Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:01:06.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Estimating the impact of somatic cell count on the value of milk utilising parameters obtained from the published literature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2014

Una Geary ,
Nicolas Lopez-Villalobos ,
Bernadette O'Brien ,
Dorian J Garrick  and
Laurence Shalloo
Una Geary*
Affiliation:
Livestock Systems Research Department, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland
Nicolas Lopez-Villalobos
Affiliation:
Institute of Veterinary, Animal and Biomedical Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
Bernadette O'Brien
Affiliation:
Livestock Systems Research Department, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland
Dorian J Garrick
Affiliation:
Institute of Veterinary, Animal and Biomedical Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
Laurence Shalloo
Affiliation:
Livestock Systems Research Department, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland
*
*For correspondence; e-mail: una.geary@hotmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The impact of mastitis on milk value per litre independent of the effect of mastitis on milk volume, was quantified for Ireland using a meta-analysis and a processing sector model. Changes in raw milk composition, cheese processing and composition associated with increased bulk milk somatic cell count (BMSCC) were incorporated into the model. Processing costs and market values were representative of current industry values. It was assumed that as BMSCC increased (i) milk fat and milk protein increased and milk lactose decreased, (ii) fat and protein recoveries decreased, (iii) cheese protein decreased and cheese moisture increased. Five BMSCC categories were examined from ⩽100 000 to >400 000 cells/ml. The analysis showed that as BMSCC increased the production quantities reduced. An increase in BMSCC from 100 000 to >400 000 cells/ml saw a reduction in net revenue of 3·2% per annum (€51·3 million) which corresponded to a reduction in the value of raw milk of €0·0096 cents/l.

Keywords

mastitissomatic cell countprocessorcheesemilk
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 81 , Issue 2 , May 2014 , pp. 223 - 232
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Auldist, MJ 2000 Effects of mastitis on raw milk and dairy products. In proceedings of: Pacific Congress on milk quality and mastitis control. November 13–16, Nagano, Japan, pp. 191–204Google Scholar
Auldist, MJ, Coats, ST, Sutherland, BJ, Clarke, PT, McDowell, GH & Rogers, GL 1996 Effect of somatic cell count and stage of lactation on the quality of full cream milk powder. Australian Journal of Dairy Technology 51 94–98Google Scholar
Barbano, D & Lynch, J 1999 Fact sheet-Milk protein testing-FAQ's. Changing from crude protein to true protein. http://future.aae.wisc.edu/publications/milk_protein_testing.pdf (accessed 20/08/2012)Google Scholar
Barbano, DM, Rasmussen, RR & Lynch, JM 1991 Influence of milk somatic cell count and milk age on cheese yield 1. Journal of Dairy Science 74 369–388Google Scholar
Berry, DP, O'Brien, B, O'Callaghan, EJ, Sullivan, KO & Meaney, WJ 2006 Temporal trends in bulk tank somatic cell count and total bacterial count in Irish dairy herds during the past decade. Journal of Dairy Science 89 4083–4093CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cazoto, LL, Martins, D, Ribeiro, MG, Durán, N & Nakazato, G 2011 Antibacterial activity of violacein against Staphylococcus aureus isolated from Bovine Mastitis. The Journal of Antibiotics, 64 395–397Google Scholar
Central Statistics Office Ireland 2011 Intake of Cows Milk by Creameries and Pasteurisers by Month, Domestic or Import Source and Statistic. Cork, Ireland: Central Statistics Office. http://www.cso.ie/px/pxeirestat/Dialog/varval.asp?ma=AKM01&ti=Intake%20of%20Cows%20Milk%20by%20Creameries%20and%20Pasteurisers%20by%20Month,%20Domestic%20or%20Import%20Source%20and%20Statistic&path=/px/pxeirestat/Database/Eirestat/Agriculture%20Milk%20Production/&lang=1 (verified 27 March 2013)Google Scholar
CLAL 2011 website accessed 27/03/2013. http://www.clal.it/en/index.php?section=caseineGoogle Scholar
Crombie, I & Davies, HT 2009 What is meta-analysis? In: What is…? Series, Second Edition, Evidence Based Medicine. NPR09/1112. http://www.medicine.ox.ac.uk/bandolier/painres/download/whatis/meta-an.pdfGoogle Scholar
Datum UK 2011 website accessed 27/03/2013. http://www.dairyco.org.uk/datum/dairy-processing--trade/wholesale-prices/uk-wholesale-prices.aspxGoogle Scholar
Denis, M, Wedlock, DN, Lacy-Hulbert, SJ, Hillerton, JE & Buddle, BM 2009 Vaccines against bovine mastitis in the New Zealand context: What is the best way forward? New Zealand Veterinary Journal 57 132–140CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doggweiler, R & Hess, E 1983 Zellgehalt in der Mich ungeschädigter Euter. Milchwissenschaft 38 167–188Google Scholar
FAOSTAT 2010 Agriculture statistics 2000–2009. http://faostat.fao.org/site/603/DesktopDefault.aspx?PageID=603#ancorGoogle Scholar
Geary, U, Lopez-Villalobos, N, Garrick, DJ & Shalloo, L 2010 Development and application of a processing model for the Irish dairy industry. Journal of Dairy Science 93 5091–5100CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geary, U, Lopez-Villalobos, N, Begley, N, McCoy, F, O'Brien, B, O'Grady, L & Shalloo, L 2012a Estimating the effect of mastitis on the profitability of Irish dairy farms. Journal of Dairy Science 95 3662–3673CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geary, U, Lopez-Villalobos, N, Garrick, DJ & Shalloo, L 2012b An analysis of the implications of a change to the seasonal milk supply profile in the Irish dairy industry utilising a seasonal processing sector model. Journal of Agricultural Science 150 389–407Google Scholar
Guinee, T, Mulholland, EO, Kelly, J & O'Callaghan, DJ 2007 Effect of protein-to-fat ratio of milk on the composition, manufacturing efficiency, and yield of Cheddar cheese. Journal of Dairy Science 90 110–123Google Scholar
Hickey, DK, Kilcawley, KN, Beresford, TP, Sheehan, EM & Wilkinson, MG 2006 The influence of a seasonal milk supply on the biochemical and sensory properties of Cheddar cheese. International Dairy Journal 16 679–690Google Scholar
Hogeveen, H, Huijps, K, Halasa, T & Lam, TJGM 2010 Mastitis costs money: Whats new. In proceedings: Mastitis research into practice: Proceedings of the 5th IDF mastitis conferenceGoogle Scholar
Huijps, K, Lam, TJGM & Hogeveen, H 2008 Costs of mastitis: facts and perception. Journal of Dairy Research 75 113–120CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huijps, K, Hogeveen, H, Antonides, G, Valeeva, N, Lam, TJGM & Oude Lansink, AGJM 2010 Sub-optimal economic behaviour with respect to mastitis management. European Review of Agricultural Economics 37 553–568Google Scholar
International Dairy Federation 1997 Recommendations for Presentation of Mastitis-Related Data. Bulletin No 321/1997. Brussels, Belgium: International Dairy FederationGoogle Scholar
Kromker, V, Grabowski, NT, Redetzky, R & Hamann, J 2001 Detection of mastitis using selected quarter milk parameters. 2nd Intl. Symp. Bovine Mastitis and Milk Quality. Vancouver, Canada, pp. 486–487Google Scholar
Ma, Y, Ryan, C, Barbano, DM, Galton, DM, Rudan, MA & Boor, KJ 2000 Effects of somatic cell count on quality and shelf-life of pasteurized fluid milk. Journal of Dairy Science 83 264–274CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malcolm, D, Hook, I, Montgomerie, B, Winkleman, A, Sim, S & Brennan, G 2005 The cost of mastitis. Dairy Insight Research 2005/2006 Final Report. National Mastitis Advisory Committee, Hamilton, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
National Farm Survey Results 2011 Teagasc, Dairy Enterprise. http://www.teagasc.ie/publications/2012/1398/DairyFactsheet2011-TeagascNFS.pdf (accessed 15/01/2013)Google Scholar
Nightingale, C, Dhuyvetter, K & Schukken, Y 2008 Influence of variable milk quality premiums on observed milk quality. Journal of Dairy Science 91 1236–1244CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Politis, I & Ng-Kwai-Hang, KF 1988 Association between somatic cell count of milk and cheese-yielding capacity. Journal of Dairy Science 71 1720–1727Google Scholar
Productschap Zuivel 2011 http://www.prodzuivel.nl/pz/noteringen/Buitenland_Prijzen_perland_2010.pdf (accessed 27/03/2013)Google Scholar
Quinlan, C, Keane, M, O'Connor, D & Shalloo, L 2010 The transport implications for Ireland of the elimination of 1008 the milk quota regime in 2015. In Proceedings of the Irish 1009 Transport Research Network Conference 2010, 31 1010 August–1 September 2010, University College Dublin, 1011 Ireland (Eds Gosh, B & Murray, R), Part 9, Paper 1. Dublin: 1012 ITRN. http://www.itrn.ie/uploads/Part% 1013 209.pdf (verified 5 June 2013)Google Scholar
Rogers, SA & Mitchell, GE 1989 The relationship between somatic cell count composition and manufacturing properties of bulk milk 5. Pasteurised milk and skim milk powder. Australian Journal of Dairy Technology 44 57–60Google Scholar
Santos, MV, Ma, Y & Barbano, DM 2003 Effect of somatic cell count on proteolysis and lipolysis in pasteurized fluid milk during shelf-life storage. Journal of Dairy Science 86 2491–2503Google Scholar
SAS 2010 SAS/STAT Version 9.3 SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
Shalloo, L, Dillon, P, Rath, M & Wallace, M 2004 Description and validation of the Moorepark Dairy System Model. Journal of Dairy Science 87 945–1959CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
St-Pierre, NR 2001 Invited review: integrating quantitative findings from multiple studies using mixed model methodology. Journal of Dairy Science 84 741–755CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Slyke, L & Price, W 1949 Cheese. New York, NY: Orange Judd Publ. Co. Inc.Google Scholar
Valeeva, NI, Lam, TJGM & Hogeveen, H 2007 Motivation of dairy farmers to improve mastitis management. Journal of Dairy Science 90 4466–4477Google Scholar
Wiggans, GR & Shook, GE 1987 A lactation measure of somatic cell count. Journal of Dairy Science 70 266–267Google Scholar