar