Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:33:47.623Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Still not adult-like: lexical stress contrastivity in word productions of eight- to eleven-year-olds*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2016

JOANNE ARCIULI  and
KIRRIE J. BALLARD
JOANNE ARCIULI*
Affiliation:
University of Sydney, Australia
KIRRIE J. BALLARD
Affiliation:
University of Sydney, Australia
*
Address for correspondence: Joanne Arciuli, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2000, Australia. e-mail: joanne.arciuli@sydney.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Lexical stress is the contrast between strong and weak syllables within words. Ballard et al. (2012) examined the amount of stress contrastivity across adjacent syllables in word productions of typically developing three- to seven-year-olds and adults. Here, eight- to eleven-year-olds are compared with the adults from Ballard et al. using acoustic measurements of relative contrast in duration, peak intensity, and peak fundamental frequency of the vowels within the initial two syllables of each word. While eight- to eleven-year-olds are closer to adult-like stress contrastivity than three- to seven-year-olds, they are not yet adult-like in terms of the intensity contrast for words beginning with a weak syllable.

Type
Brief Research Report
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 44 , Issue 5 , September 2017 , pp. 1274 - 1288
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

This research was supported by University of Sydney funds awarded to Joanne Arciuli. In addition, both authors were in receipt of research fellowships provided by the Australian Research Council. We thank the children who participated in this study and the research assistants who worked on the study, including Renae Nash and Natalia Henderson-Faranda.

References

REFERENCES

Allen, G. & Hawkins, S. (1980). Phonological rhythm: definition and development. In Yeni-Komshian, G., Kavanagh, J. & Ferguson, C. (eds), Child phonology: production, Vol. 1, 227–56. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Arciuli, J. (2014). Prosody and autism. In Arciuli, J. & Brock, J. (eds), Communication in autism, 103–22. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.Google Scholar
Arciuli, J. & Colombo, L. (2016). An acoustic investigation of the developmental trajectory of lexical stress contrastivity in Italian. Speech Communication 80, 22–33.Google Scholar
Arciuli, J. & Cupples, L. (2004). Effects of stress typicality during spoken word recognition by native and non-native speakers: evidence from onset-gating. Memory & Cognition 32, 21–30.Google Scholar
Arciuli, J. & Cupples, L. (2006). The processing of lexical stress during visual word recognition: typicality effects and orthographic correlates. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 59, 920–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arciuli, J., Monaghan, P. & Seva, N. (2010). Learning to assign lexical stress during reading aloud: corpus, behavioural and computational investigations. Journal of Memory and Language 63, 180–96.Google Scholar
Ballard, K. J., Djaja, D., Arciuli, J., James, D. G. & van Doorn, J. (2012). Developmental trajectory for production of prosody: lexical stress contrastivity in children ages 3 to 7 years and in adults. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 55, 1822–35.Google Scholar
Ballard, K. J., Robin, D. A., McCabe, P. & McDonald, J. (2010). A treatment for dysprosody in childhood apraxia of speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 53, 1227–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boersma, P. & Weenink, D. (2010). PRAAT (Version 5.2.0.1) [Computer software]. Amsterdam: Institute of Phonetic Sciences, online <http://www.praat.org>..>Google Scholar
Bohland, J. & Guenther, F. (2006). An fMRI investigation of syllable sequence production. Neuroimage 32(2), 821–41.Google Scholar
Chakraborty, R. & Goffman, L. (2011). Production of lexical stress in non-native speakers of American English: kinematic correlates of stress and transfer. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 54, 821–35.Google Scholar
Davis, B. L., MacNeilage, P. F., Matyear, C. L. & Powell, J. K. (2000). Prosodic correlates of stress in babbling: an acoustical study. Child Development 71, 1258–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DePaolis, R. A., Vihman, M. M. & Kunnari, S. (2008). Prosody in production at the onset of word use: a cross-linguistic study. Journal of Phonetics 36, 406–26.Google Scholar
Field, J. (2005). Intelligibility and the listener: the role of lexical stress. TESOL Quarterly 39, 399–424.Google Scholar
Frank, Y., Bergman, M. & Tobin, Y. (1987). Stress and intonation in the speech of hearing impaired Hebrew-speaking children. Language and Speech 30, 339–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goffman, L., Heisler, L. & Chakraborty, R. (2006). Mapping of prosodic structure onto words and phrases in children's and adults’ speech production. Language and Cognitive Processes 21, 25–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grabe, E. & Low, E. (2002). Durational variability in speech and the rhythm class hypothesis. In Warner, N. & Gussenhoven, C. (eds), Papers in laboratory phonology 7, 515–64. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guenther, F. H. (1995). Speech sound acquisition, coarticulation, and rate effects in a neural network model of speech production. Psychological Review 102, 594–621.Google Scholar
Guenther, F. H. & Vladusich, T. (2012). A neural theory of speech acquisition and production. Journal of Neurolinguistics 25, 408–22.Google Scholar
Hazan, V. & Barrett, R. (2000). The development of phonemic categorization in children aged 6–12 years. Journal of Phonetics 28, 377–96.Google Scholar
Jarmulowicz, L. D. (2002). English derivational suffix frequency and children's stress judgements. Brain and Language 81, 192–204.Google Scholar
Kehoe, M. M. (2001). Prosodic patterns in children's multisyllabic word productions. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 32, 284–94.Google Scholar
Kehoe, M. M., Stoel-Gammon, C. & Buder, E. (1995). Acoustic correlates of stress in young children's speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 38, 338–50.Google Scholar
Klopfenstein, M. (2009). Interaction between prosody and intelligibility. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 11, 326–31.Google Scholar
Kochanski, G., Grabe, E., Coleman, J. & Rosner, B. (2005). Loudness predicts prominence: fundamental frequency lends little. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 118, 1038–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, S., Potamianos, A. & Narayanan, S. (1999). Acoustics of children's speech: developmental changes of temporal and spectral parameters. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 105, 1455–68.Google Scholar
Lieberman, P. (1960). Some acoustic correlates of word stress in American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 32, 451–4.Google Scholar
Low, L. E., Grabe, E. & Nolan, F. (2000). Quantitative characterizations of speech rhythm: syllable-timing in Singapore English. Language and Speech 43, 377–401.Google Scholar
Nittrouer, S. (1996). Discriminability and perceptual weighting of some acoustic cues to speech perception by 3-year-olds. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 39, 278–97.Google Scholar
Nolan, F. & Asu, E. (2009). The pairwise variability index and coexisting rhythms in language. Phonetica 66, 64–77.Google Scholar
Paul, R., Shriberg, L. D., McSweeny, J., Cicchetti, D., Klin, A. & Volkmar, F. (2005). Relations between prosodic performance and communication and socialization ratings in high functioning speakers with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 35, 861–9.Google Scholar
Pollock, K. E., Brammer, D. M. & Hageman, C. F. (1993). An acoustic analysis of young children's productions of word stress. Journal of Phonetics 21, 183–203.Google Scholar
Roy, P. & Chiat, S. (2004). A prosodically controlled word and nonword repetition task for 2- to 4- year-olds: evidence from typically developing children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 47, 223–34.Google Scholar
Schwartz, R., Petinou, K., Goffman, L., Lazowski, G. & Cartusciello, C. (1996). Young children's production of syllable stress: an acoustic analysis. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 99, 3192–200.Google Scholar
Shport, I. A. & Redford, M. A. (2014). Lexical and phrasal prominence patterns in school-aged children's speech. Journal of Child Language 41, 890–912.Google Scholar
Shriberg, L. D., Campbell, T. F., Karlsson, H. B., Brown, R. L., McSweeny, J. L. & Nadler, C. J. (2003). A diagnostic marker for childhood apraxia of speech: the lexical stress ratio. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 17, 549–74.Google Scholar
Shriberg, L. D. & Widder, C. J. (1990). Speech and prosody characteristics of adults with mental retardation. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 33, 627–53.Google Scholar
Singh, L. & Singh, N. C. (2008). The development of articulatory signatures in children. Developmental Science 11, 467–473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, A. (2006). Speech motor development: integrating muscles, movements, and linguistic units. Journal of Communication Disorders 39, 331–49.Google Scholar
Vihman, M. M., DePaolis, R. & Davis, B. (1998). Is there a ‘trochaic bias’ in early word learning? Evidence from infant production in English and French. Child Development 69, 935–49.Google Scholar