Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T23:58:19.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Early childhood language memory in the speech perception of international adoptees*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2009

JANET S. OH ,
TERRY KIT-FONG AU  and
SUN-AH JUN
JANET S. OH*
Affiliation:
California State University, Northridge
TERRY KIT-FONG AU
Affiliation:
The University of Hong Kong
SUN-AH JUN
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
*
Address for correspondence: Janet Oh, Department of Psychology, California State University, Northridge, 18111 Nordhoff Street, Northridge, CA 91330-8255. e-mail: janetoh@alum.pomona.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is as yet unclear whether the benefits of early linguistic experiences can be maintained without at least some minimal continued exposure to the language. This study compared 12 adults adopted from Korea to the US as young children (all but one prior to age one year) to 13 participants who had no prior exposure to Korean to examine whether relearning can aid in accessing early childhood language memory. All 25 participants were recruited and tested during the second week of first-semester college Korean language classes. They completed a language background questionnaire and interview, a childhood slang task and a Korean phoneme identification task. Results revealed an advantage for adoptee participants in identifying some Korean phonemes, suggesting that some components of early childhood language memory can remain intact despite many years of disuse, and that relearning a language can help in accessing such a memory.

Type
Brief Research Report
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 37 , Issue 5 , November 2010 , pp. 1123 - 1132
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

This work was supported by a grant from the University of Hong Kong (Au). The preparation of this paper was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation (Oh). We would like to thank Rich Lee, Hangtae Cho, Kim Park Gregg, Marissa Weyer, Sahyang Kim, Timothy Arbisi-Kelm and Kate Bell for their help with this study. These data were presented at the Boston University Conference on Language Development, November 2008.

References

REFERENCES

Au, T. K., Knightly, L. M., Jun, S.-A. & Oh, J. S. (2002). Overhearing a language during childhood. Psychological Science 13, 238–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Au, T. K., Oh, J. S., Knightly, L. M., Jun, S.-A. & Romo, L. F. (2008). Salvaging a childhood language. Journal of Memory and Language 58, 998–1011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bjork, E. L. & Bjork, R. A. (1996). Continuing influences of to-be-forgotten information. Consciousness and Cognition 5, 176–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bjork, R. A. & Bjork, E. L. (2006). Optimizing treatment and instruction: Implications of a new theory of disuse. In Nilsson, L.-G. & Ohta, N. (eds), Memory and society: Psychological perspectives, 109–133. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Cho, T., Jun, S.-A. & Ladefoged, P. (2002). Acoustic and aerodynamic correlates of Korean stops and fricatives. Journal of Phonetics 30, 193–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fromkin, V., Krashen, S., Curtiss, S., Rigler, D. & Rigler, M. (1974). The development of language in Genie: A case of language acquisition beyond the ‘critical period’. Brain and Language 1, 81–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, J. D. (1952). Remarks on the determination of a differential threshold by the so-called ABX technique. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 24, 417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J. S. & Newport, E. L. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology 21, 60–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knightly, L. M., Jun, S.-A., Oh, J. S. & Au, T. K. (2003). Production benefits of childhood overhearing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 114, 465–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koluchova, J. (1972). Severe deprivation in twins: A case study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 13, 107–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koluchova, J. (1976). The further development of twins after severe and prolonged deprivation: A second report. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 17, 181–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liberman, A. M., Harris, K. S., Hoffman, H. S. & Griffith, B. C. (1957). The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology 54, 358–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oh, J. S., Jun, S.-A., Knightly, L. M. & Au, T. K. (2003). Holding on to childhood language memory. Cognition 86, B53–B64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oyama, S. (1976). A sensitive period for the acquisition of a nonnative phonological system. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 5, 261–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pallier, C., Dehaene, S., Poline, J.-B., LeBihan, D., Argenti, A.-M., Dupoux, E. & Mehler, J. (2003). Brain imaging of language plasticity in adopted adults: Can a second language replace the first? Cerebral Cortex 13, 155–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneider, W., Eschmann, A. & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime user's guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools, Inc.Google Scholar
Tees, R. C. & Werker, J. F. (1984). Perceptual flexibility: Maintenance or recovery of the ability to discriminate non-native speech sounds. Canadian Journal of Psychology 38, 579–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ventureyra, V. A. G., Pallier, C. & Yoo, H.-Y. (2004). The loss of first language phonetic perception in adopted Koreans. Journal of Neurolinguistics 17, 79–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werker, J. F. (1989). Becoming a native listener: A developmental perspective on human speech perception. American Scientist 77, 54–59.Google Scholar