Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:34:49.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Herd-level and territorial-level factors influencing average herd somatic cell count in France in 2005 and 2006

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2012

Didier Raboisson ,
Marie Dervillé ,
Nicolas Herman ,
Eric Cahuzac ,
Pierre Sans  and
Gilles Allaire
Didier Raboisson*
Affiliation:
Université de Toulouse, INP, ENVT, 23 chemin des Capelles, BP 87614, F-31076 Toulouse Cedex 3, France Observatoire des programmes communautaires de développement rural, US 0685, INRA Toulouse, chemin de Borde-Rouge, F-31326 Auzeville, France
Marie Dervillé
Affiliation:
Observatoire des programmes communautaires de développement rural, US 0685, INRA Toulouse, chemin de Borde-Rouge, F-31326 Auzeville, France
Nicolas Herman
Affiliation:
Université de Toulouse, INP, ENVT, 23 chemin des Capelles, BP 87614, F-31076 Toulouse Cedex 3, France
Eric Cahuzac
Affiliation:
Observatoire des programmes communautaires de développement rural, US 0685, INRA Toulouse, chemin de Borde-Rouge, F-31326 Auzeville, France
Pierre Sans
Affiliation:
Université de Toulouse, INP, ENVT, 23 chemin des Capelles, BP 87614, F-31076 Toulouse Cedex 3, France
Gilles Allaire
Affiliation:
Observatoire des programmes communautaires de développement rural, US 0685, INRA Toulouse, chemin de Borde-Rouge, F-31326 Auzeville, France
*
*For correspondence; e-mail: d.raboisson@envt.fr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mastitis is a multifactorial disease and the most costly dairy production issue. In spite of extensive literature on udder-health risk factors, effects of metabolic diseases, farmers’ competencies and livestock farming system on somatic cells count (SCC) are sparsely described. Herd-level or territorial-level factors affecting monthly composite milk weighted mean cow SCC (CMSCC) were analysed with a linear mixed effect model. The average CMSCC was 266000 cells/ml. Half of the herds had CMSCC >300000 cells/ml for 2–6 months a year, and 15% of herds for more than 7 months a year. CMSCC was positively associated with the number of cows, having a beef or fattening herd in addition to the dairy herd, the monthly average days in milk, the yearly age at first calving, the yearly proportion of purchased cows and the yearly culling rate. Moreover, a positive association is reported between CMSCC and the monthly proportion of cows probably with subacute ruminal acidosis (fat percentage minus protein percentage ⩽0·30%, for Holstein) and negative energy balance (protein to fat ratio ⩽0·66, for Holstein), the yearly average calving interval, having at least one dead cow and the mean monthly temperature. The association was negative for a predominant breed other than Holstein, the monthly milk production, the yearly dry-off period length, the monthly first calving cow proportion, having an autumn calving peak, being a Good Breeding Practices member, the monthly number of days with rain, the altitude and the territorial cattle density. CMSCC varied widely among the 11 dairy production areas. In conclusion, this study showed the average CMSCC for the French dairy cows, compared with international results. Moreover, it quantified the contribution of several factors to CMSCC, in particular metabolic diseases and the farm environment.

Keywords

Composite weighted SCCherd-level factorsterritorial-level factors
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 79 , Issue 3 , August 2012 , pp. 324 - 332
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allore, HG, Oltenacu, PA & Erb, HN 1997 Effects of season, herd size, and geographic region on the composition and quality of milk in the northeast. Journal of Dairy Science 80 3040–3049 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barkema, HW, Schukken, YH, Lam, TJ, Beiboer, ML, Benedictus, G & Brand, A 1998 Management practices associated with low, medium, and high somatic cell counts in bulk milk. Journal of Dairy Science 81 1917–1927 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barkema, HW, Van der Ploeg, JD, Schukken, YH, Lam, TJ, Benedictus, G & Brand, A 1999 Management style and its association with bulk milk somatic cell count and incidence rate of clinical mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 82 1655–1663 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnouin, J, Fayet, JC, Jay, M, Brochart, M & Faye, B 1986 Enquete eco-pathologique continue: facteurs de risque des mammites de la vache laitiere II. Analyses complementaires sur donnees individuelles et d'elevage. Canadian Veterinary Journal 27 173–184 Google Scholar
Berry, DP, O'Brien, B, O'Callaghan, EJ, Sullivan, KO & Meaney, WJ 2006 Temporal trends in bulk tank somatic cell count and total bacterial count in Irish dairy herds during the past decade. Journal of Dairy Science 89 4083–4093 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chassagne, M, Barnouin, J & Le Guenic, M 2005 Expert assessment study of milking and hygiene practices characterizing very low somatic cell score herds in France. Journal of Dairy Science 88 1909–1916 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Vliegher, S, Laevens, H, Barkema, HW, Dohoo, IR, Stryhn, H, Opsomer, G & de Kruif, A 2004 Management practices and heifer characteristics associated with early lactation somatic cell count of Belgian dairy heifers. Journal of Dairy Science 87 937–947 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Vries, MJ & Veerkamp, RF 2000 Energy balance of dairy cattle in relation to milk production variables and fertility. Journal of Dairy Science 83 62–69 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dockes, A, Frappat, B & Godefroy, C 2006 The Charter of Good Practices in Cattle Farming, a way to develop traceability on farms. Elements for an evaluation. pp. 184–186 in Renc. Rech. Ruminants. I Elevage Paris.Google Scholar
Duffield, TF, Kelton, DF, Leslie, KE, Lissemore, KD & Lumsden, JH 1997 Use of test day milk fat and milk protein to detect subclinical ketosis in dairy cattle in Ontario. Canadian Veterinary Journal 38 713–718 Google ScholarPubMed
Elmoslemany, AM, Keefe, GP, Dohoo, IR, Wichtel, JJ, Stryhn, H & Dingwell, RT 2010 The association between bulk tank milk analysis for raw milk quality and on-farm management practices. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 95 32–40 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Emanuelson, U & Funke, H 1991 Effect of milk yield on relationship between bulk milk somatic cell count and prevalence of mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 74 2479–2483 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Enjalbert, F, Videau, Y, Nicot, MC & Troegeler-Meynadier, A 2008 Effects of induced subacute ruminal acidosis on milk fat content and milk fatty acid profile. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition (Berlin) 92 284–291 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fenlon, DR, Logue, DN, Gunn, J & Wilson, J 1995 A study of mastitis bacteria and herd management practices to identify their relationship to high somatic cell counts in bulk tank milk. British Veterinary Journal 151 17–25 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, MJ, Bradley, AJ, Medley, GF & Browne, WJ 2008 Cow, farm, and herd management factors in the dry period associated with raised somatic cell counts in early lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 91 1403–1415 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heuer, C, Van Straalen, WM, Schukken, YH, Dirkzwager, A & Noordhuizen, TM 2001 Prediction of energy balance in high yielding dairy cows with test-day information. Journal of Dairy Science 84 471–481 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jansen, J, van den Borne, BH, Renes, RJ, van Schaik, G, Lam, TJ & Leeuwis, C 2009 Explaining mastitis incidence in Dutch dairy farming: the influence of farmers’ attitudes and behaviour. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 92 210–223 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khaitsa, ML, Wittum, TE, Smith, KL, Henderson, JL & Hoblet, KH 2000 Herd characteristics and management practices associated with bulk-tank somatic cell counts in herds in official Dairy Herd Improvement Association programs in Ohio. American Journal of Veterinary Research 61 1092–1098 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kleen, JL, Hooijer, GA, Rehage, J & Noordhuizen, JP 2003 Subacute ruminal acidosis (SARA): a review. Journal of Veterinary Medicine A: Physiology, Pathology, Clinical Medicine 50 406–414 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lacetera, N, Scalia, D, Franci, O, Bernabucci, U, Ronchi, B & Nardone, A 2004 Short communication: effects of nonesterified fatty acids on lymphocyte function in dairy heifers. Journal of Dairy Science 87 1012–1014 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lievaart, J, Barkema, HW, Hogeveen, H & Kremer, W 2009 Reliability of the bulk milk somatic cell count as an indication of average herd somatic cell count. Journal of Dairy Research 76 490–496 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lievaart, JJ, Kremer, WD & Barkema, HW 2007 Short communication: Comparison of bulk milk, yield-corrected, and average somatic cell counts as parameters to summarize the subclinical mastitis situation in a dairy herd. Journal of Dairy Science 90 4145–4148 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukas, JM, Hawkins, DM, Kinsel, ML & Reneau, JK 2005 Bulk tank somatic cell counts analyzed by statistical process control tools to identify and monitor subclinical mastitis incidence. Journal of Dairy Science 88 3944–3952 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Madouasse, A, Huxley, JN, Browne, WJ, Bradley, AJ, Dryden, IL & Green, MJ 2010a Use of individual cow milk recording data at the start of lactation to predict the calving to conception interval. Journal of Dairy Science 93 4677–4690 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Madouasse, A, Huxley, JN, Browne, WJ, Bradley, AJ & Green, MJ 2010b Somatic cell count dynamics in a large sample of dairy herds in England and Wales. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 96 56–64 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDougall, S 2003 Management factors associated with the incidence of clinical mastitis over the non-lactation period and bulk tank somatic cell count during the subsequent lactation. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 51 63–72 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norman, HD, Miller, RH, Wright, JR & Wiggans, GR 2000 Herd and state means for somatic cell count from dairy herd improvement. Journal of Dairy Science 83 2782–2788 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nyman, AK, Emanuelson, U, Gustafsson, AH & Persson Waller, K 2009 Management practices associated with udder health of first-parity dairy cows in early lactation. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 88 138–149 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nyman, AK, Emanuelson, U, Holtenius, K, Ingvartsen, KL, Larsen, T & Waller, KP 2008 Metabolites and immune variables associated with somatic cell counts of primiparous dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 91 2996–3009 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oetzel, GR 2004 Monitoring and testing dairy herds for metabolic disease. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice 20 651–674 Google ScholarPubMed
Oleggini, GH, Ely, LO & Smith, JW 2001 Effect of region and herd size on dairy herd performance parameters. Journal of Dairy Science 84 1044–1050 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ploeg, JD van der & Renting, H 2002 Environmental co-operatives reconnect farming, ecology and society. In Ancient Roots, New Shoots. Endogenous Development in Practice (Eds Haverkort, B, van't Hooft, K & Hiemstra, W.) Leusden: Compas, 2002. ISBN 1 84277 334 8/1 84277 335, pp. 222–227 Google Scholar
Raboisson, D, Cahuzac, E, Sans, P & Allaire, G 2011 Herd-level and contextual factors influencing dairy cow mortality in France in 2005 and 2006. Journal of Dairy Science 94 1790–1803 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raboisson, D & Schelcher, F 2008 Metabolic diseases diagnosis: interests and limits of bood metabolites and milk composition. In Proceedings of the European Buiatrics Meeting, pp. 81–90 Google Scholar
Renting, H, Rossing, WAH, Groot, JCJ, Ploeg, vdJD, Laurent, C, Perraud, D, Stobbelaar, DJ & Ittersum, vMK 2009 Exploring multifunctional agriculture. A review of conceptual approaches and prospects for an integrative transitional framework. Journal of Environmental Management 90(Suppl. 2) S112–S123 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrigues, AC, Caraviello, DZ & Ruegg, PL 2005 Management of Wisconsin dairy herds enrolled in milk quality teams. Journal of Dairy Science 88 2660–2671 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodrigues, AC & Ruegg, PL 2005 Actions and outcomes of Wisconsin dairy farms completing milk quality teams. Journal of Dairy Science 88 2672–2680 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rougoor, CW, Hanekamp, WJ, Dijkhuizen, AA, Nielen, M & Wilmink, JB 1999 Relationships between dairy cow mastitis and fertility management and farm performance. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 39 247–264 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rouquette, JL & Pflimlin, A 1995 Major Livestock production regions : a zoning proposal for France. In Symposium International sur la Nutrition des herbovires. Clermont-Ferrand, France: Inra Google Scholar
Sargeant, JM, Schukken, YH & Leslie, KE 1998 Ontario bulk milk somatic cell count reduction program: progress and outlook. Journal of Dairy Science 81 1545–1554 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sarzeaud, P, Bécherel, F & Perrot, C 2008 A classification of European beef farming systems. In EU beef farming systems and CAP regulations, Vol. 9, pp. 23–31 (Eds. Sarzeaud, P, Dimitriadou, A & Zjalic, M). EAAP Technical series, Paris CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scalia, D, Lacetera, N, Bernabucci, U, Demeyere, K, Duchateau, L & Burvenich, C 2006 In vitro effects of nonesterified fatty acids on bovine neutrophils oxidative burst and viability. Journal of Dairy Science 89 147–154 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schukken, YH, Leslie, KE, Weersink, AJ & Martin, SW 1992 Ontario bulk milk somatic cell count reduction program. 2. Dynamics of bulk milk somatic cell counts. Journal of Dairy Science 75 3359–3366 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skrzypek, R, Wojtowski, J & Fahr, RD 2004 Factors affecting somatic cell count in cow bulk tank milk – a case study from Poland. Journal of Veterinary Medicine A: Physiology, Pathology, Clinical Medicine 51 127–131 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
UCLA 2012 Introduction to R. UCLA: Academic Technology Services, Statistical Consulting Group. http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/mult_pkg/faq/general/log_transformed_regression.htm (accessed February 20, 2012)Google Scholar
Valde, JP, Osteras, O & Simensen, E 2005 Description of herd level criteria for good and poor udder health in Norwegian dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 88 86–92 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valeeva, NI, Lam, TJ & Hogeveen, H 2007 Motivation of dairy farmers to improve mastitis management. Journal of Dairy Science 90 4466–4477 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wenz, JR, Jensen, SM, Lombard, JE, Wagner, BA & Dinsmore, RP 2007 Herd management practices and their association with bulk tank somatic cell count on United States dairy operations. Journal of Dairy Science 90 3652–3659 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed