Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T00:01:34.771Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The acquisition of accusative object clitics by IA children from China: Evidence of early age effects?*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 November 2013

AUDREY DELCENSERIE  and
FRED GENESEE
AUDREY DELCENSERIE*
Affiliation:
McGill University, Canada
FRED GENESEE
Affiliation:
McGill University, Canada
*
Address for correspondence: Audrey Delcenserie, Department of Psychology, McGill University, Stewart Biology Building, 1205 Dr Penfield Avenue, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3A 1B1. e-mail: audrey.delcenserie@mail.mcgill.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present study compared the performance of twenty-seven French-speaking internationally adopted (IA) children from China to that of twenty-seven monolingual non-adopted French-speaking children (CTL) matched for age, gender, and socioeconomic status on a Clitic Elicitation task. The IA children omitted significantly more accusative object clitics and made significantly more agreement errors using clitics than the CTL children. No other significant differences were found between the groups. The findings suggest that the adoptees may experience difficulties in morphosyntactic development possibly as a result of their delayed exposure to the adopted language.

Type
Brief Research Reports
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 42 , Issue 1 , January 2015 , pp. 196 - 209
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

The authors would like to thank Dr Theres Grüter (University of Hawaii at Manoa) for her assistance in designing this study.

References

REFERENCES

Abrahamsson, N. & Hyltenstam, K. (2009). Age of onset and nativelikeness in a second language: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning 59, 249–306.Google Scholar
Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/4–18 and 1991 Profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
Cohen, N. J., Lojkasek, M., Zadeh, Z. Y., Pugliese, M. & Kiefer, H. (2008). Children adopted from China: A prospective study of their growth and development. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 49, 458–68.Google Scholar
Croft, C., Beckett, C., Rutter, M., Castle, J., Colvert, E., Groothues, C., Hawkins, A., Kreppner, J., Stevens, S. E. & Sonuga-Barke, E. J. (2007). Early adolescent outcomes of institutionally-deprived and non-deprived adoptees: Language as a protective factor and a vulnerable outcome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 48, 31–44.Google Scholar
DeGeer, B. (1982). Internationally adopted children in communication: A developmental study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Lund University, Lund, Sweden.Google Scholar
Delcenserie, A. & Genesee, F. (2013). Language and memory abilities of internationally-adopted children from China: Evidence for early age effects? Journal of Child Language. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S030500091300041X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delcenserie, A.Genesee, F. & Gauthier, K. (2013). Language abilities of internationally-adopted children from China: Evidence for early age effects? Applied Psycholinguistics 34, 541–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauthier, K. & Genesee, F. (2011). Language development in internationally-adopted children: A special case of early second language learning. Child Development 82, 887–901.Google Scholar
Gauthier, K., Genesee, F. & Kasparian, K. (2012). Acquisition of complement clitics and tense morphology in internationally-adopted children acquiring French. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 15, 304–19.Google Scholar
Glennen, S. & Masters, M. (2002). Typical and atypical language development in infants and toddlers adopted from Eastern Europe. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 11, 417–33.Google Scholar
Grondin, N. & White, L. (1996). Functional categories in child L2 acquisition of French. Language Acquisition 5, 1–34.Google Scholar
Grüter, T. (2005). Comprehension and production of French object clitics by child second language learners and children with specific language impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics 26, 363–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grüter, T. & Crago, M. (2012). Object clitics and their omission in child L2 French: The contributions of processing limitations and L1 transfer. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 15, 531–49.Google Scholar
Hamann, C. (2004). Comparing the development of the nominal and the verbal functional domain in French language impairments. In Prévost, P. & Paradis, J. (eds), The acquisition of French in different contexts: Focus on functional categories, 109–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamann, C., Rizzi, L. & Frauenfelder, U. (1996). On the acquisition of subject and object clitics in French. In Clahsen, H. (ed.), Generative perspectives on language acquisition, 309–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoff, E. (2006). How social contexts support and shape language development. Developmental Review 26, 55–88.Google Scholar
Hulk, A. (1997). The acquisition of French object pronouns by a Dutch/French child. In Sorace, A., Heycock, C. & Shillcock, R. (eds), Proceedings of the GALA'97 Conference on Language Acquisition, 521–26. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Hulk, A. & Müller, N. (2000). Bilingual first language acquisition at the interface between syntax and pragmatics. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 3, 227–44.Google Scholar
Kayne, R. S. (1975). French syntax: The transformational cycle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Paradis, J. (2004). The relevance of specific language impairment in understanding the role of transfer in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics 25, 67–82.Google Scholar
Pierce, L. J., Genesee, F. & Paradis, J. (2013). Acquisition of English grammatical morphology by internationally adopted children from China. Journal of Child Language 40(5), 1076–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pomerleau, A., Malcuit, G., Chicoine, J.-F., Séguin, R., Belhumeur, C., Germain, P., Amyot, I. & Jéliu, G. (2005). Health status, cognitive and motor development of young children adopted from China, East Asia, and Russia across the first 6 months after adoption. International Journal of Behavioral Development 29, 445–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, J., Pollock, K., Krakow, R., Price, J., Fulmer, K. & Wang, P. (2005). Language development in preschool-age children adopted from China. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 48, 93–107.Google Scholar
Snedeker, J., Geren, J. & Shafto, C. (2007). Starting over: International adoption as a natural experiment in language development. Association for Psychological Science 18, 78–87.Google Scholar
Tuller, L., Delage, H., Monjauze, C., Piller, A.-G. & Barthez, M.-A. (2011). Clitic pronoun production as a measure of atypical language development in French. Lingua 121, 423–41.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. & Naglieri, J. (2006). Wechsler Non-Verbal Scale of Ability. Toronto: Harcourt Assessment.Google Scholar
Werker, J. & Tees, R. (2002). Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development 25, 121–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, L. (1996). Clitics in child L2 French. In Clahsen, H. (ed.), Generative perspectives on language acquisition, 335–68. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar