Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T10:27:58.693Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From the Counting House to the Modern Office: Explaining Anglo-American Productivity Differences in Services, 1870–1990

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2003

Stephen Broadberry  and
Sayantan Ghosal
Stephen Broadberry
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom. E-mail: S.N.Broadberry@warwick.ac.uk.
Sayantan Ghosal
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom. E-mail: S.Ghosal@warwick.ac.uk.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The United States overtook Britain in comparative aggregate productivity levels primarily as a result of trends in services rather than trends in industry. This occurred during the transition from customized, low-volume, high-margin business organized on the basis of networks to standardized, high-volume, low-margin business with hierarchical management from the 1870s. This transformation from the counting house to the modern office was dependent on technologies that improved communications and information processing. The technologies were slower to diffuse in Britain as a result of lower levels of education and stronger labor-force resistance to intensification.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 62 , Issue 4 , December 2002 , pp. 967 - 998
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Gregory. Victorian Clerks. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Arthur, W. Brian. Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Atack, Jeremy, and Passell, Peter. A New Economic View of American History, Second Edition. New York: Norton, 1994.Google Scholar
Baily, Martin N., and Solow, Robert M.. “International Productivity Comparisons Built from the Firm Level.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 15, no. 3 (2001): 151–72.Google Scholar
Bain, George S. The Growth of White-Collar Unionism. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Bain, George S., and Price, Robert. Profiles of Union Growth: A Comparative Statistical Portrait of Eight Countries. Oxford: Blackwell, 1980.Google Scholar
Barro, Robert J., and Sala-i-Martin, Xavier. Economic Growth. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1995.Google Scholar
Bernard, Andrew B., and Jones, Charles I.. “Comparing Apples to Oranges: Productivity Convergence and Measurement Across Industries and Countries.” American Economic Review 86, no. 5 (1996): 1216–38.Google Scholar
Booth, Alan. The British Economy in the Twentieth Century. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2001.Google Scholar
Boyce, Gordon. Information, Mediation and Institutional Development: The Rise of Large- Scale Enterprise in British Shipping, 1870–1919. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Braverman, Harry. Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Broadberry, Stephen N. The Productivity Race: British Manufacturing in International Perspective, 1850–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Broadberry, Stephen N.. “Forging Ahead, Falling Behind and Catching-Up: A Sectoral Analysis of Anglo-American Productivity Differences, 1870–1990.” Research in Economic History 17 (1997): 1–37.Google Scholar
Broadberry, Stephen N.. “How did the United States and Germany Overtake Britain? A Sectoral Analysis of Comparative Productivity Levels, 1870–1990.” This JOURNAL 58, no. 2 (1998): 375–407.Google Scholar
Broadberry, Stephen N., and Crafts, Nicholas F. R.. “The Implications of British Macroeconomic Policy in the 1930s for Long Run Growth Performance.” Rivista di Storia Economica 7, no. 1 (1990): 1–19.Google Scholar
Broadberry, Stephen N., and R, Nicholas F.. “Britain's Productivity Gap in the 1930s: Some Neglected Factors.” this JOURNAL 52, no. 3 (1992): 531–58.Google Scholar
Broadberry, Stephen N., and Ghosal, Sayantan. “Networks, Hierarchies and Economic Performance.” Unpublished Manuscript.Google Scholar
Cain, Peter J. “Private Enterprise or Public Utility? Output, Pricing and Investment on English and Welsh Railways, 1870–1914.” Journal of Transport History 1, no. 1 (1980): 9–28.Google Scholar
Cain, Peter J., and Hopkins, Antony G.. British Imperialism: Innovation and Expansionism 1668–1914. London: Longman, 1993.Google Scholar
Calomiris, Charles W. “The Costs of Rejecting Universal Banking: American Finance in the German Mirror, 1870–1914.” In Coordination and Information: Historical Perspectives on the Organization of Enterprise, edited by Lamoreaux, Naomi R. and Raff, Daniel M.G., 257–315. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Campbell-Kelly, Martin. “Large-Scale Data Processing in the Prudential, 1850–1930.” Accounting, Business and Financial History 2, no. 2 (1992): 117–39.Google Scholar
Campbell-Kelly, Martin. “The Railway Clearing House and Victorian Data Processing.” In Information and Acumen: The Understanding and Use of Knowledge in Modern Business, edited by Bud-Frierman, Lisa, 51–74. London: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar
Campbell-Kelly, Martin. “Information Technology and Organizational Change in the British Census, 1801– 1911.” Information Systems Research 7, no. 1 (1996): 22–36.Google Scholar
Campbell-Kelly, Martin. “Data Processing and Technological Change: The Post Office Savings Bank, 1861–1930.” Technology and Culture 39, no. 1 (1998): 1–32.Google Scholar
Carson, Daniel. “Changes in the Industrial Composition of Manpower since the Civil War.” NBER Studies in Income and Wealth 11 (1949): 46–134.Google Scholar
, Jr. The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
, Jr.. “The United States: Seedbed of Managerial Capitalism.” In Managerial Hierarchies: Comparative Perspectives on the Rise of the Modern Industrial Enterprise, edited by , Jr. and Daems, Herman, 9–40. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
, Jr. Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Channon, Geoffrey. Railways in Britain and the United States, 1830–1940: Studies in Economic and Business History. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2001.Google Scholar
Cortada, James W. Before the Computer: IBM, NCR, Burroughs and Remington Rand and the Industry they Created, 1865–1956. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
David, Paul A. “Clio and the Economics of QWERTY.” American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 75, no. 2 (1985): 332–37.Google Scholar
David, Paul A., and Wright, Gavin. “Early Twentieth Century Productivity Growth Dynamics: An Inquiry into the Economic History of ‘Our Ignorance’.” Unpublished Manuscript.Google Scholar
Deakin, Brian M. Shipping Conferences: A Study of their Origins, Development and Economic Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Dintenfass, Michael. The Decline of Industrial Britain, 1870–1990. London: Routledge, 1982. Google Scholar
Douglas, Paul H. Real Wages in the United States, 1890–1926. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1930. Google Scholar
Drummond, Ian M. Imperial Economic Policy, 1917–1939: Studies in Expansion and Protection. London: Allen & Unwin, 1974.Google Scholar
Edwards, Alba M. Comparative Occupation Statistics for the United States, 1870–1940. Washington, DC: GPO, 1943.Google Scholar
Elbaum, Bernard, and Lazonick, William, eds. The Decline of the British Economy. Oxford: Clarendon, 1986.Google Scholar
Engerman, Stanley, and Gallman, Robert, eds. The Cambridge Economic History of the United States, Volume III: The Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Feinstein, Charles H. National Income, Expenditure and Output of the United Kingdom, 1855–1965. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Field, Alexander J. “The Relative Productivity of American Distribution, 1869–1992.” Research in Economic History, 16 (1996): 1–37.Google Scholar
Fishlow, Albert. “Productivity and Technological Change in the Railroad Sector, 1840–1910.” In Output, Employment and Productivity in the United States After 1800, edited by Brady, Dorothy S., 583–646. NBER Studies in Income and Wealth, vol. 30. New York: Columbia University Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Floud, Roderick, and McCloskey, D., eds. The Economic History of Britain Since 1700, Second Edition, Volumes 1–3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Foreman-Peck, James. “Seed-Corn or Chaff? New Firm Formation and the Performance of the Interwar Economy.” Economic History Review 38, no. 3 (1985): 402–22.Google Scholar
Foreman-Peck, James, and Millward, Robert. Public and Private Ownership of British Industry, 1820–1990. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Gemmell, Norman, and Wardley, Peter. “The Contribution of Services to British Economic Growth, 1856–1913.” Explorations in Economic History 27, no. 3 (1990): 299–321.Google Scholar
Goldin, Claudia. “America's Graduation from High School: The Evolution and Spread of Secondary Schooling in the Twentieth Century.” This JOURNAL 58, no. 4 (1998): 345–74.Google Scholar
oldin, Claudia. “The Human-Capital Century and American Leadership: Virtues of the Past.” This JOURNAL 61, no. 2 (2001): 263–92.Google Scholar
Goldin, Claudia, and Lawrence, Katz. “The Origins of Technology-Skill Complementarity.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 113, no. 3 (1998): 693–732.Google Scholar
Greif, Avner. “Cultural Beliefs and the Organization of Society: A Historical and Theoretical Reflection on Collectivist and Individualist Societies.” Journal of Political Economy 102, no. 5 (1994): 912–50.Google Scholar
Griffiths, Brian. “The Development of Restrictive Practices in the UK Monetary System.” Manchester School 41, no. 1 (1973): 3–18.Google Scholar
Griliches, Zvi, ed. Output Measurement in the Service Sectors. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Guerriero Wilson, Robbie. Disillusionment or New Opportunities? The Changing Nature of Work in Offices, Glasgow 1880–1914. Aldershot: Ashgate, 1998.Google Scholar
Habakkuk, H. John. American and British Technology in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Hall, Margaret, Knapp, John, and Winsten, Christopher. Distribution in Great Britain and North America: A Study in Structure and Productivity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Halsey, Albert H., ed. Trends in British Society Since 1900: A Guide to the Changing Social Structure of Britain, Second Edition. London: Macmillan, 1988.Google Scholar
Hannah, Leslie. “Managerial Innovation and the Rise of the Large-Scale Company in Interwar Britain.” Economic History Review 27, no. 2 (1974): 252–70.Google Scholar
Hannah, Leslie. “The Economic Consequences of the State Ownership of Industry, 1945–1990.” In The Economic History of Britain Since 1700, Second Edition, Volume 3: 1939– 1992, edited by Floud, Roderick and McCloskey, D., 168–94. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Hawke, Gary R. Railways and Economic Growth in England and Wales, 1840–1870. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Jeremy, David J. “The Hundred Largest Employers in the UK: 1907, 1935, 1955.” Business History 33, no. 1 (1991): 93–111.Google Scholar
Jeremy, David J., and Farnie, Douglas A. “The Ranking of Firms, the Counting of Employees, and the Classification of Data: A Cautionary Note.” Business History 43, no. 3 (2001): 105–18.Google Scholar
Jones, Geoffrey. British Multinational Banking, 1830–1990. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993. Google Scholar
Jones, Geoffrey. Merchants to Multinationals: British Trading Companies in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Kendrick, John W. Productivity Trends in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Kinghorn, Janice R., and Nye, John V. “The Scale of Production in Western Economic Development: A Comparison of Official Industry Statistics in the United States, Britain, France, and Germany, 1905–1913.” This JOURNAL 56, no. 1 (1996): 90–112.Google Scholar
Lamoreaux, Naomi. Insider Lending: Banks, Personal Connections, and Economic Development in Industrial New England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Lebergott, Stanley. “Labor Force and Employment, 1800–1960.” In Output, Employment and Productivity in the United States after 1800, edited by Brady, Dorothy S., 117– 204.Google Scholar
NBER Studies in Income and Wealth, vol. 30. New York: Columbia University Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Lee, Clive H. The British Economy Since 1700: A Macroeconomic Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Lee, Clive H.. “The Service Industries.” In The Economic History of Britain Since 1700, Second Edition, Volume 2: 1860–1939, edited by Floud, Roderick and McCloskey, D., 117–44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Lewchuk, Wayne. American Technology and the British Vehicle Industry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Lindert, Peter H. “Democracy, Decentralization, and Mass Schooling Before 1914: Appendices.” Working Paper No.105, Agricultural History Center, University of California, Davis, 2001.Google Scholar
Lockwood, David. The Blackcoated Worker: A Study in Class Consciousness. London: Allen and Unwin, 1958.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Deirdre N. “Bourgeois Virtue and the History of P and S.” This JOURNAL 58, no. 2 (1998): 297–317.Google Scholar
McCloskey, D. N., and Sandberg, Lars G.. “From Damnation to Redemption: Judgments on the Late Victorian Entrepreneur.” Explorations in Economic History 9, no. 1 (1971): 89–108.Google Scholar
McCraw, Thomas K. “Competition and ‘Fair Trade’: History and Theory.” Research in Economic History 16 (1996): 185–239.Google Scholar
McKinsey Global Institute. Service Sector Productivity. Washington, DC: McKinsey Global Institute, 1992.Google Scholar
Maddison, Angus. Dynamic Forces in Capitalist Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991. Google Scholar
Matthews, Robin C.O., Feinstein, Charles H., and Odling-Smee, John C.. British Economic Growth, 1856–1973. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Melman, Seymour. Dynamic Factors in Industrial Productivity. Oxford: Blackwell, 1967.Google Scholar
Milgrom, Paul, and Roberts, John. “The Economics of Modern Manufacturing: Technology, Strategy and Organization.” American Economic Review 80, no. 3 (1990): 511–28.Google Scholar
Mitch, David F. The Rise of Literacy in Victorian England: The Influence of Private Choice and Public Policy. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Brian R. British Historical Statistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
O’Mahony, Mary. Britain's Productivity Performance 1950–1996: An International Perspective. London: National Institute of Economic and Social Research, 1999.Google Scholar
O’Mahony, Mary, Oulton, Nicholas, and Vass, Jennet. “Market Services: Productivity Benchmarks for the UK.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 60, no. 4 (1998): 529–51.Google Scholar
Ohkawa, Kazushi, and Rosovsky, Henry. Japanese Economic Growth: Trend Acceleration in the Twentieth Century. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Perkins, Edwin J. Wall Street to Main Street: Charles Merrill and Middle-Class Investors. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Prais, Sigbert J. Productivity and Industrial Structure: A Statistical Study of Manufacturing Industry in Britain, 1909–70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Pryke, Richard. Public Enterprise in Practice: The British Experience of Nationalization over Two Decades. London: MacGibbon & Kee, 1971.Google Scholar
Ringer, Fritz K. Education and Society in Modern Europe. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1979. Google Scholar
Routh, Guy. Occupation and Pay in Great Britain, 1906–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1965. Google Scholar
Rotella, Elyce J. From Home to Office: U.S. Women at Work, 1870–1930. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI Research Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Rubinstein, William D. Capitalism, Culture and Decline in Britain, 1750–1990. London: Routledge, 1993. Google Scholar
Sabel, Charles F., and Zeitlin, Jonathan, eds. World of Possibilities: Flexibility and Mass Production in Western Industrialization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Smith, Anthony D., Hitchens, David M. W. N., and Davies, Stephen W.. International Industrial Productivity: A Comparison of Britain, America and Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, Joseph and Weiss, Andrew. (1981) “Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information.” American Economic Review 71, no. 3 (1981): 393–410.Google Scholar
Tedlow, Richard S. New and Improved: The Story of Mass Marketing in America. Boston MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Turner, Graham. Business in Britain. London: Eyre and Spottiswoode, 1969.Google Scholar
Tyack, David, ed. Turning Points in American Educational History. Lexington, MA: Xerox, 1967.Google Scholar
U.K. Board of Trade. Census of Production: Final Report. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
U.K. Board of Trade. Report on the Census of Distribution and Other Services. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
U.K. Central Statistical Office. Annual Abstract of Statistics. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
U.K. Central Statistical Office. Economic Trends Annual Supplement. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
U.K. Central Statistical Office. National Income Statistics: Sources and Methods. London: HMSO, 1956.Google Scholar
U.K. Customs and Excise. Annual Statement of the Trade of the United Kingdom. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
U.K. Department of Education and Science, Education Statistics for the United Kingdom, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
U.K. Office of Population Censuses and Surveys. Census of England and Wales. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
U.K. Office of Population Censuses and Surveys. Census of Scotland. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
U.K. Post Office. Telecommunications Statistics, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce. Census of Manufactures, Washington, DC: GPO.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce. Foreign Commerce and Navigation of the United States, Washington, DC: GPO.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce. Historical Statistics of the United States: Colonial Times to 1970, Washington, DC: GPO, 1975.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce. Statistical Abstract of the United States, Washington, DC: GPO.Google Scholar
Wardley, Peter. “The Emergence of Big Business: The Largest Corporate Employers of Labour in the United Kingdom, Germany and the United States c.1907.” Business History 41, no. 4 (1999): 88–116.Google Scholar
Wardley, Peter. “The Commercial Banking Industry and its Part in the Emergence and Consolidation of the Corporate Economy in Britain before 1940.” Journal of Industrial History 3, no. 2 (2000): 71–97.Google Scholar
Wardley, Peter. “On the Ranking of Firms: A Response to Jeremy and Farnie.” Business History 43, no. 3 (2001): 119–34.Google Scholar
White, Eugene N. (2000) “Banking and Finance in the Twentieth Century.” In The Cambridge Economic History of the United States, Volume III: The Twentieth Century, edited by Engerman, Stanley L. and Gallman, Robert E., 743–802. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Wiener, Martin J. English Culture and the Decline of the Industrial Spirit, 1850–1980. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Yamey, Basil S. “The United Kingdom.” In Resale Price Maintenance, edited by Yamey, Basil S., 249–98. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1966.Google Scholar
Yates, Joanna. Control through Communication: The Rise of System in American Management. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, Jonathan. “Between Flexibility and Mass Production: Strategic Ambiguity and Selective Adaptation in the British Engineering Industry, 1830–1914.” In World of Possibilities: Flexibility and Mass Production in Western Industrialization, edited by Sabel, Charles F., and Zeitlin, Jonathan, 241–72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar