Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g5fl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T12:22:47.490Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Native Spanish language acquisition: the effect of age, schooling and context on responses to ‘dile’ and ‘pregúntale’*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Carole Edelsky  and
Virginia Muiña
Carole Edelsky
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
Virginia Muiña
Affiliation:
Florida International University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The ability to distinguish ask and tell in Spanish was studied with five groups of native Spanish speakers: adults, 7- and 10-year-olds in a full-bilingual-programme school (BISO), and 7- and 10-year-olds in a non-total BISO school. The interviews included context-present and context-absent items. Differences in these subjects' responses and those elicited by Chomsky (1969) among children acquiring English are explored. Increased age, bilingual schooling, and presence of contextual clues enhanced performance. Relative difficulty of dile and pregúntale, stages in distinguishing these in three types of constructions, and comparisons of first and second language performance are discussed.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 4 , Issue 3 , October 1977 , pp. 453 - 475
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brisk, M. (1972). The Spanish syntax of the pre-school Spanish American: the case of New Mexican five-year-old children. Doctoral dissertation, University of New Mexico.Google Scholar
Cambon, J. & Sinclair, H. (1974). Relations between syntax and semantics: are they ‘easy to see’? BrjPsych 65. 133–40.Google Scholar
Carrow, E. (1971). Comprehension of English and Spanish by pre-school Mexican-American children. MLJ 55. 299–306.Google Scholar
Chomsky, C. (1969). The aquisition of syntax in children from 5 to 10. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar
Clark, E. (1971). Review of Chomsky (1969). Lg 47. 742–9.Google Scholar
Cromer, R. (1970). ‘Children are nice to understand’: surface structure clues for the recovery of a deep structure. BrjPsych 61. 397–408.Google Scholar
González, G. (1975). The acquisition of grammatical structures by Mexican-American children. In Hernández-Chávez, E., Cohen, A., & Beltramo, A. (eds), El lenguaje de los chicanos. Arlington, Va.: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Ingram, D. (1975). If and when transformations are acquired by children. In Dato, D. (ed.), Developmental psycholinguistics: theory and applications. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Macnamara, J. (1970). Review of Chomsky (1969). GenLing 10. 164–72.Google Scholar
Maratsos, M. (1974). How preschool children understand missing complement subjects. ChDev 45. 700–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Popham, J. (1967). Educational statistics. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Sacks, H. (1972). On the analyzability of stories by children. In Gumperz, J. & Hymes, D. (eds), Directions in sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Serrano, R. (1971). The language of the four-year-old Chicano. ED 071 791.Google Scholar
Spolsky, B. (1968). What does it mean to know a language, or how do you get someone to perform his competence? Paper given at the Second Conference on Problems in Foreign Language Testing.Google Scholar