Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-20T17:26:52.899Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gender Trouble and Cross-Dressing in Early Modern England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2014

David Cressy
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A celebrated article in Shakespeare Quarterly opens with the question, “how many people cross-dressed in Renaissance England?” Jean Howard, who posed this intriguing question, suggests that disruption of the semiotics of dress, gender, and identity during the late Elizabethan and Jacobean periods points to “a sex-gender system under pressure” and a patriarchal culture disturbed by profound anxieties and contradictions. Even if the answer to her question turns out to be “very few,” the discourse surrounding the practice reveals an area of critical and problematic unease. Female transvestism on the streets of London, male transvestism on the stage, and vituperative attacks on cross-dressing by Protestant reformers are among the symptoms that indicate that “the subversive or transgressive potential of this practice could be and was recuperated in a number of ways.” Dressing boy actors for female roles, for example, was not simply “an unremarkable convention within Renaissance dramatic practice,” as some scholars have suggested, but rather a scandalous “source of homoerotic attraction” arousing “deep-seated fears” of an “unstable and monstrous” and feminized self. Whether in real life or in literature, by this account, cross-dressing involved struggle, resistance, and subversion, as well as modification, recuperation, and containment of the system of gendered patriarchal domination. Renaissance cross-dressing involved ideological work of a complex kind that ultimately, in Howard's materialist feminist analysis, “participated in the historical process eventuating in the English Revolution.” This is a claim that may make English historians gasp, but it is one that they cannot ignore.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of British Studies , Volume 35 , Issue 4 , October 1996 , pp. 438 - 465
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference of British Studies 1996

References

1 Howard, Jean E., “Crossdressing, the Theatre, and Gender Struggle in Early Modern England,” Shakespeare Quarterly 39 (1988): 418–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar, quotes on 418, 419 and n. 3. Howard's article has been reprinted in Ferris, Lesley, ed., Crossing the Stage: Controversies on Cross-Dressing (London and New York, 1993), pp. 20–46Google Scholar. A modified and evolved discussion, reiterating the original question, appears in Howard, Jean, The Stage and Social Struggle in Early Modern England (London, 1994), esp. pp. 94–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Howard, , “Crossdressing,” pp. 419, 436Google Scholar, quote on p. 436.

3 Woodbridge, Linda, Women and the English Renaissance: Literature and the Nature of Womankind, 1540–1620 (Urbana, Ill., and Chicago, 1984), pp. 139–58Google Scholar; Levine, Laura, Men in Women's Clothing: Anti-theatricality and Effeminization, 1579–1642 (Cambridge and New York, 1994), pp. 1–25Google Scholar; Jardine, Lisa, “Boy Actors, Female Roles, and Elizabethan Eroticism,” in Staging the Renaissance: Reinterpretations of Elizabethan and Jacobean Drama, ed. Kastan, David Scott and Stallybrass, Peter (New York and London, 1991), pp. 57–67Google Scholar, and Still Harping on Daughters: Women and Drama in the Age of Shakespeare (Totawa, N.J., 1983), pp. 9–36Google Scholar; Rackin, Phyllis, “Androgyny, Mimesis, and the Marriage of the Boy Heroine on the English Renaissance Stage,” PMLA 102 (1987): 29–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Greenblatt, Stephen, Shakespearian Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England (Berkeley, 1988)Google Scholar; Rose, Mary Beth, The Expense of Spirit: Love and Sexuality in English Renaissance Drama (Ithaca, N.Y., 1988)Google Scholar; Orgel, Stephen, “Nobody's Perfect: or, Why Did the English Stage Take Boys for Women?” South Atlantic Quarterly 88 (1989): 7–29Google Scholar; Kelly, Katherine E., “The Queen's Two Bodies: Shakespeare's Boy Actress in Breeches,” Theatre Journal 42 (1990): 81–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Brown, Steve, “The Boyhood of Shakespeare's Heroines: Notes on Gender Ambiguity in the Sixteenth Century,” Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900, 30 (1990): 243–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Heise, Ursula K., “Transvestism and the Stage Controversy in Spain and England, 1580–1680,” Theatre Journal 44 (1992): 357–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Zimmerman, Susan, ed., Erotic Politics: Desire on the Renaissance Stage (New York and London, 1992)Google Scholar. For a somewhat more cautious account, see Shapiro, Michael, Gender in Play on the Shakespearean Stage: Boy Heroines and Female Pages (Ann Arbor, Mich., 1994)Google Scholar. Among the few historical engagements with this topic, see Fletcher, Athony, “Men's Dilemma: The Future of Patriarchy in England, 1560–1660,” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 6th ser., 4 (1994): 61–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Gender, Sex and Subordination in England, 1500–1800 (New Haven, Conn., and London, 1995)Google Scholar.

4 Butler, Judith, Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity (New York and London, 1990)Google Scholar; Garber, Marjorie, Vested Interests: Cross-Dressing and Cultural Anxiety (New York and London, 1992)Google Scholar; Pagliassotti, Druann, “On the Discursive Construction of Sex and Gender,” Communication Research 20 (1993); 472–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kuchta, David, “The Semiotics of Masculinity in Renaissance England,” in Sexuality and Gender in Early Modern Europe, ed. Turner, James Grantham (Cambridge, 1993), pp. 233–45Google Scholar; Breitenberg, Mark, “Anxious Masculinity: Sexual Jealousy in Early Modern England,” Feminist Studies 19 (1993): 377–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Woodbridge, pp. 141, 224. Rose (p. 69n.) points out that Woodbridge finds “more coherence and range” in this alleged “transvestite movement” than the pamphlet literature can document.

6 Woodbridge, pp. 150, 153, 156. Woodbridge, cites The Mous Trap (1606)Google Scholar, The Cuckow (1607), The Fair Maid of Bristow (ca. 1604), The Fleire (ca. 1608), and The Roaring Girl (ca. 1608) among plays in which women adopt masculine attire. See also Garber, Marjorie, “The Logic of the Transvestite: The Roaring Girl (1608),” in Kastan, and Stallybrass, , eds., pp. 221–34Google Scholar; Orgel, Stephen, “The Subtexts of The Roaring Girl,” pp. 12–26Google Scholar, and Howard, Jean E., “Sex and Social Conflict: The Erotics of The Roaring Girl,” pp. 170–90, both in Zimmerman, Google Scholar, ed.

7 Kelly, p. 92; Brown, p. 249; Zimmerman, Susan, “Disruptive Desire: Artifice and Indeterminacy in Jacobean Comedy,” in Zimmerman, , ed., p. 42Google Scholar.

8 Schleiner, Winfried, “Male Cross-Dressing and Transvestism in Renaissance Romances,” Sixteenth Century Journal 19 (1988): 605–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Levine, Laura, “Men in Women's Clothing: Anti-theatricality and Effeminization from 1579 to 1642,” Criticism 28 (1986): 136Google Scholar, 130; Dollimore, Jonathan, “Shakespeare, Cultural Materialism, Feminism and Marxist Humanism,” New Literary History 21 (1990): 483CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Zimmerman, p. 43. Note, however, the more circumspect remarks by Stephen Orgel, “The Subtexts of The Roaring Girl,” on “the eye of the beholder” and Lisa Jardine on “textual imputation” in Zimmerman, ed., pp. 14, 28.

9 Levine, , Men in Women's Clothing (n. 3 above), pp. 1–25Google Scholar, quotes on pp. 5, 8, 9.

10 Hooper, Wilfrid, “The Tudor Sumptuary Laws,” English Historical Review 30 (1915): 433–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Baldwin, Frances Elizabeth, Sumptuary Legislation and Personal Regulation in England (Baltimore, 1926)Google Scholar. We need a modern historical analysis of the social semiotics of costume.

11 Deut. 22:5: “The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman's garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the Lord thy God.”

12 Gascoigne, George, The Steel Glas: A Satyre (1576), quoted in Rose, , p. 68Google Scholar.

13 Gosson, Stephen, Playes Confuted in Fiue Actions (1582)Google Scholar, in Markets of Bawdrie: The Dramatic Criticism of Stephen Gosson, ed. Kinney, Arthur (Salzburg, 1974), p. 175Google Scholar.

14 Harrison, William, The Description of England (1577), ed. Edelen, Georges (Ithaca, N.Y., 1968), p. 147Google Scholar.

15 Beard, Thomas, The Theatre of Gods Ivdgements, Short-Title Catalogue (STC) 1661 (London, 1631), pp. 419–20Google Scholar. Earlier editions appeared in 1597 and 1612.

16 Rainolds, John, The Overthrow of Stage-Playes, STC 20616 (Middleburgh, 1599), p. 97Google Scholar.

17 Hill, Adam, The Crie of England, STC 13465 (London, 1595), p. 17Google Scholar.

18 Stubbes, Phillip, The Anatomie of Abuses, STC 23376 (London, 1583)Google Scholar, sigs. E7v–F5v. For more in this vein, see Barish, Jonas, The Antitheatrical Prejudice (Berkeley and Los Angles, 1981), pp. 80–92Google Scholar.

19 McClure, N. E., ed., The Letters of John Chamberlain (Philadelphia, 1939), 2:286–87, 289Google Scholar. This includes the King James quote.

20 HicMulier: or, The Man-Woman: Being a Medicine to cure the Coltish Disease of the Staggers in the Masculine-Feminines of our Times, STC 13378 (London, 1620)Google Scholar; Haec-Vir: Or, The Womanish-Man, STC 12599 (London, 1620)Google Scholar; Muld Sacke: Or The Apologie of Hie Mulier, STC 21538 (London, 1620)Google Scholar. The three are reproduced in Baines, Barbara J., ed., Three Pamphlets on the Jacobean Antifeminist Controversy (New York, 1978)Google Scholar.

21 Hic Mulier: or, The Man-Woman, sigs A3, A4, Bv–B2, C, B2v–B3. See also John Taylor's attack on “shameless double-sexed hermaphrodites, Virago roaring-girls, that to their middle, to know what sex they were was half a riddle,” quoted in Capp, Bernard, The World of John Taylor the Water Poet, 1578–1653 (Oxford, 1994), 115CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

22 Prynne, William, Histrio-Mastix: The Players Scovrge, or Actors Tragædie (London, 1633), pp. 171–72, 179–80, 182–83, 206–9Google Scholar.

23 Rogers, Daniel, Matrimoniall Honour: Or, the Mutual Crowne and Comfort of Godly, Loyal, and Chaste Marriage (London, 1642), p. 174Google Scholar.

24 Davis, Natalie Zemon, Fiction in the Archives: Pardon Tales and Their Tellers in 16th Century France (Stanford, Calif., 1987)Google Scholar; Cressy, David, “De la fiction dans les archives? Ou le monstre de 1569,” Annales: Économies, sociétés, civilisations 48 (1993): 1309–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

25 For the “Great Tew Circle” see Trevor-Roper, Hugh, Catholics, Anglicans and Puritans: Seventeenth Century Essays (Chicago, 1988), pp. 166–230Google Scholar, quote on p. 166.

26 Oxfordshire Archives, Oxford, Oxford Archdeaconry Office Acts, c. 12, fol. 75. Subsequent citations of this case are on fols. 75v, 81, 151.

27 Wilson, Adrian, “The Ceremony of Childbirth and its Interpretation,” in Women as Mothers in Pre-industrial England, ed. Fildes, Valerie (London, 1990), pp. 68–107Google Scholar; Eccles, Audrey, Obstetrics and Gynaecology in Tudor and Stuart England (Kent, Ohio, 1982)Google Scholar. Robert Herrick refers to “the child-bed mysteries” in his poem, “Julia's Churching, or Purification,” in Hesperides (London, 1648)Google Scholar.

28 Evenden, Doreen, “Mothers and Their Midwives in Seventeenth-Century London,” in The Art of Midwifery: Early Modern Midwives in Europe, ed. Marland, Hilary (London and New York, 1993), pp. 9–26Google Scholar. For the midwife's oath, see The Book of Oaths (1649; reprint, London, 1689)Google Scholar. Ben Jonson plays on women's secrets and mysteries in Epicoene, or The Silent Woman, STC 14763 (London, 1620), 4:2, 5:3Google Scholar.

29 Dekker, Rudolf M. and van de Pol, Lotte C., The Tradition of Female Transvestism in Early Modern Europe (New York, 1989), p. 2CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

30 Woodbridge (n. 3 above), p. 139.

31 Robert Herrick (1591–1674) was a Devonshire minister in the 1630s. “Delight in Disorder” (“A sweet disorder in the dress … ”) and “Upon Julia's Clothes” (“When as in silks my Julia goes …”) come from Hesperides, as does “Julia's Petticoat.”

32 Laslett, Peter, “The Wrong Way through the Telescope: A Note on Literary Evidence in Sociology and Historical Sociology,” British Journal of Sociology 27 (1976): 319–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

33 See works by Levine (nn. 3, 8 above); and Woodbridge. Compare the treatment of men in women's clothing in Shakespeare, William, The Merry Wives of Windsor (performed 1597)Google Scholar; and Heywood, Thomas, The Brazen Age, STC 13310 (London, 1613)Google Scholar.

34 Schleiner, Louise, “Ladies and Gentlemen in Two Genres of Elizabethan Fiction,” Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900, 29 (1989): 1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Winfried Schleiner (n. 8 above), pp. 605–19; Jordan, Constance, Renaissance Feminism: Literary Texts and Political Models (Ithaca, N.Y., and London, 1990), pp. 223–28Google Scholar. Pyrocles in James Shirley's stage version of The Arcadia (1640) “played the man indeed,” though dressed in “feminine shape”; see Gifford, William and Dyce, Alexander, eds., The Dramatic Works and Poems of James Shirley (London, 1833; reprint, New York, 1966), 4:175–218Google Scholar.

35 Fletcher, John, Monsieur Thomas, STC 11071 (London, 1639)Google Scholar, performed ca. 1610–13; Beaumont, Francis and Fletcher, John, The Scornful Ladie, STC 1686 (London, 1616; reprint, 1625, 1630, 1633, 1639)Google Scholar; Dekker, Thomas and Webster, John, West-ward Hoe, STC 6540 (London, 1607)Google Scholar; A Pleasant Conceyted History of George a Greene, the Pinner of Wakefield, STC 12212 (London, 1599)Google Scholar; Haughton, William, English-men for my Money; or … a Woman Will Have her Will, STC 12931 (London, 1616; reprint, 1626, 1631)Google Scholar; Field, Nathan, Amends for Ladies, STC 10851 (1618; reprint, London, 1639)Google Scholar; Middleton, Thomas, A Mad World, My Masters, STC 17888 (London, 1608)Google Scholar; Jonson, Ben, Epicoene (first performed by the Revels children in 1609)Google Scholar. Among these, only Epicoene has featured extensively in recent critical scholarship. See, e.g., Rose (n. 3 above), pp. 50–64; and sources cited in n. 6 above. See also Freeburg, Victor Oscar, Disguise Plots in Elizabethan Drama (New York, 1915), pp. 102–8, 117–19, 190–91Google Scholar.

36 Crewe, Jonathan, “In the Field of Dreams: Transvestism in Twelfth Night and The Crying Game” Representations 50 (1995): 101–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

37 Stallybrass, Peter, “Transvestism and the ‘body beneath’: Speculating on the Boy Actor,” in Zimmerman, , ed. (n. 3 above), p. 76Google Scholar.

38 Hope, Robert Charles, ed., The Popish Kingdom or Reigne of Antichrist written in Latin Verse by Thomas Naogeorgus and Englyshed by Barnabe Googe (London, 1880), p. 48Google Scholar.

39 Fetherstone, Christopher, A Dialogue Agaynst Light, Lewde, and Lacivious Dauncing, STC 10835 (London, 1582)Google Scholar, sig. D7.

40 Sharp, Buchanan, In Contempt of All Authority: Rural Artisans and Riot in the West of England, 1586–1660 (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1980), p. 104Google Scholar. See also Ingram, Martin, “Ridings, Rough Music and Mocking Rhymes in Early Modern England,” in Popular Culture in Seventeenth-Century England, ed. Reay, Barry (London, 1985), pp. 166–97Google Scholar.

41 Davis, Natalie Zemon, Society and Culture in Early Modern France (Stanford, Calif., 1975), pp. 147–49Google Scholar, cites English examples.

42 Stephano Janiculo, an associate of Arabella Stuart, escaped a Turkish prison disguised as a woman. Prince James, later James II, is said to have disguised himself as a woman while fleeing after the battle of Worcester. Female costume was almost de rigueur for escaping from the Tower of London.

43 Dekker and van de Pol (n. 29 above), pp. 1–14; Raymond, Joad, ed., Making the News: An Anthology of the Newsbooks of Revolutionary England, 1641–1660 (New York, 1993), pp. 148, 167Google Scholar. The diarist Walter Younge reported ca. 1627, “there was a woman apprehended at Plymouth in the attire or habit of a man by the mayor, at the time the Earl of Denbigh and Sir Henry Martyn were to go to sea. It is said that she is one Smith's wife of London, kept by Sir Henry Martyn”; see British Library, Additional Ms 35,331, fol. 16. See also the case of Joanna Goodman in 1569, cited in text below, and references to Mary Ambree, ca. 1584, cited in text above.

44 Howard, “Crossdressing, the Theatre, and Gender Struggle” (n. 1 above), pp. 420–21Google Scholar; Benbow, R. Mark and Hawkyard, Alasdair D. K., “Legal Records of Cross-Dressing,” in Shapiro, , ed. (n. 3 above), pp. 225–34Google Scholar.

45 Emmison, F. G., Elizabethan Life: Morals and the Church Courts (Chelmsford, 1973), p. 18Google Scholar; Hale, William H., A Series of Precedents and Proceedings in Criminal Causes (London, 1847), p. 212Google Scholar.

46 Hale, p. 212.

47 Mulholland, P. A., “The Date of The Roaring Girl,” Review of English Studies, n.s., 28 (1977): 17–31Google Scholar; Mulholland, Paul A., ed., The Roaring Girl (Manchester, 1987), pp. 262–63Google Scholar. The case can be found in Greater London Record Office, DLC/310, fols. 19–20.

48 Borthwick Institute, York, Court of High Commission, Cause Papers, HCCP 1596, no. 7.

49 H.M.C., Calendar of Cecil MSS. at Hatfield House (1899), 8:201Google Scholar.

50 Husey, Arthur, ed., “Visitations of the Archdeacon of Canterbury,” Archaeologia Cantiana 27 (1904); 226Google Scholar.

51 Borthwick Institute, York, Metropolitical Visitation of the Diocese of Chester, V. 1633, Court Papers, fol. 113v.

52 Lake, Peter, “The Laudian Style: Order, Uniformity and the Pursuit of the Beauty of Holiness in the 1630s,” in The Early Stuart Church, 1603–1642, ed. Fincham, Kenneth (London, 1993), pp. 161–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar, draws attention to the Laudian view of the church as the “house of God.”

53 Douglas, Mary, Purity and Danger (London, 1969), esp. pp. 4, 113Google Scholar.