Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:35:42.268Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Phonological and morphological analysis skills in young children*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Karen M. Smith-Lock
Affiliation:
University of Torontoand Haskins Laboratories, Connecticut
Hyla Rubin*
Affiliation:
University of Torontoand Haskins Laboratories, Connecticut
*
Address for correspondence: Haskins Laboratories, 270 Crown Street, New Haven, Connecticut 06511–6695, USA.

Abstract

Twenty-two normally developing five-year-olds were asked to judge, identify, repair and explain phonological and morphological errors. All of the errors involved the addition, substitution or omission of a single phoneme, which in the morphological task, was also an inflectional morpheme. Stimuli were controlled for type of error (omission, addition, substitution), location of the error (word final) and word status of the resulting error (word, non-word). Children performed significantly better on the phonological task than on the morphological task. It is proposed that the results are due to differences in the type and location of linguistic information to be analysed and to differences in memory demands in the tasks.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

This study was submitted in partial fulfilment of the first author's Master of Health Science degree. We would like to thank the Metropolitan Separate School Board, Toronto, Ontario, particularly Connie Rankin and Hariette de Boer, for allowing us to collect data in their classrooms. We would also like to thank Ignatius G. Mattingly and Diane Lillo-Martin for thought-provoking discussion and comments on a draft of this article. The article has benefited greatly from the careful comments of two anonymous reviewers. This work was supported in part by Grant A2008 to Hyla Rubin from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and by Grant HD-O1994 to Haskins Laboratories from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

References

REFERENCES

Blachman, B. (1984). Language analysis skills and early reading acquisition. In Wallach, G. P. & Butler, K. (eds), Language learning disabilities in school age children. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkens.Google Scholar
Clarke, E. (1978). Awareness of language: some evidence from what children say and do. In Sinclair, A., Jarvella, R. J. & Levelt, W. J. M. (eds), The child's conception of language. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Cole, R. A. (1973). Listening for mispronunciations: a measure of what we hear during speech. Perception and Psychophysics 1, 153–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, R. A. (1981). Perception of fluent speech by children and adults. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 379, 92109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, R. A. & Perfetti, C. A. (1980). Listening for mispronunciations in a children's story: the use of context by children and adults. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 19, 297315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Villiers, J. G. & de Villiers, P. A. (1974). Competence and performance in child language. Journal of Child Language 1, 1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fluharty, N. B. (1978). Fluharty preschool speech and language screening test. Boston: Teaching Resources.Google Scholar
Fox, B. & Routh, D. K. (1975). Analysing spoken language into words, syllables and phonemes: a developmental study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 4, 331–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleitman, L. R., Gleitman, H. & Shipley, E. F. (1972). The emergence of the child as grammarian. Cognition 1, 137–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D., Fischer, F. W. & Carter, B. (1974). Explicit syllable and phoneme segmentation in the young child. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 18, 201–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosner, J. & Simon, D. P. (1971). The auditory analysis test: an initial report. Journal of Learning Disabilities 4, 384–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, H. (1988). Morphological knowledge and early writing ability. Language and Speech 31, 337–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubin, H., Mallory, S., Farndale, D., Howe, T. & Ramdeholl, S. (n.d.). The development of language analysis in young children. Unpublished study.Google Scholar
Shipley, K. G., Stone, T. A. & Sue, M. B. (1983). Test for examining expressive morphology. Arizona: Communication Skill Builders.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1973). Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In Ferguson, C. A. & Slobin, D. I. (eds), Studies of child language development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1985). Crosslinguistic evidence for the language-making capacity. In Slobin, D. I. (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition. Vol. 2: Theoretical issues. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Smith, C. L. & Tager-Flusberg, H. (1982). Metalinguistic awareness and language development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 34, 449–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treiman, R. (1985). Onsets and rimes as units of spoken syllables: evidence from children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 39, 161–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tunmer, W. E. & Herriman, H. L. (1984). The development of metalinguistic awareness: a conceptual overview. In Sinclair, A., Jarvella, R. J. & Levelt, W. J. M. (eds), The child's conception of language. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Walley, A. C. (1987). Young children's detections of word-initial and word-final mispronunciations in constrained and unconstrained context. Cognitive Development 2, 145–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhurova, L. Y. (1963). The development of analysis of words into their sounds by preschool children. Soviet Psychology and Psychiatry II, 1727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar