Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T10:38:55.294Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Divorce in the early years of marriage in England and Wales: results from a prospective study using linked records

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

John C. Haskey
John C. Haskey*
Affiliation:
Cabinet Office, Central Statistical Office, London
*
*Office of Population Censuses and Surveys, St Catherine's House, 10 Kingsway, London.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A representative sample of over one thousand couples who married during 1979 in England and Wales was followed from the date of marriage until mid-1984 to investigate the characteristics of couples who divorce soon after marriage.

Couples who apparently lived together before marriage had a below average chance of early divorce, whereas couples where the addresses of the partners before marriage were very close had a significantly high rate of early breakdown. The chance of early divorce was significantly above average for spouses marrying in their teens and for both husbands and wives who, at their marriage, belonged to social class V. Couples who married with a civil ceremony had an above average (and those marrying with a religious ceremony a below average) risk of early divorce, but such differences were found to be negligible on analysing the results from a matched case-control study in which each ‘case’ marriage (one which ended in early divorce) was matched with a ‘control’ marriage (one which did not end in early divorce). Age at marriage, marital status before marriage and the social class of both partners, the factors controlled for in the case-control study, are likely to be amongst the strongest predictors of early divorce.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 19 , Issue 3 , July 1987 , pp. 255 - 271
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailar, J. C. & Ederer, F. (1964) Significance factors for the ratio of a Poisson variable to its expectation. Biometrics, 20, 639.Google Scholar
Chester, R. (1972) Is there a relationship between childlessness and marriage break-down? J. biosoc. Sci. 4, 443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, D. A. (1977) Assortative mating in Britain. In: Equalities and Inequalities in Family Life, p. 53. Edited by Chester, R. & Peel, J.Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Coleman, D. A. & Haskey, J. C. (1986) Marital distance and its geographical orientation in England and Wales, 1979. Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr. 11, 337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, C. (1974) The association between divorce and social class in England and Wales. Br. J. Sociol. 25, 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, C. (1980) Childlessness and marital instability: a re-examination of the evidence. J. biosoc. Sci. 12, 121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haskey, J. C. (1983a) Marital status before marriage and age at marriage – their influence on the chance of divorce. Popul. Trends, 32, 4.Google Scholar
Haskey, J. C. (1983b) Social class patterns of marriage. Popul. Trends, 34, 12.Google Scholar
Haskey, J. C. (1984) Social class and socio-economic differentials in divorce in England and Wales. Popul. Stud. 38, 419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haskey, J. C. (1986a) Grounds for divorce in England and Wales – a social and demographic analysis. J. biosoc. Sci. 18, 127.Google Scholar
Haskey, J. C. (1986b) Recent trends in divorce in England and Wales: the effects of legislative changes. Popul. Trends, 44, 9.Google Scholar
Haskey, J. C. & Coleman, D. A. (1986) Cohabitation before marriage: a comparison of information from marriage registration and the General Household Survey. Popul. Trends, 43, 15.Google Scholar
Kendall, M. G. & Stuart, A. (1973) The Advanced Theory of Statistics, Vol. 2, Inference and Relationship. Griffin, London.Google Scholar
McNemar, Q. (1947) Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages. Psychometrika, 12, 153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murphy, M. J. (1984) Fertility, birth timing and marital breakdown: a reinterpretation of the evidence. J. biosoc. Sci. 16, 487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murphy, M. J. (1985) Demographic and socio-economic influences on recent British marital breakdown patterns. Popul. Stud. 39, 441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pike, M. C. & Morrow, R. H. (1970) Statistical analysis of patient–control studies in epidemiology. Br. J. prev. soc. Med. 24, 42.Google Scholar