Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T22:55:32.240Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Adsorption of casein components by halloysite and kaolinite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

O. E. Mills  and
L. K. Creamer
O. E. Mills
Affiliation:
New Zealand Dairy Research Institute, P.O. Box 1204, Palmerston North, New Zealand
L. K. Creamer
Affiliation:
New Zealand Dairy Research Institute, P.O. Box 1204, Palmerston North, New Zealand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The adsorption of whole casein and some of its constituent caseins by halloysite and kaolinite in the presence and absence of urea and 2-mercaptoethanol has been studied. The order of adsorption generally observed for both clays in the absence of urea and 2-mercaptoethanol was temperature sensitive casein component (TS) > αs1-casein B > αs1-casein A > β-casein in the pH range 7·5–9·5, confirming that these two clays have structurally similar surfaces. In the presence of urea and 2-mercaptoethanol the rate of adsorption on to halloysite increased, although the quantity adsorbed decreased and the relative affinities of the major casein components at pH 8 were altered. However, urea and 2-mercaptoethanol did not alter the relative affinities of the caseins to kaolinite, although the quantity adsorbed did decrease. The casein components are probably adsorbed as monomers, and it may be the superior dispersing properties of the urea solution that decrease the amount adsorbed. The halloysite structure was altered by absorption of urea and the altered relative affinities of the various casein components in the presence of urea can be ascribed to that effect.

The results support the hypothesis that adsorption occurs because the energy of the system is lowered due to changes in protein-solvent, clay-solvent and solvent-solvent (solvent structuring), as well as to electrostatic interactions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 39 , Issue 3 , October 1972 , pp. 365 - 372
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Davis, B. J. (1964). Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 121, 404.Google Scholar
Dolby, R. M. (1961). Journal of Dairy Research 28, 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, M. T. A., Irons, L. & Petty, J. H. P. (1971). Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 243, 259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grim, R. E. (1968). Clay Mineralogy, 2nd edn.New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Grosclaude, F., Mahé, M. F., Mercier, J. C. & Ribadeau-Dumas, B. (1970). FEBS Letters 11, 109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groves, M. L. (1969). Journal of Dairy Science 52, 1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hang, P. T. H. & Brindley, G. W. (1970). Clays and Clay Minerals 18, 203.Google Scholar
Herskovits, T. T. (1966). Biochemistry 5, 1018.Google Scholar
Hofmann, U. & Reingraber, R. (1969). Zeitschrift für Anorganische und Allgemeine Chemie 369, 208.Google Scholar
Mills, O. E. & Creamer, L. K. (1971). New Zealand Journal of Dairy Science and Technology 6, 61.Google Scholar
Ornstein, L. (1964). Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 121, 321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanford, C. (1970). Advances in Protein Chemistry 24, 90.Google Scholar
Thompson, M. P., Farrell, H. M. Jr & Greenberg, R. (1969). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 28, 471.Google Scholar
van Olphen, H. (1963). An Introduction to Clay Colloid Chemistry. New York: Interscience.Google Scholar
von Hippel, P. H. & Schleich, T. (1969). In Biological Macromolecules 2, 243. (Eds Timasheff, S. and Fasman, G..) New York: Dekker.Google Scholar
Waugh, D. F., Creamer, L. K., Slattery, C. W. & Dresdner, G. W. (1970). Biochemistry 9, 786.Google Scholar