Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T11:19:45.870Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impact of migration, environment and socioeconomic conditions on the physique of Sikhs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

L. P. Singh  and
G. A. Harrison
L. P. Singh
Affiliation:
Institute of Biological Anthropology, University of Oxford
G. A. Harrison
Affiliation:
Institute of Biological Anthropology, University of Oxford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

This study is based on a cross-sectional sample of 459 Sikh adults, male and female, from three castes representing three levels of socioeconomic affluence. The sedentes group stayed all their lives in the native state of Punjab, India; the migrant group completed their active physical growth in the Punjab and left for the UK at around 20 years of age. The pattern of stature, weight, BMI and skinfolds in both groups reflects their level of socioeconomic affluence in their native Punjab. In the migrants, the caste differences in the mass measures largely disappear, but the differences in the skeletal dimensions remain. Both male and female migrants are heavier than their sedente counterparts and the male migrants have substantially higher amounts of subcutaneous fat. The change in weight, BMI and skinfolds in the migrants is inversely proportional to the original values of these variables in the native settings. Male sedentes and migrants are not statistically significantly different in stature, but the female migrants are taller than their sedente peers in all three castes. In a multivariate analysis, caste remains the most significant factor in the skeletal variables; in the mass characters, both caste and migration are statistically significant factors; age explains very little of the variation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , January 1996 , pp. 101 - 116
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boas, F. (1911) Changes in form of descendants of immigrants. Am. Anthrop. 14, 530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brush, G., Boyce, A. J. & Harrison, G. A. (1983) Association between anthropometric variables and reproductive performance in a Papua New Guinea population. Ann. hum. Biol. 10, 223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, N., Hiernaux, J., Jarman, S., Marshal, W. A., Tanner, J. M. & Whitehouse, R. H. (1981) Anthropometry. In: Practical Human Biology. Edited by Weiner, J. S. & Lourie, J. A.. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Edwards, D. A. W., Hammond, W. H., Healy, M. J. R., Tanner, J. M. & Whitehouse, R. H. (1955) Design and accuracy of calipers for measuring subcutaneous tissue thickness. Br. J. Nutr. 9, 133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldstein, M. S. (1943) Demographic and Bodily Changes in Descendants of Mexican Immigrants. Institute of Latin-American Studies, University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
Greulich, W. W. (1957) A comparison of the physical growth and development of American born and native Japanese children. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop. 15, 489.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harvey, R. G. (1974) An anthropometric survey of growth and physique of the populations of Karkar and Lufa subdistricts, New Guinea. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 268B, 279.Google Scholar
Lasker, G. W. (1946) Migration and physical differentiation; a comparison of immigrants with American born children. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop. 4, 273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasker, G. W. (1952) Environment, growth factors and selective migration. Hum. Biol. 24, 262.Google ScholarPubMed
Lasker, G. W. (1954) The question of physical selection of Mexican immigrants to the U.S.A. Hum. Biol. 26, 52.Google Scholar
Ljung, B., Bergsten-Brucefors, A. & Lindgren, G. (1974) The secular trends of physical growth in Sweden. Ann. hum. Biol. 1, 245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malina, R. M. & Bouchard, C. (1991) Growth, Maturation and Physical Activity. Human Kinetics, Champaign, Illinois.Google Scholar
McGarvey, S. T. & Schendel, D. E. (1986) Blood pressure of Samoans. In: The Changing Samoans: Behaviour and Health in Transition. Edited by Baker, P. T., Hanna, J. M. & Baker, T. S.. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Pawson, I. G. & Janes, C. R. (1985) Massive obesity in a migrant Samoan population. Am. J. publ Hlth, 71, 508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rona, R. J. & Chinn, S. (1994) Secular trends of growth and obesity in a monitoring system of nutritional status in Britain. Abstracts of the 7th International Congress of Auxology. p. 42. Edited by Eiben, O. G.. Szombathely, Hungary.Google Scholar
Shapiro, H. L. (1939) Migration and Environment. A Study of the Physical Characters of the Japanese Immigrants of Hawaii and the Effects of Environment on their Descendants. Oxford University Press, London.Google Scholar
Tanner, J. M. (1988) Human growth curve. In: Human Biology: An Introduction to Human Evolution, Variation, Growth and Adaptability, 3rd edn. Edited by Harrison, G. A., Tanner, J. M., Pilbeam, D. R. & Baker, P. T.. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar