Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T11:42:42.116Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of new n-3 fatty acid sources on milk fatty acid profile and milk fat properties in dairy cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 June 2018

Elise Vanbergue ,
Jean-Louis Peyraud  and
Catherine Hurtaud
Elise Vanbergue
Affiliation:
PEGASE, Agrocampus Ouest, INRA, 35590, Saint-Gilles, France Institut de l’élevage, Monvoisin, 35910, Le Rheu, France
Jean-Louis Peyraud
Affiliation:
PEGASE, Agrocampus Ouest, INRA, 35590, Saint-Gilles, France
Catherine Hurtaud*
Affiliation:
PEGASE, Agrocampus Ouest, INRA, 35590, Saint-Gilles, France
*
*For correspondence; e-mail: catherine.hurtaud@inra.fr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Feeding livestock with n-3 fatty acid (FA) sources (linseed, for example) is a common strategy to improve lipid quality of meat and milk products. However, in monogastric animals, linseed tegument decreases digestibility and alphalinolenic acid (ALA) uptake, while the whole linseed is well used by ruminants. In a context of increasing sustainability of feeding systems, providing monogastric animals and ruminants with linseed products adapted to their digestive systems is an important issue. This research paper addresses the hypotheses: (i) sieved extruded linseed (SEL) specific for ruminants is as or more effective than standard extruded linseed (ii) microalgae DHA Gold® is an interesting source of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) in feedstuff and (iii) the effects of SEL and microalgae on milk characteristics are complementary and additive. Thirty-two cows were divided into 4 groups with different dietary n-3 fatty acid sources using a continuous design. All the diets were fed as mixed rations based on maize silage, energy concentrate and soybean meal. The first group received a control diet (CTRL) with no additional fat. The 3 other groups received SEL, microalgae DHA Gold® (ALG) and a mixture of microalgae DHA Gold® and SEL (SEL/ALG). Milk was collected from morning milkings after six weeks of dietary treatment. In SEL and SEL/ALG, ALA increased (+0·32 and +0·26% unit, respectively), and DHA increased in ALG and SEL/ALG (+0·43 and +0·15% unit, respectively) compared to CTRL, as a consequence of the initial composition of the n-3 FA sources. In SEL, milk yield, fat and protein contents, milk fat globule size and spontaneous lipolysis (measured to evaluate suitability for milk processing) were not different compared with CTRL. In ALG and SEL/ALG, milk yield decreased (−2·8 and −6·0 kg/d, respectively), fat content was halved, and fat globule size was reduced (−1·46 and −1·31 µm, respectively) compared to CTRL. Spontaneous lipolysis increased in ALG (+0·12 mEq/kg of milk) compared to CTRL. Protected microalgae and the doses of microalgae in the diet need further investigation to prevent FA modification in the rumen and the consequent deleterious effects on milk fat.

Keywords

Flaxseedmilk qualitymicroalgaedairy cowlipolysis
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 85 , Issue 3 , August 2018 , pp. 265 - 272
Copyright
Copyright © Hannah Dairy Research Foundation 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AbuGhazaleh, AA, Potu, RB & Ibrahim, S 2009 Short communication: the effect of substituting fish oil in dairy cow diets with docosahexaenoic acid-micro algae on milk composition and fatty acids profile. Journal of Dairy Science 92 6156–6159Google Scholar
Angulo, J, Mahecha, L, Nuernberg, K, Nuernberg, G, Dannenberger, D, Olivera, M, Boutinaud, M, Leroux, C, Albrecht, E & Bernard, L 2012 Effects of polyunsaturated fatty acids from plant oils and algae on milk fat yield and composition are associated with mammary lipogenic and SREBF1 gene expression. Animal 6 1961–1972Google Scholar
Baeza, E, Chartrin, P, Gigaud, V, Tauty, S, Meteau, K, Lessire, M, & Berri, C 2013 Effects of dietary enrichment with n–3 fatty acids on the quality of raw and processed breast meat of high and low growth rate chickens. British Poultry Science 54 190–198Google Scholar
Boeckaert, C, Vlaeminck, B, Dijkstra, J, Issa-Zacharia, A, Van Nespen, T, Van Straalen, W & Fievez, V 2008 Effect of dietary starch or microalgae supplementation on rumen fermentation and milk fatty acid composition of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 91 4714–4727Google Scholar
Bragaglio, A, Braghieri, A, Napolitano, F, De Rosa, G, Riviezzi, AM, Surianello, F, Pacelli, C 2015 Omega-3 supplementation, milk quality and cow immune-competence. Italian Journal of Agronomy 10 9–14Google Scholar
Briard-Bion, V, Juaneda, P, Richoux, R, Guichard, E & Lopez, C 2008 Trans-C18:1 isomers in cheeses enriched in unsaturated fatty acids and manufactured with different milk fat globule sizes. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 56 9374–9382Google Scholar
Calder, PC & Yaqoob, P 2009 Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and human health outcomes. BioFactors 35 266–272Google Scholar
Cartier, P & Chilliard, Y 1990 Spontaneous lipolysis in bovine milk: combined effects of nine characteristics in native milk. Journal of Dairy Science 73 1178–1186Google Scholar
Chilliard, Y, Glasser, F, Ferlay, A, Bernard, L, Rouel, J & Doreau, M 2007 Diet, rumen biohydrogenation and nutritional quality of cow and goat milk fat. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology 109 828–855Google Scholar
Chilliard, Y, Martin, C, Rouel, J & Doreau, M 2009 Milk fatty acids in dairy cows fed whole crude linseed, extruded linseed or linseed oil, and their relationship with methane output. Journal of Dairy Science 92 5199–5211Google Scholar
Couvreur, S & Hurtaud, C 2017. Relationships between milks differentiated on native milk fat globule characteristics and fat, protein and calcium compositions. Animal 11 507–518Google Scholar
De Tonnac, A, Karim-Luisset, S & Mourot, J 2017. Effect of different dietary linseed sources on fatty acid composition in pig tissues. Livestock Science 203 124–131Google Scholar
Ferlay, A, Doreau, M, Martin, C & Chilliard, Y 2013 Effects of incremental amounts of extruded linseed on the milk fatty acid composition of dairy cows receiving hay or corn silage. Journal of Dairy Science 96 6577–6595Google Scholar
Gonthier, C, Mustafa, AF, Berthiaume, R, Petit, HV, Martineau, R & Ouellet, DR 2004. Effects of feeding micronized and extruded flaxseed on ruminal fermentation and nutrient utilization by dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 87 1854–1863Google Scholar
Gonthier, C, Mustafa, AF, Ouellet, DR, Chouinard, PY, Berthiaume, R & Petit, HV 2005 Feeding micronized and extruded flaxseed to dairy cows: effects on blood parameters and milk fatty acid composition. Journal of Dairy Science 88 748–756Google Scholar
Hurtaud, C, Faucon, F, Couvreur, S & Peyraud, JL 2010 Linear relationship between increasing amounts of extruded linseed in dairy cow diet and milk fatty acid composition and butter properties. Journal of Dairy Science 93 1429–1443Google Scholar
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA) 2007 Ruminant Nutrition: Recommended Allowances and Feed Tables (Ed. Jarrige, R), London, UK: John Libbey Chapter 3 Protein the PDI systeme pp 33–47Google Scholar
Kadivar, M 2001 Studies on integrated processes for the recovery of mucilage, hull, oil and protein from Solin (low linolenic acid flax). PhD, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, pp. 177Google Scholar
Livingstone, KM, Humphries, DJ, Kirton, P, Kliem, KE, Givens, DI & Reynolds, CK 2015 Effects of forage type and extruded linseed supplementation on methane production and milk fatty acid composition of lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 98 4000–4011Google Scholar
Lu, J, Argov-Argaman, N, Anggrek, J, Boeren, S, van Hooijdonk, T, Vervoort, J & Hettinga, KA 2016 The protein and lipid composition of the membrane of milk fat globules depends on their size. Journal of Dairy Science 99 4726–4738Google Scholar
Martin, C, Rouel, J, Jouany, JP, Doreau, M & Chilliard, Y 2008. Methane output and diet digestibility in response to feeding dairy cows crude linseed, extruded linseed, or linseed oil. Journal of Animal Science 86 2642–2650Google Scholar
Meignan, T, Lechartier, C, Chesneau, G & Bareille, N 2017 Effects of feeding extruded linseed on production performance and milk fatty acid profile in dairy cows: a meta-analysis. Journal of Dairy Science 100 4394–4408Google Scholar
Neveu, C, Baurhoo, B & Mustafa, A 2014 Effect of feeding extruded flaxseed with different grains on the performance of dairy cows and milk fatty acid profile. Journal of Dairy Science 97 1543–1551Google Scholar
Noblet, J, Jaguelin-Peyraud, Y, Quemeneur, B & Chesneau, G 2008 [Energy value of linseed in pigs: impact of extrusion technology]. Journées de la Recherche Porcine 40 203–208Google Scholar
Shingfield, KJ, Bernard, L, Leroux, C & Chilliard, Y 2010 Role of trans fatty acids in the nutritional regulation of mammary lipogenesis in ruminants. Animal 4 1140–1166Google Scholar
Stamey, JA, Shepherd, DM, de Veth, MJ & Corl, BA 2012 Use of algae or algal oil rich in n-3 fatty acids as a feed supplement for dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 95 5269–5275Google Scholar
Vanbergue, E 2017. [Factors of variation in spontaneous lipolysis of cow's milk and associated mechanisms.] PhD, Agrocampus Ouest, Université Bretagne Loire, 244 ppGoogle Scholar
Vanbergue, E, Peyraud, JL, Guinard-Flament, J, Charton, C, Barbey, S, Lefebvre, R, Gallard, Y & Hurtaud, C 2016 Effects of DGAT1 K232A polymorphism and milking frequency on milk composition and spontaneous lipolysis in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 99 5739–5749Google Scholar
Vanbergue, E, Delaby, L, Peyraud, JL, Colette, S, Gallard, Y & Hurtaud, C 2017 Effects of breed, feeding system and lactation stage on milk fat characteristics and spontaneous lipolysis in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 100 4623–4636Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Vanbergue et al. supplementary material

Vanbergue et al. supplementary material 1

Download Vanbergue et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 92.5 KB