Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T23:41:16.939Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pinker S., Language learnability and language development. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1984. Pp. xi + 435.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Martin D. S. Braine
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts and Science, New York University, 6 Washington Place, 8th Floor, New York, NY 10003, USA.

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, S. (1976). On the notion of subject in ergative languages. In Li, C. N. (ed.), Subject and topic. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M. (1973). Structural relationships in children's utterances: Syntactic or semantic? In Moore, T. E. (ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M. (1982). Reorganizational processes in lexical and syntactic development. In Wanner, E. & Gleitman, L. R. (eds), Language acquisition: the state of the art. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Braine, M. D. S. (1974). Length constraints, reduction rules, and holophrastic processes in children's word combinations. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 13. 488–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braine, M. D. S. (1976). Children's first word combinations. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 41. No 164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braine, M. D. S. (1987). What is learned in acquiring word classes – A step toward an acquisition theory. In MacWhinney, B. (ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Braine, M. D. S. & Hardy, J. A. (1982). On what case categories these are, why they are, and how they develop: an amalgam of a priori considerations, speculations, and evidence from children. In Wanner, E. & Gleitman, L. R. (eds), Language acquisition: the state of the art. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Clark, E. V. (1982). The young word maker: a case study of innovation in the child's lexicon. In Wanner, E. & Gleitman, L. R. (eds), Language acquisition: the state of the art. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. S. (1977). Constraints on phrase-structure rules. In Culicover, P. W., Wasow, T. & Akmajian, A. (eds), Formal syntax. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Keenan, E. L. (1976). Towards a universal definition of subject. In Li, C. N. (ed.), Subject and topic. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kaplan, R. M. & Bresnan, J. (1982). Lexical-functional grammar: a formal system for grammatical representation. In Bresnan, J. (ed.), The mental representation of grammatical relations. Cambridge MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Lieven, E. V. M. (1978). Turn-taking and pragmatics: two issues in early child language. In Campbell, R. N. & Smith, P. T. (eds), Recent advances in the psychology of language: language development and mother-child interaction. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Marantz, A. (1982). On the acquisition of grammatical relations. Linguistische Berichte: Linguistik als Kognitive Wissenschaft 80/82. 3269.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1982). A theory of the acquisition of lexical-interpretive grammars. In Bresnan, J. W. (ed.), The mental representation of grammatical relations. Cambridge MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Schieffelin, B. B. (1985). The acquisition of Kaluli. In Slobin, D. I. (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition. Vol. 1. The data. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, I. M. (1982). Steps to language: Toward a theory of language acquisition. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Wexler, K. & Culicover, P. W. (1980). Formal principles of language acquisition. Cambridge MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar