Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:26:05.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nearwork, school achievement and Myopia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Geoffrey C. Ashton
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, School of Medicine, University of Hawaii

Summary

Data from 723 families tested for ocular refraction, measures of cognitive ability and school achievement, and measures of school-related nearwork activity were analysed, to examine the association of nearwork and intellectual ability with the development of myopia. The basis of the tests was detection of heterogeneity of standardized regression coefficients, derived from the regression of spherical refraction on age, between scaled nearwork or achievement measures. The results did not provide any evidence in support of the hypothesis that nearwork influences myopia but did confirm a relationship between school grades and myopia.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angle, J. & Wissman, D.A. (1980) The epidemiology of myopia. Am. J. Epidemiol. 111, 220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ashton, G.C. (1985) Segregation analysis of ocular refraction and myopia. Hum. Hered. in press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ashton, G.C., Polovina, J.J. & Vandenberg, S.G. (1979) Segregation analysis of family data for 15 tests of cognitive ability. Behav. Genet. 9, 329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bear, J.C., Richler, A. & Burke, G. (1981) Nearwork and familial resemblances in ocular refraction: a population study in Newfoundland. Clin. Genet. 19, 462.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Douglas, J.W.B., Ross, J.M. & Simpson, H.R. (1967) The ability and attainment of short-sighted pupils. J. Roy. statist. Soc. 130, 479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosvenor, T. (1970) Refractive state, intelligence test scores, and academic ability. Am. J. Optom. 47, 355.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heron, E. & Zytkoskee, A. (1981) Visual acuity and test performance. Am. J. Optom. phys. Optics, 58, 176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirsch, M.J. (1959) The relationship between refractive state of the eye and intelligence test scores. Am. J. Optom. Arch. Am. Acad. Optom. 36, 12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karlsson, J.L. (1973) Genetic relationship between giftedness and myopia. Hereditas, 73, 85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karlsson, J.L. (1975) Influence of the myopia gene on brain development. Clin. Genet. 8, 314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McManus, I.C. & Mascie-Taylor, C.G.N. (1983) Biosocial correlates of cognitive abilities. J. biosoc. Sci. 15, 289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richler, A. & Bear, J.C. (1980) The distribution of refraction in three isolated communities in western Newfoundland. Am. J. Optom. phys. Optics, 57, 861.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snedecor, G.W. & Cochran, W.G. (1967) Statistical Methods, 6th edn, pp. 186188. Iowa State University Press, Ames.Google Scholar
Wallman, J., Turkel, J. & Trachtman, J. (1978) Extreme myopia produced by modest change in early visual experience. Science, N.Y. 201, 1249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, J. R. & Vandenberg, S.G. (1977) Sex differences in cognition: evidence from the Hawaii Family Study. In: Sex and Behaviour, pp. 317335. Edited by T.E., McGill, D.A., Dewsburg & B.D., Sacks. Plenum, New York.Google ScholarPubMed
Young, F.A. (1955) An evaluation of the biological and nearwork concepts of myopia development. Am. J. Optom. Arch. Am. Acad. Optom. 32, 354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, F.A. (1963) Reading, measures of intelligence and refractive errors. Am. J. Optom. Arch. Am. Acad. Optom. 40, 257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, F.A. (1975) The development and control of myopia in humans and sub-human primates. Contacto, 19, 16.Google Scholar
Young, F.A. (1981) Intraocular pressure dynamics associated with accommodation. Doc. Ophthal. Proc. Series, Vol. 28, Edited by H.C., Fledelius, P.H., Alsbirk & E., Goldschmidt. W. Junk, The Hague.Google Scholar