Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T18:39:20.382Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hindu Eschatology and the Indian Caste System: An Example of Structural Reversal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2011

Murray Milner Jr.
Get access

Extract

Virtually all interpreters of Hinduism agree that the notions of samsara, karma, and moksa are central to nearly all varieties of Hinduism. That is, it is agreed that most Hindus assume continuing reincarnations (samsara), that a person's current incarnation and experiences are, at least in part, the fruit of past actions (karma), and that release or liberation (moksa) from this ongoing cycle is possible and desirable. As David Kinsley (1982:8) says, “certain underlying beliefs are accepted by most Hindus: karma, samsara, and moksa, for example.” J. L. Brockington (1981:5) notes, “Doctrines concerning … samsara, karma and moksa … may be regarded as axiomatic by most schools of Hindu philosophy.” Thomas Hopkins (1971:50) observes, “By the early sixth century B.C.E., transmigration and the “law of karma” had been generally accepted as basic facts of existence and were rarely challenged from that time on by any major Indian system of thought.” According to A. L. Basham (1989:42): “These [karma and samsara] are the beliefs of nearly all Indians, other than Muslims, Christians, and Parsis, down to the present day.”

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 52 , Issue 2 , May 1993 , pp. 298 - 319
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of References

Babb, Lawrence A. 1986. Redemptive Encounters: Three Modern Styles in the Hindu Tradition. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bailey, F. G. 1957. Caste and the Economic Frontier. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Basham, A. L. 1989. The Origins and Development of Classical Hinduism, Zysk, Kenneth G., ed. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Beck, Brenda E. F. 1972. Peasant Society in Konku. A Study of Right and Left Subcaste in South India. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Berger, Peter L. 1967. The Sacred Canopy. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Béteille, André. 1971. Caste, Class, and Power. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bhattacharyya, Sibajiban. 1987. “Indian Philosophies.” In Eliade, Mircea, ed., Encyclopedia of Religion, 7:163–68. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Biardeau, Madeleine. 1989. Hinduism: The Anthropology of a Civilization, Nice, Richard, trans. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brockington, J. L. 1981. The Sacred Thread. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Buhler, G., trans. 1964. The Laws of Manu. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass. [Original English edition 1886, Oxford: The Clarendon Press.]Google Scholar
Carman, John. 1974. The Theology of Ramanuja. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Chaturvedi, Badrinath. 1986. “Max Weber's Wrong Understanding of Indian Civilization.” In Kantowsky, Detlef, ed., Recent Research on Max Weber's Studies of Hinduism. Munchen: Weltforum Verlag, pp. 45–58.Google Scholar
Daniel, Sheryl B. 1983. “The Tool Box Approach of the Tamil to the Issues of Moral Responsibility and Human Destiny.” In Keyes, Charles F. and Daniel, E. Valentine, eds., Karma: An Anthropological Inquiry. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Das, Veena. 1982. Structure and Cognition: Aspects of Hindu Caste and Ritual. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dirks, Nicholas B. 1987. The Hollow Crown: Ethnohistory of an Indian Kingdom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dumont, Louis. 1970. “A Structural Definition of a Folk Deity of Tamil Nad: Aiyanar, the Lord.” In Religion/Politics and History in India. Collected Papers in Indian Sociology. Paris, The Hague: Mouton Publishers.Google Scholar
Dumont, Louis. 1980. Homo Hierarchicus. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dumont, Louis. 1986. Essays on Individualism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Esnoul, A. M. 1987. “Moksa.” In Eliade, Mircea, ed., Encyclopedia of Religion 10:28–29. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Etzioni, Amitai. 1988. The Moral Dimension. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Fuller, C. J. 1979. “Goods, Priests and Purity: On the Relation between Hinduism and the Caste System.” Man (N.S.) 14:3:459–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1979. Central Problems in Sociological Theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heesterman, J. C. 1985. The Inner Conflict of Tradition: Essays in Indian Ritual, Kingship, and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hiltebeitel, Alf. 1987. “Hinduism.” In Eliade, Mircea, ed., Encyclopedia of Religion, 6:336–60.Google Scholar
Hopkins, Thomas J. 1971. The Hindu Religious Tradition. Encino, Calif.: Dickenson Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Inden, Ronald. 1986. “Orientalist Construction of India.” Modern Asian Studies 20,3:401–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jay, Martin. 1984. Marxism and Totality: The Adventures of a Concept from Lukacs to Habermas. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kane, P. V. 1977. History of the Dharmasastras. Poona: Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, Vol. 5, Part ii.Google Scholar
Keyes, Charles F., and Daniel, E. Valentine. 1983. Karma: An Anthropological Inquiry. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Khare, R. S. 1978. “Structuralism in India: Some Issues and Observations.” Contributions to Indian Sociology (N.S.) 12:2:(July-December):253–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinsley, David R. 1982. Hinduism: A Cultural Perspective. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Kolenda, Pauline. 1984. Caste in Contemporary India. Jaipur: Rawat Publications.Google Scholar
Lang, Graeme. 1989. “The Sociology of Heaven and Hell: Afterlife Imagery as Ideology.”A paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the Society for the Scientific Study of Religion,Salt Lake City, Utah,October 27–29, 1989.Google Scholar
Leach, Edmund. 1974. Claude Levi-Strauss. Revised Edition. New York: The Viking Press.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1963. Structural Anthropology. New York: Basic Books, Harper Torchbooks.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1966. The Savage Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1969. The Raw and the Cooked. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Lukacs, Georg. 1971. History and Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectics. Translated by Livingstone, Rodney. London: Merlin Press. [Original edition 1922; preface to the new edition 1967.]Google Scholar
Madan, T. N. 1987'. Non-Renunciation: Themes and Interpretations of Hindu Culture. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mahony, William. 1987. “Karman.” In Eliade, Mircea, ed., Encyclopedia of Religion 8:261–66. New York: The Macmillan Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Mandelbaum, David. 1970. Society in India. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Marriott, McKim. 1976. “Hindu Transactions: Diversity without Dualism.” In Kapferer, Bruce, ed., Transaction and Meaning. Philadelphia: ISHI Publications.Google Scholar
Marriott, McKim. 1989. “Constructing an Indian Ethnosociology.” Contributions to Indian Sociology (N.S.) 23.1:1–39.Google Scholar
Mayer, Adrian. 1960. Caste and Kinship in Central India. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Milner, Murray Jr. 1987. “Dirt and Development in India.” The Virginia Quarterly Review 63.1(Winter): 54–71.Google Scholar
Milner, Murray Jr. 1988. “Status Relations in South Asian Marriage Alliances: Toward a General Theory.” Contributions to Indian Sociology (N.S.) 22.2:145–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moffatt, Michael. 1979. An Untouchable Community in South India. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
O'Flaherty, Wendy, ed. 1980. Karma and Rebirth in Classical Indian Traditions. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Obeyesekere, Gananath. 1968. “Theodicy, Sin and Salvation in a Sociology of Buddhism.” In Leach, E. R., ed., Dialectic in Practical Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 7–40.Google Scholar
Obeyesekere, Gananath. 1980. “Rebirth Eschatology and Its Transformation.” In O'Flaherty 1980.Google Scholar
Parry, Jonathan P. 1979. Caste and Kinship in Kangra. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Parry, Jonathan P. 1980. “Ghosts, Greed and Sin: The Occupational Identity of the Benares Funeral Priests.” Man (N.S.) 15.1(March): 88–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parry, Jonathan P. 1985. “Death and Digestion: The Symbolism of Food and Eating in North Indian Mortuary Rites.” Man (N.S.) 20.4(December):612–30.Google Scholar
Parry, Jonathan P. 1986. “The Gift, The Indian Gift and The ‘Indian Gift.’” Man (N.S.) 21.3(September):453–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pocock, D. F. 1972. Kanbi and Patidar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Potter, Karl H. 1980. “The Karma Theory and Its Interpretation in Some Indian Philosophical Systems.” In O'Flaherty 1980.Google Scholar
Rossi, Ino, ed. 1974. The Unconscious in Culture: The Structuralism of Claude Levi-Strauss in Perspective. New York: E. P. Dutton and Co.Google Scholar
Raheja, Gloria Goodwin. 1988. The Poison in the Gift. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Shah, A. M. 1982. “Division and Hierarchy: An Over View of Caste in Gujarat.” Contributions to Indian Sociology (N.S.) 16:1–33.Google Scholar
Srinivas, M. N. 1972. Social Change in Modern India. Bombay: Orient Longman [1966].Google Scholar
Srinivas, M. N. 1976. The Remembered Village. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Srinivas, M. N. 1984. “Some Reflections on the Nature of Caste Hierarchy.” Contributions to Indian Sociology (N.S.) 18.2:151–68.Google Scholar
Stark, Rodney, and Bainbridge, William. 1980. “Towards a Theory of Religion: Religious Commitment.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 19:114–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, Rodney, and Bainbridge, William. 1985. The Future of Religion. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Van der Veer, Peter. 1988. Gods on Earth. London: The Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Wallis, Roy, and Bruce, Steve. 1984. “The Stark-Bainbridge Theory of Religion: A Critical Analysis and Counter Proposal.” Sociological Analysis 45.1:11–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Max. 1946. “The Social Psychology of the World Religions.” From Max Weber, Gerth, Hans, and Mills, C. Wright, eds. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 269–70. [Introduction to “Economic Ethic of the World Religions.” Archiv fur Sozial wissenschaft und Sozial politik, 1916–19.]Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1958. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, Parsons, Talcott, trans. New York: Scribners.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1968. Economy and Society, Roth, Guenther and Wittich, Claus, eds. New York: Bedminster Press [1920].Google Scholar
Werblowsky, R. J. Zwi. 1987. “Eschatology: An Overview.” In Eliade, Mircea, ed., Encyclopedia of Religion 5:148–51. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar