Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T15:20:52.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What we have learned*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 July 2014

BRIAN MACWHINNEY
BRIAN MACWHINNEY*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 41 , Issue S1: Reflections: 40 years of JCL , July 2014 , pp. 124 - 131
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

e-mail: macw@cmu.edu

References

REFERENCES

Bates, Elizabeth & Goodman, Judith (1999). On the emergence of grammar from the lexicon. In MacWhinney, B. (ed.), The emergence of language, 29–80. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bishop, Dorothy (2013). Developmental cognitive genetics: how psychology can inform genetics and vice versa. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 59, 1153–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohannon, N. & Stanowicz, L. (1988). The issue of negative evidence: adult responses to children's language errors. Developmental Psychology 24, 684–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browman, C. P. & Goldstein, L. (1992). Articulatory phonology: an overview. Phonetica 49, 155–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, Roger (1958). How shall a thing be called? Psychological Review 65, 14–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, Angel, Lieven, Elena & Tomasello, Michael (2009). Children's understanding of the agent−patient relations in the transitive construction: cross-linguistic comparisons between Cantonese, German and English. Cognitive Linguistics 20, 267–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1959). Review of Skinner's “Verbal Behavior”. Language 35, 26–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and representations. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Alexander (2014). Learnability. In MacWhinnney, B. & O'Grady, W. (eds), Handbook of language emergence. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Clark, Eve (1987). The Principle of Contrast: a constraint on language acquisition. In MacWhinney, B. (ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition, 1–34. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Clark, Eve (2014). Common ground. In MacWhinney, B. & O'Grady, W. (eds), Handbook of language emergence. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Corina, David P., Vaid, Jyotsna & Bellugi, Ursula (1992). The linguistic basis of left hemisphere specialization. Science 255(5049), 1258–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corrigan, R. (1979). Cognitive correlates of language: differential criteria yield differential results. Child Development 50, 617–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruttenden, A. (1970). A phonetic study of babbling. British Journal of Disorders of Communication 5, 110–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, B. L. & MacNeilage, Peter F. (1995). The articulatory basis of babbling. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 38, 1199–211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Genesee, F., Boivin, I. & Nicolaidis, E. (1996). Talking with strangers: a study of bilingual children's communicative competence. Applied Psycholinguistics 17, 427–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gold, E. M. (1967). Language identification in the limit. Information and Control, 10, 447–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guion, S. G., Flege, J. E., Akahane-Yamada, R. & Pruitt, J. C. (2000). An investigation of current models of second language speech perception: the case of Japanese adults’ perception of English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 107, 2711–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hart, B. & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Howell, Peter (2011). Recovering from stuttering. New York: Psychology Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jakobson, R. (1968). Child language, aphasia and phonological universals. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karniol, Rachel (2010). Social development as preference management. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhl, Patricia (1991). Human adults and human infants show a ‘perceptual magnet effect’ for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not. Perception and Psychophysics 50, 93–107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacWhinney, Brian (1978). The acquisition of morphophonology. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 43(1), 1–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian (2004). A multiple process solution to the logical problem of language acquisition. Journal of Child Language 31, 883–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian (2005). Can our experiments illuminate reality? In Gershkoff-Stowe, L. & Rakison, D. (eds), Building object categories in developmental time, 301–8. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian (2012). The logic of the Unified Model. In Gass, S. & Mackey, A. (eds), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition, 211–27. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian (in press). Item-based patterns in early syntactic development. In Herbst, T. (ed.), Valency relations. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian, Feldman, Heidi, Sacco, Kelly & Valdes-Perez, Raul (2000). Online measures of basic language skills in children with early focal brain lesions. Brain and Language 71, 400–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacWhinney, Brian & Osser, H. (1977). Verbal planning functions in children's speech. Child Development 48, 978–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, Janet & MacWhinney, Brian (1991). Levels of learning: a microdevelopmental study of concept formation. Journal of Memory and Language 30, 407–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mervis, C. & Rosch, E. (1981). Categorization of natural objects. Annual Review of Psychology 32, 89–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newport, E, Gleitman, H. & Gleitman, L. (1977). Mother, I'd rather do it myself: some effects and noneffects of maternal speech style. In Snow, C. (Ed.), Talking to children: language input and acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O'Grady, William (2005). Syntactic carpentry. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oller, D. K. (2000). The emergence of the speech capacity. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelham, Sabra (2011). The input ambiguity hypothesis and case blindness: an account of cross-linguistic and intra-linguistic differences in case errors. Journal of Child Language 38, 235–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peters, A. M. & Strömqvist, S. (1996). The role of prosody in the acquisition of grammatical morphemes. In Morgan, J. & Demuth, K. (eds), From signal to syntax, 215–32. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Roelofs, Ardi (2011). Modeling the attentional control of vocal utterances: from Wernicke to WEAVER+. In Guendozi, J., Loncke, F. & Williams, M. (eds), The handbook of psycholinguistic and cognitive processes: perspectives in communication disorders, 189–208. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Roy, Brandon. (2013). The birth of a word. (Unpublished PhD thesis) MIT.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. (1985). Crosslinguistic evidence for the language-making capacity. In Slobin, D. (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition. Volume 2: theoretical issues, 1157–256. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Snow, Catherine E. (1999). Social perspectives on the emergence of language. In MacWhinney, B. (ed.), The emergence of language, 257–76. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Sokolov, J. L. (1993). A local contingency analysis of the fine-tuning hypothesis. Developmental Psychology 29, 1008–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiessen, Erik & Erickson, Lucy (2014). Perceptual development and statistical learning. In MacWhinney, B. & O'Grady, W. (eds), Handbook of language emergence. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael (2003). Constructing a language: a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Yip, V. & Matthews, S. (2007). The bilingual child: early development and language contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar