Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T04:04:19.079Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

CONSANGUINITY ON ROBINSON CRUSOE ISLAND, AN ISOLATED CHILEAN POPULATION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 August 2013

PIA VILLANUEVA*
Affiliation:
Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Dentomaxillary Orthopedics, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile School of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile Doctoral Program of Psychology, Graduate School, University of Granada, Spain
MARIA A. FERNÁNDEZ
Affiliation:
School of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile
ZULEMA DE BARBIERI
Affiliation:
School of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile
HERNÁN PALOMINO
Affiliation:
Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile
*
1Corresponding author. Email: piavilla@u.uchile.cl

Summary

The population of Robinson Crusoe Island is estimated at 633 inhabitants. The current population has a common origin from the first eight families who colonized the island at the end of the 19th century. The objective of this study was to determine the rates of consanguinity, the average coefficients of inbreeding, the types of consanguineous marriages and the inbreeding evolution between 1900 and 2000 on the island. All marriages registered on the island, from the last colonization until 2000 (417 in total), were included in the analysis. In addition, extended genealogies were obtained. The consanguinity rate was 14.9% and the average coefficient of inbreeding (α) 54.05×10–4. The most frequent type of consanguineous marriages was between second cousins, followed by first cousins. The average value of the first/second cousin ratio was 1.11. The population of Robinson Crusoe Island has a high rate of inbreeding. The unique characteristic of the island – its small current population, originating from just a few families, with small rate of gene flow – could explain the observed high and increasing consanguinity.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blanco, R. & Chakraborty, R. (1975) Consanguinity and demography in some Chilean Population. Human Heredity 25, 477487.Google Scholar
Blanco, R. & Covarrubias, E. (1971) Estudio genético en Caleu. Revista Médica de Chile 99, 139144.Google ScholarPubMed
Blanco Villegas, M. J. & Fuster, V. (2006) Reproductive pattern in consanguineous and non-consanguineous marriages in La Cabrera, Spain. Annals of Human Biology 33, 330341.Google Scholar
Brinck, G. (2005) Memorias insulares. Archipiélago Juan Fernández. Azapa.Google Scholar
Cavalli-Sforza, L. & Bodmer, W. F. (1971) The Genetics of Human Populations. Freeman and Co., San Francisco.Google Scholar
Champin, J., Rothhammer, F., Blanco, R. & Palomino, H. (1976) Consanguinidad en poblaciones chilenas. Revista Médica de Chile 104, 202206.Google Scholar
Cohen, T., Vardi-Saliternik, R. & Friedlander, Y. (2004) Consanguinity, intracommunity and intercommunity marriages in a population sample of Israel Jews. Annals of Human Biology 31, 3848.Google Scholar
Cruz-Coke, M. (1989) The genes of Easter Islanders. Revista Médica de Chile 117, 685694.Google Scholar
De Barbieri, Z., Maggiolo, M. & Alfaro, S. (1999) Trastornos de la comunicación oral en niños que asisten a control de salud en un consultorio de atención primaria. Revista Chilena de Pediatría 70, 3640.Google Scholar
El-Kheshen, G. & Saadat, M. (2013) Prevalence of consanguineous marriages among Shi'a populations of Lebanon. Journal of Biosocial Science 10, 18.Google Scholar
Haldane, J. B. S. & Moshinsky, P. (1939) Inbreeding in Mendelian populations with special reference to human cousin marriages. Annals of Eugenics 9, 321340.Google Scholar
INE Instituto Nacional de estadísticas (2002) Censo 2002. REDATAM. URL: www.INE.cl.Google Scholar
Law, J., Boyle, J., Harris, F., Harkness, A. & Nye, C. (2000) Prevalence and natural history of primary speech and language delay: findings from a systematic review of the literature. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 42, 190200.Google Scholar
Machado, T. M., Bomfim, T. F., Souza, L. V., Soares, N., Santos, F. L., Acosta, A. X. & Abe-Sandes, K. (2013a) Types of marriages, population structure and genetic disease. Journal of Biosocial Science 45, 461470.Google Scholar
Machado, T. M., Bomfim, T. F., Souza, L. V., Soares, N., Santos, F. L., Acosta, A. X. & Abe-Sandes, K. (2013b) Types of marriages, population structure and genetic disease – Erratum. Journal of Biosocial Science 45, 575.Google Scholar
Orellana, M., Medina, A., Morel, T., Ruh, M., Hernández, R. & Monleón, J. (1975) Las islas de Juan Fernández. Depto de Ciencias Antropológicas y Arqueológicas, University of Chile, Santiago.Google Scholar
Patton, M. A. (2005) Genetics studies in the Amish community. Annals of Human Biology 32, 163167.Google Scholar
Quezada, M. & Barrantes, R. (1973) Análisis de la endogamia en una población chilena. Revista Médica de Chile 101, 227230.Google Scholar
Rothhammer, R. & Llop, E. (2004) Poblaciones chilenas cuatro décadas de investigaciones bioantropológicas. Editorial Universitaria, Santiago.Google Scholar
Schnyder, J. O. (2004) Juan Fernández – El tesoro de Chile. Editorial Cumberland, Santiago.Google Scholar
Serre, J. L. & Babron, M. C. (1985) Polymorphism and genetic evolution in an isolate in the Antilles: Saint-Barthelemy. Annals of Human Biology 12, 413419.Google Scholar
Shriberg, L. D., Tomblin, J. B. & McSweeny, J. L. (1999) Prevalence of speech delay in 6-year-old children and comorbidity with language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 42, 14611481.Google Scholar
Tomblin, J. B., Records, N. L., Buckwalter, P. R., Zhang, X., Smith, E. & O'Brien, M. (1997a) Prevalence of specific language impairment in kindergarten children. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 40, 12451260.Google Scholar
Tomblin, J. B., Smith, E. & Zhang, X. (1997b) Epidemiology of specific language impairment: prenatal and perinatal risk factors. Journal of Communication Disorders 30, 325344.Google Scholar
Varela, T. A., Ainsua, R. L. & Fariña, J. (2001) Evolution of consanguinity in Bishopric of Lugo (Spain) from 1900 to 1979. Annals of Human Biology 28, 575588.Google Scholar
Vicuña Mackenna, B. (1883) Juan Fernández. Historia verdadera de la isla Robinson Crusoe. Rafael Jover, Santiago.Google Scholar
Villanueva, P., De Barbieri, Z., Palomino, H. M. & Palomino, H. (2008) High prevalence of specific language impairment in Robinson Crusoe Island. A possible founder effect. Revista Médica de Chile 136, 186192.Google Scholar
Villanueva, P., Jara, L. & Palomino, H. (2010) Association of D16S515 microsatellite with specific language impairment on Robinson Crusoe Island, an isolated Chilean population: a possible key to understanding language development. Human Biology 82, 395408.Google Scholar
Villanueva, P., Newbury, D. F., Jara, L., De Barbieri, Z., Mira, G., Palomino, H. M., Fernández, M. A.et al. (2011) Genome wide analysis of genetic susceptibility to language impairment in a isolated Chilean population. European Journal of Human Genetics 19, 687695.Google Scholar
Villarroel, H., Lazo, B., Campusano, C., Pinto-Cisternas, J. & Ballesteros, S. (1978) Consanguinity and migration in Viña del Mar, Chile 1888–1967. Revista Médica de Chile 108, 407441.Google Scholar
Wang, W., Qian, Cong & Bittles, A. H. (2002) Consanguineous marriage in PR China: a study in rural Man (Manchu) communities. Annals of Human Biology 29, 685690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuñiga, J. (1978) Inbreeding in the Elqui Valley's hydrographic basin (1900–1975). Revista Médica de Chile 106, 303312.Google ScholarPubMed