Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T11:48:59.159Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

616. The size of the fat globules in the milk of diseased cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

J. O. L. King
J. O. L. King
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool Veterinary Field Station, Neston, Wirral
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The results of examining the fat globule size in milk samples from thirty-one cows which were in-patients in a Veterinary Hospital, have been recorded. Eleven of these cows did not develop a body temperature over 102·4° F., and samples collected on the second day after admission and 5 days later were examined and compared. Although the rise in yield was significant, the differences in fat percentage and fat globule size were not. The other twenty cows developed raised body temperatures, and the association between body temperature and milk composition was considered in the following temperature ranges: 104° F. or over, from 102·5–103·9° F., and 102·4° F. or below. The results showed that a rise in body temperature was accompanied by a fall in yield and also by an increase in the fat percentage and in the average fat globule diameter.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , February 1956 , pp. 105 - 110
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Turner, C. W. & Haskell, A. C. (1929). Bull. M o. agric. Exp. Sta. no. 130. 4.Google Scholar
(2)Collier, P. (1891–1892). N.Y. (St.) Sta. Rep. no. 10, 129.Google Scholar
(3)Gaines, W. L. (1915). Amer. J. Physiol. 38, 285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Johansson, I. (1952). Acta agric. Scand. 2, 82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)Johansson, I., Korkman, N. & Nelson, N. J. (1952). Acta agric. Scand. 2, 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6)Woll, F. W. (1894). Rep. Wis. agric. Exp. Sta. 11, 223.Google Scholar
(7)Eckles, C. H. & Shaw, R. H. (1913). Bull. U.S. Bur. Anim. Ind. no. 155.Google Scholar
(8)Woll, F. W. (1889–1890). Rep. Wis. agric. Exp. Sta. 6, 99.Google Scholar
(9)Gutzeit, E. (1895). Landw. Jb. 24, 539.Google Scholar
(10)Weigmann, H. H. (1926). Milchw. Forsch. 4, 259.Google Scholar
(11)Campbell, M. H. (1932). Bull. Vt. agric. Exp. Sta. no. 341.Google Scholar
(12)Woll, F. W. (1892). Agric. Sci. 6, 441.Google Scholar
(13)Mackie, T. J. & McCartney, J. E. (1953). Handbook of Practical Bacteriology, 9th ed., p. 75. Edinburgh: E. and F. Livingstone Ltd.Google Scholar
(14)King, J. O. L. (1955). Vet. Rec. 67, 432.Google Scholar