Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T18:43:21.315Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genesis of Marriage among the Moso and Empire-Building in Late Imperial China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2010

Chuan-Kang Shih
Get access

Extract

Marriage has been widely accepted as a universal institution that allows a kinship system to establish and perpetuate itself (Levi-Strauss 1963). Although the well-known case of the Nayar in Central Kerala of India has seriously problematized the anthropological definitions of marriage (Gough 1959), the universality of the institution is still accepted up to this day (Ember and Ember 1999). Since the early 1980s, however, a growing body of literature on the Moso, a matrilineal group in Southwest China, has made available an ethnographic case in which marriage is not the primary sexual-reproductive institution (Zhan et al. 1980; Yan and Song 1983; YNSBJZ 1986, 1987, 1988; Shih 1993; Weng 1993; Guo 1997; Cai 1997). Among the Moso, the majority of adults have practiced a visiting system called tisese (pronounced as “tea-say-say”), which differs from marriage in that it is noncontractual, nonobligatory, and nonexclusive (Shih 1993). Meanwhile, mostly amongst the elites, marriage has coexisted with tisese in Moso society for centuries.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 60 , Issue 2 , May 2001 , pp. 381 - 412
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of References

Cai, Hua. 1997. Une société sans père ni mari: Les Na de Chine. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Chao, Wei Yang. 1986. “Evolutionary Theory and Cultural Diversity: A Study of the Ethnology of China’s National Minorities.” Ph.D. diss., University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Dillingham, Beth W. and Barry, L. Isaac. 1975. “Defining Marriage Cross-Culturally.” In Being Female: Reproduction, Power, and Change, edited by Raphael, Dana. The Hague: Mouton Publishers.Google Scholar
Du, Yuting and Chen, Lufan. 1979. Yunnan Mengguzu jian shi (A Brief History of the Mongolian People in Yunnan). Kunming: Yunnan remin chubanshe.Google Scholar
Ember, Carol R. and Melvin, Ember. 1999. Cultural Anthropology. 9th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Evans-Pritchard, Edward. 1951. Kinship and Marriage among the Nuer. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fang, Guoyu. 1944. “Moxie minzu kao” (Studies on the Moso). Minzuxue yanjiu jikan (Journal of Ethnological Studies), no. 4: 79–109.Google Scholar
Fang, Guoyu and He, Zhiwu. 1979. “Naxizu de yuanyuan, qianxi he fenbu” (The Origin, Migration, and Distribution of the Naxi). Minzu yanjiu (Ethnic Studies), no. 1: 33–41.Google Scholar
Fuller, Christopher J. 1976. The Nayars Today. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodenough, Ward H. 1970. Description and Comparison in Cultural Anthropology. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Gough, Kathleen. 1950. “Kinship among the Nayar of the Malabar Coast of India.” Ph.D. diss., Cambridge University.Google Scholar
Gough, Kathleen. 1952. “Changing Kinship Usages in the Setting of Political and Economic Change among the Nayars of Malabar. “Journal ofthe Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 82: 71–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gough, Kathleen. 1955. “Female Initiation Rites on the Malabar Coast.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 85: 45–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gough, Kathleen. 1959. “The Nayars and the Definition of Marriage.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 89: 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gough, Kathleen. 1961a. “Nayar: Central Kerala.” In Matrilineal Kinship, edited by Schneider, David M. and Gough, Kathleen. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gough, Kathleen. 1961b. “Nayar: North Kerala.” In Matrilineal Kinship, edited by Schneider, David M. and Gough, Kathleen. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gu Jiegang. 1980. “Cong guji zhong tansuo woguo de xibu minzu: Qiangzu” (Exploring Historical Records on an Ethnic Group in West China: The Qiang). Shehui kexue zhanxian (The Front of Social Sciences), no. 1: 117–52.Google Scholar
Guo, Xiaolin. 1997. “Rice Ears and Cattle Tails: A Comparative Study of Rural Economy and Society in Yunnan, Southwest China.” Ph.D. diss., University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Harrell, Stevan. 1995. “Introduction: Civilizing Projects and the Reaction to Them.” In Cultural Encounters on China’s Ethnic Frontiers, edited by Harrell, StevanSeattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Harrell, Stevan. 1996. “The Nationalities Question and the Prmi Problem.” In Negotiating Ethnicities in China and Taiwan, edited by Brown, Melissa J.. Berkeley: Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California.Google Scholar
Harris, Marvin. 1983. Cultural Anthropology. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
He, Jiren, and Jiang, Zhuyi. 1985. Naxiyu jianzhi (A Brief Account of the Naxi Language). Beijing: Minzu chubanshe.Google Scholar
He, Xuewen. 1991. “Yongning Mosuoren de hunyin, jiating ji xisu” (Marriage, the Family and Customs of the Yongning Moso). In Ninglang wenshi ziliao xuanji (Selected Literary and Historical Materials of Ninglang), edited by Jidian, Ma. Vol. 1. Ninglang: n.p.Google Scholar
Herman, John E. 1997. “Empire in the Southwest: Early Qing Reforms to the Native Chieftain System.” Journal of Asian Studies 56(1):47–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, Ping-Ti. 1998. “In Defense of Sinicization: A Rebuttal of Evelyn Rawski’s ’Reenvisioning the Qing.’” Journal of Asian Studies 57(1): 123–55.Google Scholar
Jackson, Anthony. 1979. Na-khi Religion: An Analytical Appraisal of the Na-khi Ritual Texts. The Hague: Mouton Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, Edmund R. 1955. “Polyandry, Inheritance, and the Definition of Marriage: With Particular Reference to Sinhalese Customary Law.” Man 55(December): 182–86.Google Scholar
Leach, Edmund R.. 1961. Preface. Rethinking Anthropology. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Levi-Strauss, Claude. 1963. Structural Anthropology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Li, Lincan. 1984. “Yongning tusi shixi” (Genealogy of the Yongning Chief.) Moxie yanjiu luntuen ji (Essays in Moxie Studies). Taipei: National Palace Museum.Google Scholar
Li, Shaoming. 1983. “Chuan Dian bianjing Nariren de zubie wenti” (The Problem of the Ethnic Identity of the Nari People on the Border between Sichuan and Yunnan). In Minzu yanjiu lunwen xuan (Selected Essays in Ethnic Studies), edited by Yanjiusuo, Sichuansheng Minzu (Sichuan Provincial Institute for Ethnic Studies). Chengdu: Sichuansheng Minzu Yanjiusuo.Google Scholar
Lo, Ch’ang-P’ei. 1945. “The Genealogical Patronymic Linkage System of the Tibeto-Burman Speaking Tribes.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 8(1944–45):349–63.Google Scholar
Luo, Changpei. 1989. Yuyan yu wenhua (Language and Culture). Beijing: Yuwen chubanshe.Google Scholar
Luosangyishi, and Ma, Jidian. 1995. Nuerguo dansheng de huofo: Luosangyishi huofo huiyilu (A Living Buddha Born in the Girl’s Land: Memoire of His Eminence Luosangyishi). Dictated by His Eminence Luosangyishi, recorded and edited by Jidian, Ma. Kunming: Yunnan minzu chubanshe.Google Scholar
Maine, Henry. {1861} 1864. Ancient Law: Its Connection with the Early History of Society and Its Relations to Modern Ideas. New York: Charles Scribner.Google Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1930. “Parenthood: The Basis of Social Structure.” In The New Generation, edited by Calverston, V.F. and Schmalhausen, Samuel D.. New York: Macauley.Google Scholar
Mencher, Joan. 1965. “The Nayars of South Malabar.” In Comparative Family Systems, edited by Nimkoff, Meyer F.. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Menon, Shanti. 1996. “Male Authority and Female Autonomy: A Study of the Matrilineal Nayars of Kerala, South India.” In Gender, Kinship, Power: A Comparative and Interdisciplinary History, edited by Maynes, Mary Jo and Waltner, Ann. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moore, Melinda A. 1985. “A New Look at the Nayar Taravad.” Man 20(3):523–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Lewis Henry. {1877} 1963. Ancient Society. Cleveland: World Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Nakane, Chie. 1963. “The Nayar Family in a Disintegrating Martilineal System.” In Family and Marriage: International Studies in Sociology and Social Anthropology, vol. 1, edited by Mogey, John. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
NLXZBWH (Compiling Committee of Gazetteer of Ninglang Yi Autonomous County). 1993. Ninglang Yizu zizhixian zhi (Gazetteer of Ninglang Yi Autonomous County). Kunming: Yunnan minzu chubanshe.Google Scholar
Raigbi, (Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland). 1951. Notes and Queries on Anthropology. 6th ed. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Rawski, Evelyn S. 1996. “Reenvisioning the Qing: The Significance of the Qing Period in Chinese History.” Journal of Asian Studies 55(4): 829–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rock, Joseph F. 1947. The Ancient Na-Khi Kingdom of Southwest China. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
She, Yize. 1947. Zhongguo tusi zhidu (The Native Chieftain System of China). Shanghai: Zhongzheng shuju.Google Scholar
Shih, Chuan-Kang. 1993. “The Yongning Moso: Sexual Union, Household Organization, Gender, and Ethnicity in a Matrilineal Duolocal Society in Southwest China.” Ph.D. diss., Stanford University.Google Scholar
Shih, Chuan-Kang. 1998. “Mortuary Rituals and Symbols among the Moso.” In Naxi and Moso Ethnography: Kin, Rites, Pictographs, edited by Oppitz, Michael and Hsu, Elisabeth. Zurich: Volkerkundemuseum Zurich.Google Scholar
Shih, Chuan-Kang. 2000. “Tisese and Its Anthropological Significance: Issues around the Visiting Sexual System among the Moso.” 697–712L’Homme, 154–55 (avril-septembre):.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shih, Chuan-Kang. Forthcoming. Quest for Harmony: The Moso Systems of Sexual Union and Household Organization. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Song, Enchang and Niyabagul, . 1987. “Ninglang xian Yongning qu Naxizu shehui ji jiating xingtai diaocha” (An Investigation Report on the Social and Family Forms in Yongning District of Ninglang County). In Ninglang Yizu zizhixian Naxizu shehui ji jiating xingtai diaocha (Investigation Reports on the Social and Family Forms of the Naxi People in the Ninglang Yi Autonomous County), edited by Bianji Zu, Yunnan Sheng (Yunnan Provincial Editorial Group). Kunming: Yunnan renmin chubanshe.Google Scholar
Sutton, S. B. 1974. In China’s Border Provinces: The Turbulent Career of Joseph Rock, Botanist-Explorer. New York: Hastings House.Google Scholar
Wang, Chengquan. 1989. “Ye lun Yongning Naxi muxizhi he Azhuhun de qiyuan: Jian da Zhao Weiyang xiansheng” (Also on the Origin of the Matrilineal System and Azhu Marriage among the Yongning Naxi: A Response to Mr. Zhao Weiyang). Yunnan shehui kexue (Yunnan Social Sciences), no. 4: 64–75.Google Scholar
Wang, Ming-Ke. 1992. “The Ch’iang of Ancient China through the Han Dynasty: Ecological Frontiers and Ethnic Boundaries.” Ph.D. diss., Harvard University.Google Scholar
Wang, Ming-Ke. 1997. “Hanzu bianyuan de Qiangzu jiyi yu Qiangzu benzhi” (The Qiang Memory and the Qiang Essence in the Periphery of the Han). In Cong zhoubian kan Hanren de shehui yu wenhua (A View of Chinese Society and Culture from the Periphery), edited by Huang, Ying-kuei and Yeh, Chuen-rong. Taipei: Institute of Ethnology, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Weng, Naiqun. 1993. “The Mother House: The Symbolism and Practice of Gender among the Naze in Southwest China.” Ph.D. diss., University of Rochester.Google Scholar
Wu, Yongzhang. 1988. Zhongguo tusi zhidu yuanyuan yu fazhan shi (A History of the Origin and Development of the Chinese Native Chieftain System). Chengdu: Sichuan minzu chubanshe.Google Scholar
Jieshun, Xu and Rike, Wei, eds. 1992. Zhongguo minzu zhengce shi jian (A History of Chinese Ethnic Policy). Nanning: Guangxi remin chubanshe.Google Scholar
Yan, Ruxian. 1991. “Zhongguoren de xingming: Pumi zu” (Names of the Chinese Peoples: The Pumi). In Zhongguoren de xingming (Names ofthe Chinese Peoples), edited by Lianfang, Zhang. Beijing: Zhongguo Shehuikexue chubanshe.Google Scholar
Yan, Ruxian and Liu, Yaohan. 1986. “Yongning Wenquan xiang Naxizu muxi zhi ji lingzhu jingji diaocha” (An Investigation Report on the Matrilineal System and Suzerain Economy of the Naxi People in Wenquan Xiang of Yongning). In Yongning Naxizu shehui ji muxi zhi diaocha (Investigation Reports on the Social and Matrilineal Systems of the Naxi People in Yongning), edited by Bianji Zu, Yunnan Sheng (Yunnan Provincial Editorial Group). Kunming: Yunnan remin chubanshe.Google Scholar
Yan, Ruxian and Song, Zhaolin. 1983. Yongning Naxizu de muxi zhi (The Matrilineal System of the Yongning Naxi). Kunming: Yunnan renmin chubanshe.Google Scholar
YNSBJZ (Editorial Team of Yunnan Province), ed. 1986. Yongning Naxizu shehui ji muxizhi diaocha (Investigation Reports on the Society and Matrilineal System of the Yongning Naxi). Kunming: Yunnan renmin chubanshe.Google Scholar
YNSBJZ (Editorial Team of Yunnan Province), ed. 1987. Ninglang Yizu zizhixian Naxizu shehui ji Jiating xingtai diaocha (Investigation Reports on the Social and Family Patterns of the Naxi in the Ninglang Yi Autonomous County). Kunming: Yunnan renmin chubanshe.Google Scholar
YNSBJZ (Editorial Team of Yunnan Province), ed. 1988. Ninglang Yizu zizhixian Yongning Naxizu shehuiji qi muxizhi diaocha (Investigation Reports on the Society and Its Matrilineal System of the Yongning Naxi in the Ninglang Yi Autonomous County). Kunming: Yunnan renmin chubanshe.Google Scholar
Zhan, Chengxu, et al. 1980. Yongning Naxizu de Azhu hunyin he muxi jiating (The Azhu Marriage and Matrilineal Family of the Yongning Naxi). Shanghai: Shanghai renmin chubanshe.Google Scholar
Zhao, Weiyang. 1987. “Yongning Naxi muxizhi he Azhuhun qiyuan wenti shangque” (Discussing the Questions of the Origin of the Matrilineal System and Azhu Marriage among the Yongning Naxi). Yunnan shehui kexue (Yunnan Social Sciences), no. 2:39–45, 95.Google Scholar
Zhou, Rucheng. 1986. “Yongning jianwen lu” (An Account of What I Saw and Heard in Yongning). In Naxizu shehui lishi diaocha (Investigation Reports on Social History of the Naxi People, No. 2), edited by Bianji Zu, Yunnan Sheng (Yunnan Provincial Editorial Group). Kunming: Yunnan minzu chubanshe.Google Scholar