Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T03:34:57.349Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ethnic intermarriage as a reflection of ethnic residential mixing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 September 2011

Ceri Peach
Ceri Peach
Affiliation:
School of Geography, University of Oxford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It may seem unexpected to find a geographer writing on the topic of ethnic segregation and ethnic intermarriage for a symposium of the Biosocial Society. Social geographers have, in fact, been actively working on ecological models of urban structure since the 1960s, but the development of this field dates back to the Chicago School of Sociology in the 1920s and 1930s. Geographers have become interested in both the spatial organization of society and in the social organization of space. Geographers have measured the ways in which social attitudes of groups manifest themselves in their residential choices of neighbourhood: groups which perceive themselves as socially distant from others are also spatially segregated from such groups. Residential location in neighbourhoods also affects the interactions between individuals in a fairly mechanical way. This field of social geography overlaps the spatial or ecological side of sociology so that practitioners of both schools often have more in common with each other than they have with others working in the fields from which they have evolved.

Type
IV. Ethnic intermarriage
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 15 , supplement S8: Biosocial Aspects of Ethnic Minorities , 1983 , pp. 189 - 205
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Besanceney, P.H. (1965) On reporting rates of intermarriage. Am. J. Sociol. 70, 717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beshers, J.M. (1962) Urban Social Structure. Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
Bishop, Y.M.M., Feinberg, S.E. & Holland, P.W. (1975) Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Duncan, O.D. & Duncan, B. (1955) A methodological analysis of segregation indexes. Am. sociol. Rev. 20, 210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, O.D. & Lieberson, S. (1959) Ethnic segregation and assimilation. Am. J. Sociol. 64, 364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glazer, N. & Moynihan, D.P. (1963) Beyond the Melting Pot. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Goodman, L. (1965) On the statistical analysis of mobility tables. Am. J. Sociol. 70, 564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, M.M. (1964) Assimilation in American Life. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Herberg, W. (1960) Protestant, Catholic, Jew. Doubleda, New York.Google Scholar
Hollingshead, A.B. (1950) Cultural factors in the selection of marriage mates. Am. sociol. Rev. 15, 619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, F.L. (1967) Ethnic concentration and assimilation: an Australian case study. Social Forces, 45, 412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kantrowitz, N. (1969) Ethnic and racial segregation in the New York metropolis, 1960. Am. J. Sociol. 74, 685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, R.J.R. (1944) Single or triple melting pot? Intermarriage trends in New Haven, 1870–1940. Am. J. Sociol. 49, 331.Google Scholar
Kennedy, R.J.R. (1952) Single or triple melting pot? Intermarriage in New Haven, 1870–1950. Am.J. Sociol. 58, 56.Google Scholar
Lieberson, S. (1961) The impact of residential segregation on ethnic assimilation. Social Forces, 40, 52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberson, S. (1963) Ethnic Patterns in American Cities. Free Press. New York.Google Scholar
Peach, C. (1974a) Homogamy. propinquity and segregation: a re-evaluation. Am. sociol. Rev. 39, 636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peach, G.C.K. (1974b) Ethnic segregation and intermarriage patterns in Sydney. Aust. geogr. Stud. 12, 219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsøy, N.R. (1966) Assortative mating and the structure of cities. Am. sociol. Rev. 31, 773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, J.L. (1951) The factor of religion in the selection of marriage mates. Am. sociol. Rev. 16, 487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timms, D.W.G. (1969) The dissimilarity between overseas-born and Australian-born in Queensland: dimensions of assimilation. Sociol. social Res. 53, 363.Google Scholar
Tyree, A. (1973) Mobility ratios and associations in mobility tables. Popul. Stud. 27, 577.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yancey, W.L., Ericksen, E.P. & Juliani, R.N. (1976) Emergent ethnicity: a review and reformation. Am. sociol. Rev. 41, 391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar