Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T01:35:22.031Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Modern China and Global Futures in C. A. Bayly's Vision of Twentieth-Century History

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 August 2019

R. Bin Wong*
Affiliation:
R. Bin Wong (wong@history.ucla.edu) is Distinguished Professor of History at UCLA.
Get access

Extract

Commenting on Christopher Bayly's Remaking the Modern World, 1900–2015 is a bittersweet exercise. My assignment for this forum is to consider Remaking the Modern World, 1900–2015 from the vantage point of China studies. I will do so by framing my remarks with respect to some of the ways this major South Asia historian took his expertise into larger projects, the last of which is the volume under discussion.

Type
Forum—C. A. Bayly's Remaking the Modern World, 1900–2015: Interpretations from Asian Studies
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Bayly, C. A., Remaking the Modern World, 1900–2015: Global Connections and Comparisons (Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley Blackwell, 2018)Google Scholar.

2 Ocko, Jonathan K. and Gilmartin, David, “State, Sovereignty, and the People: A Comparison of the ‘Rule of Law’ in China and India,” Journal of Asian Studies 68, no. 1 (2009): 55100CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Rublack, Ulinka, ed., A Concise Companion to History (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar; Bayly, C. A., Rao, Vijayendra, Szreter, Simon, and Woolcock, Michael, eds. History, Historians and Development Policy: A Necessary Dialogue (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2011)Google Scholar.

4 Bayly, C. A., The Birth of the Modern World, 1780–1914 (Oxford: Blackwell, 2003), 5Google Scholar.

5 Ibid., 6–7.

6 Drèze, Jean and Sen, Amartya, Hunger and Public Action (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989), 204–25Google Scholar.

7 Kueh, Y. Y., “Mao and Agriculture in China's Industrialization: Three Antitheses in a 50-Year Perspective,” China Quarterly 187 (2006): 700723CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Perkins, Dwight H., “Research on the Economy of the People's Republic of China: A Survey of the Field,” Journal of Asian Studies 42, no. 2 (1983): 345–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Riskin, Carl, China's Political Economy: The Quest for Development since 1949 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987)Google Scholar.

8 Acemoglu, Daron, Johnson, Simon, and Robinson, James A., “The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation,” American Economic Review 91, no. 5 (2001): 13691402CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 Bayly, C. A., “Indigenous and Colonial Origins of Comparative Economic Development: The Case of Colonial India and Africa,” in History, Historians and Development Policy: A Necessary Dialogue, eds. Bayly, C. A., Rao, Vijayendra, Szreter, Simon, and Woolcock, Michael (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2011), 42Google Scholar.

10 Ibid., 59.

11 deLisle, Jacques and Goldstein, Avery, eds., China's Global Engagement: Cooperation, Competition, and Influence in the 21st Century (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 2017)Google Scholar; Jenkins, Rhys, How China Is Reshaping the Global Economy: Development Impacts in Africa and Latin America (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019)Google Scholar; Lin, Justin Yifu and Wang, Yan, Going Beyond Aid: Development Cooperation for Structural Transformation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.