Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-31T16:16:21.257Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ASSOCIATION BETWEEN HEALTHY LIFE EXPECTANCY AT BIRTH AND CONSANGUINEOUS MARRIAGES IN 63 COUNTRIES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

MOSTAFA SAADAT
MOSTAFA SAADAT
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, College of Sciences, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In order to investigate the association between mean inbreeding coefficient (α) and healthy life expectancy at birth (HALE; years) the present ecological study on 63 countries was done. Statistical analysis showed that HALE negatively and positively correlated with log10α and log10GNI per capita, respectively (p<0.001). It should be noted that log10α and log10GNI per capita were significantly correlated with each other (p<0.001). After controlling for log10GNI per capita, significant negative correlations between log10α and HALE were observed. The countries were stratified according to their GNI per capita into low- and high-income countries. In countries with high income, after controlling for log10GNI per capita, the correlation between HALE at birth and log10α was significant (for males r=−0.399, df=32, p=0.001; for females r=−0.683, df=32, p<0.001). In high-income Asian and African countries, where consanguineous marriage is common, after controlling for log10GNI per capita, the correlation between HALE at birth and log10α was significant (for males r=−0.819, df=8, p=0.004; for females r=−0.936, df=8, p<0.001). It seems that consanguinity influences HALE independent of country income.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 43 , Issue 4 , July 2011 , pp. 475 - 480
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bittles, A. H. (2001) Consanguinity and its relevance to clinical genetics. Clinical Genetics 60, 89–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bittles, A. H., Grant, J. C. & Shami, S. A. (1993) An evaluation of consanguinity as a determinant of reproductive behavior and mortality in Pakistan. International Journal of Epidemiology 22, 463–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez, E., Carcaba, A. & Ventura, J. (2010) Value efficiency analysis of health systems: does public financing play a role? Journal of Public Health, doi: 10.1007/s10389-009-0311-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, R. J., Smith, L. K., Hancock, R. M., Jagger, C. & Spiers, N. A. (2005) Socioeconomic factors associated with the onset of disability in older age: a longitudinal study of people aged 75 years and over. Social Science & Medicine 61, 1567–1575.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Othman, H. & Saadat, M. (2009) Prevalence of consanguineous marriages in Syria. Journal of Biosocial Science 41, 685–692.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saadat, M. (2007) Consanguineous marriages in Iranian folktales. Community Genetics 10, 37–40.Google ScholarPubMed
Saadat, M. (2008) Is consanguineous marriage historically encouraged? Journal of Biosocial Science 40, 153–154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saadat, M., Ansari-Lari, M. & Farhud, D. D. (2004) Consanguineous marriage in Iran. Annals of Human Biology 31, 263–269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saadat, M. & Zendeh-Boodi, Z. (2006) Correlation between incidences of self-inflicted burns and means of inbreeding coefficients, an ecological study. Annals of Epidemiology 16, 708–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoltenberg, C., Magnus, P., Skrondal, A. & Lie, R. T. (1999) Consanguinity and recurrence risk of stillbirth and infant death. American Journal of Public Health 89, 517–523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed