Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T09:24:04.118Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Birthing a Nation: The Effect of Fertility Control Access on the Nineteenth-Century Demographic Transition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2014

Joanna N. Lahey
Joanna N. Lahey*
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Texas A&M University and NBER, Bush School, TAMU Mailstop 4220, College Station, TX 77843. E-mail: jlahey@nber.org.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

During the nineteenth century, the U.S. birthrate fell by half. While previous economic literature has emphasized demand-side explanations for this decline, many of these arguments are confounded by changes in the supply of technologies to control fertility. I exploit the introduction of state laws governing American women's access to abortion to measure the effect of changes in the supply of fertility technologies on the number of children born. I estimate an increase in the birthrate of 4 to 15 percent when abortion is restricted. I also explore the legal characteristics and political economy of these laws.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 74 , Issue 2 , June 2014 , pp. 482 - 508
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Thanks to Elizabeth Ananat, Martha Bailey, Dora L. Costa, Claudia Goldin, J. David Hacker, Michael Haines, Ann McCants, Bob Margo, and Karen Norberg for helpful discussions, Michael Haines for assistance with census tables, Bob Margo for railroad data, Joe Ferrie and Bob Fogel for death certificate data, Mindy Marks for licensing data, and state law librarians in many states for assistance with historical abortion laws. Thanks also to seminar participants at APPAM, the University of California at Riverside, the University of Kansas, the NBER Development of the American Economy, Northwestern University, Pomona College, and SSHA. Thanks also to the anonymous referees whose excellent feedback greatly improved the article. Finally, thanks also to Jillian Boles, Alejandro Bras, Erin Harrison, Rebecca Willis, and Yi Ding Yu for excellent research assistance, to M. Rose Barlow and Mary Cozad for comments, and to Ryan S. Ananat for the title. The author thanks the National Institute on Aging NBER Grant # T32-AG00186 for funding and support.

References

REFERENCES

Akerlof, George A., Yellen, Janet L., and Katz, Michael L.. “An Analysis of Out-of-Wedlock Childbearing in the United States.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 111, no. 2 (1996): 277–317.Google Scholar
Ananat, Elizabeth Oltmans, and Hungerman, Daniel M.. “The Power of the Pill for the Next Generation: Oral Contraception's Effects on Fertility, Abortion, and Maternal and Child Characteristics.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 94, no. 1 (2012): 37–51.Google Scholar
Angrist, Josh, and Evans, William N.. “Schooling and Labor-Market Consequences of the 1970 State Abortion Reforms.” In Research in Labor Economics, edited by Polachek, S. W and Robst, J, 75–113. Greenwich: JAI Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Bailey, Martha. “More Power to the Pill: The Impact of Contraceptive Freedom on Women's Life Cycle Labor Supply.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 121, no. 1 (2006): 289–320.Google Scholar
Bailey, Martha ““Momma's Got the Pill”: How Anthony Comstock and Griswold V. Connecticut Shaped U.S. Childbearing.” American Economic Review 100, no. 1 (2010): 98–129.Google Scholar
Bailey, Martha “Reexamining the Impact of Family Planning Programs on U.S. Fertility: Evidence from the War on Poverty and the Early Years of Title X.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 4, no. 2 (2012): 62–97.Google Scholar
Brodie, Janet F. Contraception and Abortion in Nineteenth-Century America. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Carter, Susan B., Gartner, Scott S., Haines, Michael, Olmstead, Alan L., Sutch, Richard, and Wright, Gavin. The Historical Statistics of the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Carter, Susan B., Ransom, Roger L., and Sutch, Richard. “Family Matters: The Life-Cycle Transition and the Antebellum American Fertility Decline.” In History Matters: Essays on Economic Growth, Technology, and Demographic Change edited by Guinnane, T, Sundstrom, W, and Whatley, W, 271–327. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press 2004.Google Scholar
Craig, Lee. To Sow One Acre More: Childbearing and Farm Productivity in the Antebellum North. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
David, Paul A., and Sanderson, Warren C.. “Rudimentary Contraceptive Methods and the American Transition to Marital Fertility Control, 1855–1915.” In Long-Term Factors in American Economic Growth, edited by. Engerman, S. L and Gallman, R. E, 307–90. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Degler, Carl N. At Odds: Women and the Family in America from the Revolution to the Present. New York: Oxford University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Dellapena, Joseph W. Dispelling the Myths of Abortion History. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Dennett, Mary Ware. Birth Control Laws, Shall We Keep Them, Change Them, or Abolish Them? New York: F. H. Hitchcock, 1926.Google Scholar
Donohue, John J., and Levitt, Steven D.. “The Impact of Legalized Abortion on Crime.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 116, no. 2 (2001): 379–420.Google Scholar
Easterlin, Richard A. “Does Human Fertility Adjust to the Environment?” The American Economic Review 61, no. 2 (1971): 399–407.Google Scholar
Easterlin, Richard A. “Factors in the Decline of Farm Family Fertility in the United States: Some Preliminary Research Results.” The Journal of American History 63, no. 3 (1976a): 600–14.Google Scholar
Easterlin, Richard A. “Population Change and Farm Settlement in the Northern United States.” The Journal of Economic History 36, no. 1 (1976b): 45–75.Google Scholar
Easterlin, Richard A., Alter, George, and Condran, Gretchen. “Farms and Farm Families in Old and New Areas: The Northern States in 1860.” In Family and Population in Nineteenth-Century America, edited by Hareven, T. K and Vinovskis, M, 22–84. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Elderton, Ethel M. “Report on the English Birth Rate, Pt 1, England North of the Humber.” Eugenics Laboratory Memoirs, 19 and 20. 1914.Google Scholar
Ernst, E. “Herbal Medicinal Products During Pregnancy: Are They Safe?” BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 109 (2002): 227–35.Google Scholar
Eskridge, William N. Gaylaw: Challenging the Apartheid of the Closet. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Forster, Colin, and Tucker, Graham S. L.. Economic Opportunity and White American Fertility Ratios, 1800–1860. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Goldin, Claudia, and Katz, Lawrence F.. “The Power of the Pill: Oral Contraceptives and Women's Career and Marriage Decisions.” Journal of Political Economy 110, no. 4 (2002): 730–70.Google Scholar
Gordon, Linda. Woman's Body, Woman's Right: A Social History of Birth Control in America. New York: Penguin Books, 1976.Google Scholar
Gordon, Linda The Moral Property of Women: A History of Birth Control Politics in America. Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Gruber, Jonathan, Levine, Phillip B., and Staiger, Douglas. “Abortion Legalization and Child Living Circumstances: Who Is the ‘Marginal Child?’” Quarterly Journal of Economics 114, no. 1 (1999): 263–92.Google Scholar
Guinnane, Timothy W. “The Historical Fertility Transition: A Guide for Economists.” Journal of Economic Literature 49, no. 3 (2011): 589–614.Google Scholar
Haines, Michael R. “Comment on New Results on the Decline in Household Fertility in the United States from 1750 to 1900.” In Long-Term Factors in American Economic Growth, edited by Engerman, S. L and Gallman, R. E, 429–37. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Haines, Michael R. “Economic History and Historical Demography: Past, Present, and Future.” In The Future of Economic History,edited by Field, A. J, 185–253. Boston: Kluwer, 1987.Google Scholar
Haines, Michael R., and Guest, Avery M.. “Fertility in New York State in the Pre-Civil War Era.” Demography 45, no. 2 (2008): 345–61.Google Scholar
Haines, Michael R., and David Hacker, J.. “The Puzzle of the Antebellum Fertility Decline in the United States: New Evidence and Reconsideration.” NBER Working Paper No. 12571, October 2006.Google Scholar
Haines, Michael R., and David Hacker, J. “Spatial Aspects of the American Fertility Transition in the Nineteenth Century.” In Navigating Time and Space in Population Studies, edited by Gutmann, M. P et al. , 37–63. International Studies in Population 9, Spring Science and Business Media B.V., 2011.Google Scholar
King, Charles R. “Abortion in Nineteenth-Century America: A Conflict Between Women and Their Physicians.” Women's Health Issues 2, no. 1 (1992): 32–39.Google Scholar
Lader, Lawrence. Abortion. New York: Bobbs-Merril Company, 1966.Google Scholar
Lahey, Joanna N. “The Effect of Anti-Abortion Legislation on Nineteenth Century Fertility.” Demography, (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Law, Marc, and Marks, Mindy. “Effects of Occupational Licensing Laws on Minorities: Evidence from the Progressive Era.” The Journal of Law and Economics 52, no. 2 (2009): 351–66.Google Scholar
Levine, Phillip. Sex and Consequences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Levine, Phillip, Staiger, Douglas, Kane, Thomas, et al. . “Roe v. Wade and American Fertility.” American Journal of Public Health 89, no. 1 (1999): 199–203.Google Scholar
Loudon, Irvine. Death in Childbirth: An International Study of Maternal Care and Maternal Mortality, 1800–1950. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Madari, Hamta, and Jacobs, Robert S.. “An Analysis of Cytotoxic Botanical Formulations Used in the Traditional Medicine of Ancient Persia as Abortifacients.” Journal of Natural Products 67 (2004): 1204–10.Google Scholar
McCants, Anne. Personal communication, November 2, 2012.Google Scholar
McFarlane, Deborah R., and Meier, Kenneth J.. The Politics of Fertility Control. New York: Chatham House Publishers, 2001.Google Scholar
McLaren, Angus. A History of Contraception. Cambridge, MA: Basic Blackwell, 1990.Google Scholar
Mohr, James C. Abortion in America: The Origins and Evolution of National Policy, 1800–1900. New York: Oxford University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Myers, Caitlin K. “Power of the Pill or Power of Abortion: Reexamining the Effects of Young Women's Access to Reproductive Control.” IZA Working Paper No. 6661, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olasky, Marvin N. Abortion Rites: A Social History of Abortion in America. Wheaton, IL: Crossways Books, 1992.Google Scholar
Polsky, S. “Legal Aspects of Abortion.” Seminars in Psychiatry 2 (1970): 246–57.Google Scholar
Pop?Eleches, Cristian. “The Impact of an Abortion Ban on Socioeconomic Outcomes of Children: Evidence from Romania.” Journal of Political Economy 114, no. 4 (2006): 744–73.Google Scholar
Reagan, Leslie J. “About to Meet Her Maker: Women, Doctors, Dying Declarations, and the State's Investigation of Abortion, Chicago, 1867–1940.” The Journal of American History 78 (1991): 1240–64.Google Scholar
Reed, James. From Private Vice to Public Virtue: The Birth Control Movement and American Society Since 1830. New York: Basic Books, 1978.Google Scholar
Quay, Eugene. “Justifiable Abortion: Medical and Legal Foundations.” The Georgetown Law Journal 49, no. 3 (1961): 395–538.Google Scholar
Sanderson, Warren C. “Quantitative Aspects of Marriage Fertility and Family Limitation in Nineteenth-Century America: Another Application of the Coale Specifications.” Demography 16 (1979): 339–58.Google Scholar
Smith, Daniel Scott. “Family Limitation, Sexual Control, and Domestic Feminism in Victorian America.” Feminist Studies 1, no. 3/4 (1973): 40–57.Google Scholar
Smith-Rosenberg, Carroll. Disorderly Conduct: Visions of Gender in Victorian America. New York: Oxford University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Steckel, Richard H. “The Fertility Transition in the United States: Tests of Alternative Hypotheses.” In Strategic Factors in Nineteenth-Century American Economic History: A Volume to Honor Robert W. Fogel, edited by Goldin, C and Rockoff, H, 351–97. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Storer, Horatio R. Criminal Abortion in America. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott & Co., 1860.Google Scholar
Storer, Horatio R. Why Not?: A Book for Every Woman. Lee and Shepard, 1868.Google Scholar
Storer, Horatio R., and Heard, Franklin F.. Criminal Abortion: Its Nature, Its Evidence, and Its Law. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1868.Google Scholar
Sundstrom, William A., and David, Paul A.. “Old-Age Security Motives, Labor Markets, and Farm-Family Fertility in Antebellum America.” Explorations in Economic History 25, no. 2 (1988): 164–97.Google Scholar
Thomasson, Melissa A., and Treber, Jaret. “From Home to Hospital: The Evolution of Childbirth in the United States, 1928–1940.” Explorations in Economic History 45, no. 1 (2008): 76–99.Google Scholar
Tolnay, Stewart E., Graham, S. N., and Guest, Avery M.. “Own Child Estimates of U.S. White Fertility, 1886–1899.” Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History 15, no. 3 (1982) 127–38.Google Scholar
Tribe, Laurence H. Abortion: The Clash of Absolutes. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1990.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of Education. Report of the Commissioner of Education Made to the Secretary of Education. Vol. 2. 1898.Google Scholar
van de Walle, Etienne, and de Luca, Virginie. “Birth Prevention in the American and French Fertility Transitions: Contrasts in Knowledge and Practice.” Population and Development Review 32, no. 3 (2006): 529–55.Google Scholar
Washington, Ebonya Lia. “Female Socialization: How Daughters Affect Their Legislator Fathers’ Voting on Women's Issues.” American Economic Review 98, no. 1 (2008): 311–32.Google Scholar
Yasuba, Yasukichi. Birth Rates of the White Population in the United States, 1800–1860: An Economic Study. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Yetter, Noelle. Personal communication, April 13, 2012.Google Scholar