Last updated 09/07/24: Online ordering is currently unavailable due to technical issues. We apologise for any delays responding to customers while we resolve this. For further updates please visit our website: https://www.cambridge.org/news-and-insights/technical-incident
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 March 2011
Even under the best of circumstances, “religion” can be a slippery term. In Buddhist Sri Lanka (Ceylon), it is especially so. Anthropologists recognize a religious complex that includes spirit exorcism as well as orthodox Buddhism; yet in Sinhalese usage, the word for religion, agama, applies to the latter but specifically excludes the former. On the other hand, from a Western perspective, orthodox “doctrinal” Buddhism—rationalistic, atheistic, non-supernatural—hardly seems to qualify as religion by any ordinary definition of the English word or its European equivalents. Indeed, that has, historically, been one of the strong appeals of Buddhism to the West. However, the terminological problem is not a vital one. Though it is well to keep in mind the indigenous distinctions, the various beliefs and practices of Sinhalese Buddhists so blend into one another and are so overtly connected, ritually and ideologically, that they present themselves as an identifiable complex that has been conventionally and justifiably called “religious.”
1 Gombrich, Richard F., Precept and Practice, Traditional Buddhism in the Rural Highlands of Ceylon (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1971), pp. 150–51.Google Scholar
2 Buddhism and Society, New York: Harper & Row, 1970Google Scholar.
3 Cf. Gombrich, , “Buddhist Karma and Social Control,” Comparative Studies in Society and History, XVII (1975), pp. 212–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
4 “Theism” is admittedly an awkward term, but “deva-ism” or the like would be even clumsier. Needless to say, the word is intended to refer simply—without any Western or Christian connotations—to that aspect of Buddhist religious belief and practice which is directed to the Buddhist gods.
5 Wirz, Paul, Exorcism and the Art of Healing in Ceylon, Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1954.Google Scholar
6 Ames, Michael M., “Ritual Prestations and the Structure of the Sinhalese Pantheon” in Nash, Manning et al. , Anthropological Studies in Theravada Buddhism (Yale Univ. SE Asia Studies Cultural Report 13), 1966, pp. 27–50.Google Scholar
7 “Buddha and the Dancing Goblins: A Theory of Magic and Religion,” American Anthropologist, LXVI (1964), pp. 75–82Google Scholar.
8 Gooneratne, Dandris De Silva, “On Demonology and Witchcraft in Ceylon,” Journal of the Ceylon Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, V (1865/1866), pp. 5–7.Google Scholar
9 “The Structure of Sinhalese Healing Rituals” in Harper, E.B. (ed.), Religion in South Asia (Seattle: Univ. of Washington Press, 1964), p. 138Google Scholar
10 “Magical-Animism and Buddhism: A Structural Analysis of the Sinhalese Religious System” in ibid., p. 41.
11 “The Great Tradition and the Little in the Perspective of Sinhalese Buddhism”, Journal of Asian Studies, XXII (1963), pp. 151–52.Google Scholar
12 Monks, Priests and Peasants A Study of Buddhism and Social Structure in Central Ceylon, Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1972Google Scholar
13 “Pulleyar and the Lord Buddha: An Aspect of Religious Syncretism in Ceylon”, Psychoanalysis and the Psychoanalytic Review, XLIX (1962), pp. 80–102.Google Scholar
14 “Transcendental and Pragmatic Aspects of Religion,” American Anthropologist, LXVIII (1966), pp. 1174–91.Google Scholar
15 Canonically, according to Gombrich (n. 1 above, p. 205), pirit is meant to mollify the demons. Obeyesekere records from a sanniyakuma ritual the statement that pirit has the power to banish disease; “The Ritual Drama of the Sanni Demons: Collective Representations of Disease in Ceylon,” Comparative Studies in Society and History, XI (1969), p. 187.
16 [Orig. 1681], An Historical Relation of Ceylon (Dehiwala, Ceylon: Tisara Prakasakayo, 1966), p. 148.Google Scholar
17 See Gombrich (n. 1 above), pp. 58, 155–56 for critical remarks.
18 Evers (n. 12 above), p. 105.
18 Ibid., p. 58.
20 Buddhism, Its Essence and Development, Oxford: Bruno Cassirer, 1957.Google Scholar
21 A remarkable example of rationalization or “Buddhicization” (Gombrich): it tells how the Buddha long ago authorized the demons to torment humans, but bound them to desist when propitiated by suitable offerings; Obeyesekere (n. 11 above), p. 145. In some performances of the sanniyakuma, the final banishment of the possessing demon is done by explicit invocation of the Buddha's authority while a picture of the Buddha is held before the patient.
22 Ibid., p. 140.
23 Peasant Society and Culture (Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1956), pp. 40ff.Google Scholar
24 Precept and Practice (n. 1 above); cf. Rahula, Walpola (Wijayasurendra, K. P. G., trans.), The Heritage of the Bhikkhu, New York: Grove Press, 1974Google Scholar.
25 The Savage Mind (London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson, 1966), p. 269.Google Scholar
26 Obeyesekere (n. 11 above), pp. 151ff.
27 For an excellent review and bibliography, see Cole, Michael and Scribner, Sylvia, Culture and Thought (New York: John Wiley, 1974).Google Scholar
28 Ibid., p. 24.
