Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T19:10:13.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

English-learning one- to two-year-olds do not show a consonant bias in word learning*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2013

CAROLINE FLOCCIA*
Affiliation:
University of Plymouth, UK
THIERRY NAZZI
Affiliation:
University Paris Descartes, France
CLAIRE DELLE LUCHE
Affiliation:
University of Plymouth, UK
SILVANA POLTROCK
Affiliation:
University Paris Descartes, France
JEREMY GOSLIN
Affiliation:
University of Plymouth, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Caroline Floccia, Plymouth University – School of Psychology, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA, United Kingdom. e-mail: caroline.floccia@plymouth.ac.uk

Abstract

Following the proposal that consonants are more involved than vowels in coding the lexicon (Nespor, Peña & Mehler, 2003), an early lexical consonant bias was found from age 1;2 in French but an equal sensitivity to consonants and vowels from 1;0 to 2;0 in English. As different tasks were used in French and English, we sought to clarify this ambiguity by using an interactive word-learning study similar to that used in French, with British-English-learning toddlers aged 1;4 and 1;11. Children were taught two CVC labels differing on either a consonant or vowel and tested on their pairing of a third object named with one of the previously taught labels, or part of them. In concert with previous research on British-English toddlers, our results provided no evidence of a general consonant bias. The language-specific mechanisms explaining the differential status for consonants and vowels in lexical development are discussed.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

This research was conducted thanks to a bilateral ESRC/ANR grant RES-062-33-0001. Many thanks to Melanie Havy and Ian Dennis for their help during the writing of this paper.

References

REFERENCES

Acha, J. & Perea, M. (2010). On the role of consonants and vowels in visual-word processing: evidence with a letter search paradigm. Language and Cognitive Processes 25, 423–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baillargeon, R. (1987). Object permanence in 31/2- and 41/2-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology 23, 655–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basbøll, H. (2005). The phonology of Danish. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bijeljac-Babic, R., Nassurally, K., Havy, M. & Nazzi, T. (2009). Infants can rapidly learn words in a foreign language. Infant Behavior and Development 32, 476–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bleses, D., Basbøll, H. & Vach, W. (2011). Is Danish difficult to acquire? Evidence from Nordic past-tense studies. Language and Cognitive Processes 26, 1193–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonatti, L. L., Peña, M., Nespor, M. & Mehler, J. (2005). Linguistic constraints on statistical computations: the role of consonants and vowels in continuous speech processing. Psychological Science 16, 451–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonatti, L. L., Peña, M., Nespor, M. & Mehler, J. (2007). On consonants, vowels, chickens and eggs. Psychological Science 18(10), 924–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caramazza, A., Chialant, D., Capasso, R. & Miceli, G. (2000). Separable processing of consonants and vowels. Nature 403, 428–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carreiras, M. & Price, C. J. (2008). Brain activation for consonants and vowels. Cerebral Cortex 18, 1727–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Content, A., Kearns, R. K. & Frauenfelder, U. H. (2001). Boundaries versus onsets in syllabic segmentation. Journal of Memory and Language 45, 177–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, A., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Soler-Vilageliu, O. & Van Ooijen, B. (2000). Constraints of vowels and consonants on lexical selection: cross-linguistic comparisons. Memory and Cognition 38, 746–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Cara, B. & Goswami, U. (2002). Similarity relations among spoken words: the special status of rimes in English. Behavior Research Methods 34, 416–23.Google ScholarPubMed
DePaolis, R. A., Vihman, M. M. & Keren-Portnoy, T. (2011). Do production patterns influence the processing of speech in prelinguistic infants? Infant Behavior and Development 34, 590601.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., Thal, D., Bates, E., Hartung, J. P., Pethick, S. & Reilly, J. S. (1993). The MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories: user's guide and technical manual. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brokes Publishing.Google Scholar
Floccia, C., Goslin, J., Kolinsky, R. & Morais, J. J. (2012). Syllable effects in a fragment detection task in Italian listeners. Frontiers in Language Sciences 3, 140; available at: <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3349302/>.Google Scholar
Floccia, C., Nazzi, T., Austin, K., Arreckx, F. & Goslin, J. (2011). Perception of stress patterns in word learning tasks in British toddlers. Developmental Science 14, 602–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goslin, J. & Floccia, C. (2007). Comparing French syllabification in preliterate children and adults. Applied Psycholinguistics 28, 341–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goswami, U. (2002). In the beginning was the rhyme? A reflection on Hulme, Hatcher, Nation, Brown, Adams, and Stuart (2002). Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 82, 4757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, A., Plunkett, K. & Schafer, G. (2000). Infant vocabulary development assessed with a British Communicative Development Inventory. Journal of Child Language 27, 689705.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Havy, M., Bertoncini, J. & Nazzi, T. (2011). Word learning and phonetic processing in preschool-age children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 108, 2543.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Havy, M. & Nazzi, T. (2009). Better processing of consonantal over vocalic information in word learning at 16 months of age. Infancy 14, 439–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Havy, M., Serres, J. & Nazzi, T. (in press). A consonant/vowel asymmetry in word-form processing: eye-tracking evidence in childhood and in adulthood.Google Scholar
Hitch, G. J., Halliday, S., Schaafstal, A. M. & Schraagen, J. M. C. (1988). Visual working memory in young children. Memory and Cognition 16, 120–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hochmann, J.-R., Benavides-Varela, S., Nespor, M. & Mehler, J. (2011). Consonants and vowels: different roles in early language acquisition. Developmental Science 14, 1445–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jusczyk, P. W., Goodman, M. B. & Baumann, A. (1999). Nine-month-olds' attention to sound similarities in syllables. Journal of Memory and Language 40, 6282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keidel, J. L., Jenison, R. L., Kluender, K. R. & Seidenberg, M. S. (2007). Does grammar constrain statistical learning? Commentary on Bonatti, Peña, Nespor and Mehler (2005). Psychological Science 18, 922–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelly, M. H. (2004). Word onset patterns and lexical stress in English. Journal of Memory and Language 50, 231–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kern, S. (2007). Lexicon development in French-speaking infants. First Language 27(3), 227–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, M. C. (1994). Probabilistic constraints and syntactic ambiguity resolution. Language and Cognitive Processes 9, 157201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddieson, I. (1984). Patterns of sounds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mani, N. & Plunkett, K. (2007). Phonological specificity of vowels and consonants in early lexical representations. Journal of Memory and Language 57, 252–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mani, N. & Plunkett, K. (2010). Twelve-month-olds know their cups from their keps and tups. Infancy 15, 445–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition. Cognition 25, 71102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayor, J. & Plunkett, K. (2009). Using TRACE to model infant sensitivity to vowel and consonant mispronunciations. In Taatgen, N. & van Rijn, H. (eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
McLennan, C. T. & Luce, P. A. (2005). Examining the time course of indexical specificity effects in spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 31, 306–21.Google ScholarPubMed
Mehler, J., Dommergues, J. Y., Frauenfelder, U. H. & Segui, J. (1981). The syllable's role in speech segmentation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 20, 298305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metsala, J. L. & Walley, A. C. (1998). Spoken vocabulary growth and the segmental restructuring of lexical representations: precursors to phonemic awareness and early reading ability. In Metsala, J. L. & Ehri, L. C. (eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy, 89120. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.Google Scholar
Mills, D. L., Coffey-Corina, S. & Neville, H. J. (1997). Language comprehension and cerebral specialization from 13 to 20 months. Developmental Neuropsychology 13, 397445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nazzi, T. (2005). Use of phonetic specificity during the acquisition of new words: differences between consonants and vowels. Cognition 98, 1330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nazzi, T. & Bertoncini, J. (2009). Phonetic specificity in early lexical acquisition: new evidence from consonants in coda positions. Language and Speech 52, 463–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nazzi, T., Floccia, C., Moquet, B. & Butler, J. (2009). Bias for consonantal over vocalic information in French- and English-learning thirty-month-olds: crosslinguistic evidence in early word learning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 102, 522–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nazzi, T. & New, B. (2007). Beyond stop consonants: consonantal specificity in early lexical acquisition. Cognitive Development 22, 271–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nespor, M., Peña, M. & Mehler, J. (2003). On the different roles of vowels and consonants in speech processing and language acquisition. Lingue e Linguaggio 2, 203–29.Google Scholar
New, B., Araùjo, V. & Nazzi, T. (2008). Differential processing of consonants and vowels in lexical access through reading. Psychological Science 19, 1223–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
New, B. & Nazzi, T. (2012). The time course of consonant and vowel processing during word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes; available at: <http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01690965.2012.735678?af=R&#preview>.Google Scholar
Nishibayashi, L.-L. & Nazzi, T. (2011). Asymmetry in consonant/vowel processing: evidence from early word segmentation. Paper presented at the 36th Annual Boston Conference on Language Development.Google Scholar
Pharao, N. (2011). Plosive reduction at the group level and in the individual speaker. In Lee, W.-S & Zee, E. (eds.), Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Science XVII 2011, 1590–93. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong, Department of Chinese, Translation and Linguistics.Google Scholar
Pisoni, D. B. (1973). Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels. Perception and Psychophysics 13, 253–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plunkett, K., Sinha, C., Møller, M. F. & Strandsby, O. (1992). Symbol grounding or the emergence of symbols? Vocabulary growth in children and a connectionist net. Connection Science 4, 293312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pons, F. & Toro, J. M. (2010). Structural generalizations over consonants and vowels in 11-month-old infants. Cognition 116, 361–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Radeau, M., Morais, J. & Segui, J. (1995). Phonological priming between monosyllabic spoken words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21, 1297–311.Google Scholar
Repp, B. H. (1984). Categorical perception: issues, methods, findings. In Lass, N. J. (ed.), Speech and language: advances in basic research and practice, Vol. 10, 243335. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Stoel-Gammon, C. & Dunn, C. (1985). Normal and disordered phonology in children. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Swingley, D. (2003). Phonetic detail in the developing lexicon. Language and Speech 46, 265–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swingley, D. (2005). 11-month-olds' knowledge of how familiar words sound. Developmental Science 8, 432–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swingley, D. (2009). Onsets and codas in 1·5-year-olds' word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language 60, 252–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swingley, D. & Aslin, R. N. (2007). Lexical competition in young children's word learning. Cognitive Psychology 54(2), 99132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tan, S. H. & Schafer, G. (2005). Toddlers' novel word learning: effects of phonological representation, vocabulary size and parents' ostensive behaviour. First Language 25, 131–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toro, J. M., Nespor, M., Mehler, J. & Bonatti, L. L. (2008). Finding words and rules in a speech stream: functional differences between vowels and consonants. Psychological Science 19, 137–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treiman, R. & Zukowski, A. (1996). Children's sensitivity to syllables, onsets, rimes and phonemes. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 61, 193215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vihman, M. M. & de Boysson-Bardies, B. (1994). The nature and origins of ambient language influence on infant vocal production and early words. Phonetica 51, 159–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vihman, M. M., Nakai, S., DePaolis, R. A. & Hallé, P. (2004). The role of accentual pattern in early lexical representation. Journal of Memory and Language 50, 336–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werker, J. F., Fennell, C. T., Corcoran, K. M. & Stager, C. L. (2002). Infants' ability to learn phonetically similar words: effects of age and vocabulary size. Infancy 3, 130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zesiger, P. & Jöhr, J. (2011). Les représentations phonologiques des mots chez le jeune enfant. Enfance 2011, 293309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar