Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T22:32:44.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of a disinfectant udder wash and a post-milking teat dip on the bacterial population of the teat end and on the rate of new intramammary infection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Richard F. Sheldrake
Affiliation:
New South Wales Department of Agriculture, Veterinary Research Station, Glenfield, N.S.W. 2167, Australia
Roderic J. T. Hoare
Affiliation:
New South Wales Department of Agriculture, Veterinary Research Station, Glenfield, N.S.W. 2167, Australia

Summary

A pre-milking wash disinfectant procedure employing a 2% (w/v) chlorhexidine solution in a detergent base did not reduce the rate of new intramammary infection in a lactating herd challenged with Staphylococcus aureus. Teat-end swabs showed no significant difference in the number of Staph aureus isolated from the teat-ends pre-washed with either water, or water and chlorhexidine. In contrast, disinfecting teats after milking with a solution containing 5000 mg available iodine/1 significantly reduced the staphylococcal population of the teat-ends and the rate of new intramammary infection, compared with teats not disinfected.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bramley, A. J., Higgs, T. M., King, J. S., Neave, F. K., Cousins, C. L. & Cramp, D. G. (1973). BiennialReview, National Institute for Research in Dairying 1971–72, p. 63.Google Scholar
Brookbanks, E. O. (1965). New Zealand Veterinary Journal 13, 163166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, I. (1961). Research in Veterinary Science 2, 2240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, S. J. & Smith, G. S. (1970). British Veterinary Journal 126, 106111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, T. K., Dodd, F. H., Neave, F. K., Westgarth, D. R., Kingwill, R. G. & Wilson, C. D. (1977). Journal of Dairy Research 44, 2545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoare, R. J. T., Critchley, D. J., Dettmann, E. B., Sheldrake, R. F. & Fell, L. R. (1979). Australian Journal of Dairy Technology 34, 9196.Google Scholar
Hoare, R. J. T. & Roberts, E. A. (1972). Australian Veterinary Journal 48, 661663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, D. L. (1953). Veterinary Record 65, 111.Google Scholar
Lowbury, E. J. L., Lilly, H. A. & Bull, J. P. (1963). British Medical Journal i, 12511256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowbury, E. J. L., Lilly, H. A. & Bull, J. P. (1964). British Medical Journal ii, 230233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, J. S. (1970). American Journal of Veterinary Research 31, 233240.Google Scholar
Neave, F. K. (1971). In The Control of Bovine Mastitis, p. 5571. (Eds Dodd, F. H. & Jackson., E. R.) British Cattle Veterinary Association.Google Scholar
Newbould, F. H. S. & Barnum, D. A. (1958). Journal of Milk and Food Technology 21, 306308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Shea, J. & Meaney, W. J. (1979). Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 18, 3743.Google Scholar
O'shea, J., Meaney, W. J., Langley, O. H. & Palmer, J. (1975). Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 14, 99105.Google Scholar
Price, P. B. (1938). Journal of Infectious Diseases 63, 301318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultze, W. D. & Smith, J. W. (1970). Journal of Dairy Science 53, 38–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheldrake, R. F. & Hoare, R. J. T. (1980). Journal of Dairy Research 47, 2731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheldrake, R. F., Hoare, R. J. T. & Hutchinson, J. E. (1980). Journal of Dairy Research 47, 1926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wesen, D. P. & Schultz, L. H. (1970). Journal of Dairy Science 53, 13911403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, C. D. (1955). Veterinary Record 67, 645650.Google Scholar
Zarkower, A. & Scheuchenzuber, W. J. (1977). Cornell Veterinarian 67, 404412.Google Scholar