Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:43:47.911Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Do Patents Weaken the Localization of Innovations? Evidence from World's Fairs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2011

Petra Moser
Petra Moser*
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305; and NBER. E-mail: pmoser@stanford.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article takes advantage of an exogenous shift towards patenting in chemicals to test whether patents contribute to the geographic diffusion of innovations. Data on U.S. innovations that were exhibited at four world fairs between 1851 and 1915 suggest that innovative activity became less localized after patenting rates increased. These changes cannot be explained by changes in the localization of chemical production or economy-wide changes in the localization of innovations.

Type
ARTICLES
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 71 , Issue 2 , 06 June 2011 , pp. 363 - 382
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, Robert. “Collective Invention.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 4, no. 1 (1983): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annual Report of the United States Commissioner of Patents. Washington, DC: GPO, 1841–1851.Google Scholar
Arora, Ashish, and Rosenberg, Nathan. “Chemicals, A U.S. Success Story.” In Chemicals and Long-Term Economic Growth, edited byArora, Ashish, Landau, Ralph, and Rosenberg, Nathan, 71–102. New York: John Wiley, 1998.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth. “Economic Implications of Learning by Doing.” The Review of Economic Studies 29, no. 3 (1962): 155–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asimov, Isaac. Asimov's Biographical Encyclopedia of Science and Technology: The Lives and Achievements of 1510 Great Scientists from Ancient Times to the Present Chronologically Arranged. London: Pan Macmillan, 1975.Google Scholar
Audretsch, David B., and Feldman, Maryann P.. “R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production.” American Economic Review 86, no. 3 (1996): 630–40.Google Scholar
Bartholomew, John George, Gazetteer of the British Isles, Statistical and Topographical, edited byBartholomew, John and A. and Black, C.. Edinburgh: John Bartholomew, 1887.Google Scholar
Bayer, A. G. Beiträge zur Hundertjährigen Firmengeschichte, 1863–1865. Leverkusen, Germany: A. G. Bayer, 1963.Google Scholar
Belfanti, Carlo M.“Guilds, Patents, and the Circulation of Technical Knowledge: Northern Italy During the Early Modern Age.” Technology and Culture 45, no. 3 (2004): 569–89.Google Scholar
Berichterstattungs-Kommission der Deutschen Zollvereins-Regierungen. Amtlicher Bericht über die Industrie-Austellung aller Völker zu London im Jahre 1851, Vols. 1–3. Berlin, Prussia: Verlag der Deckerschen Geheimen Ober-Hofbuchdruckerei, Vols. 1 and 2, 1852 and Vol. 3, 1853.Google Scholar
Breschi, Stefano, and Lissoni, Francesco. “Knowledge Spillovers and Local Innovation Systems: A Critical Survey.” Industrial and Corporate Change 10 (2001): 975–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunello, Franco. The Art of Dyeing in the History of Mankind. Vicenza: Neri Pozza, 1973.Google Scholar
Butler, J. W.Paper Company. The Story of Papermaking: An Account of Papermaking from Its Earliest Known Record Down to the Present Time. Chicago: Butler Paper Company, 1901.Google Scholar
Chenciner, Robert. Madder Red, A History of Luxury and Trade: Plant Dyes and Pigments in World Commerce and Art. Richmond, UK: Curzon, 2000.Google Scholar
Conley, Timothy G., and Udry, Christopher R.. “Social Networks in Ghana.” Working Paper, Economic Growth Center, Yale University, May 2004.Google Scholar
Cooper, Grace Rogers.The Invention of the Sewing Machine. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution, 1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutton, Harold I.The Patent System and Inventive Activity During the Industrial Revolution, 1750–1852. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Ellison, Glenn, and Glaeser, Edward L.. “Geographic Concentration in U.S. Manufacturing Industries: A Dartboard Approach.” Journal of Political Economy 105, no. 5 (1997): 889–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Stephan R.“Property Rights to Technical Knowledge in Premodern Europe, 1300–1800.” American Economic Review 94, no. 2 (2004): 382–88.Google Scholar
Feldman, Maryann P. “Location and Innovation: The New Economic Geography of Innovation, Spillovers, and Agglomeration.” In Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography, edited byClark, G., Feldman, M., and Gertler, M., 373–94. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Frampton, Kenneth. Modern Architecture, 1851–1945. New York: Rizzoli International Publications, 1983.Google Scholar
Haber, L. F.The Chemical Industry During the Nineteenth Century: A Study of the Economic Aspect of Applied Chemistry in Europe and North America. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1958.Google Scholar
Haynes, William. American Chemical Industry: A History, 1912–1922. New York: Nostrand, 1945.Google Scholar
Jaffe, Adam B.“Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms' Patents, Profits, and Market Value.” American Economic Review 76, no. 5 (1986): 984–1001.Google Scholar
Jaffe, Adam B., Trajtenberg, Manuel, and Henderson, Rebecca. “Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 108, no. 3 (1993): 577–98.Google Scholar
Kekulé, Friedrich August.“Sur la constitution des substances aromatiques.” Bulletin de la Societé Chimique de Paris 3 (1865): 98–110.Google Scholar
Kekulé, Friedrich August.“Untersuchungen über aromatische Verbindungen.” Liebigs Annalen der Chemie 137 (1866): 129–36.Google Scholar
Khan, B. Zorina.The Democratization of Invention: Patents and Copyrights in American Economic Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Kretschmer, Winfried. Geschichte der Weltaustellungen. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag, 1999.Google Scholar
Lamoreaux, Naomi R., and Sokoloff, Kenneth L.. “Inventors, Firms, and the Market for Technology in the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries.” In Learning by Doing in Markets, Firms, and Countries, edited byLamoreaux, Naomi R., Raff, Daniel M. G., and Temin, Peter, 19–57. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Lamoreaux, Naomi R.“The Geography of Invention in the American Glass Industry, 1875–1925.” The Journal of Economic History 60, no. 3 (2000): 700–29.Google Scholar
Leapman, Michael. The World for a Shilling: How the Great Exhibition of 1851 Shaped a Nation. London: Headline Book Publishing, 2001.Google Scholar
Lerner, Josh. “150 Years of Patent Protection.” National Bureau of Economics Research. NBER Working Paper No. 7478, January 2000.Google Scholar
MacLeod, Christine. Inventing the Industrial Revolution: The English Patent System, 1660–1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maher, Patrick. “Prediction, Accommodation, and the Logic of Discovery.” Philosophy of Science Association 1 (1988): 273–85.Google Scholar
Marshall, Alfred. Principles of Economics. London: Macmillan, 1890.Google Scholar
Meyer, David R.Networked Machinists: Forging High-Technology Industries in Antebellum America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mokyr, Joel. The Economics of the Industrial Revolution. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld, 1985.Google Scholar
Mokyr, Joel. The British Industrial Revolution: An Economic Perspective. Boulder, CO: Boulder Westview Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Mokyr, Joel. “Urbanization, Technological Progress, and Economic History.” In Urban Agglomeration and Economic Growth, edited byGiersch, Herbert, 3–37. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mokyr, Joel. The Gifts of Athena: Historical Origins of the Knowledge Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Moser, Petra. “Innovation Without Patent.” Stanford University Working Paper, 2010.Google Scholar
Moser, Petra, and Nicholas, Tom. “Was Electricity a General Purpose Technology?” American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 94, no. 2 (2004): 388–94.Google Scholar
Munsell, Joel. A Chronology of Paper and Papermaking. Albany: J. Munsell, 1870.Google Scholar
Murmann, Johann Peter.Knowledge and Competitive Advantage: The Coevolution of Firms, Technology, and National Institution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Association of Counties, available at the following website, http://www.naco.org/research/data/Pages/CitySearch.aspx.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, William D.“An Economic Theory of Technological Change.” American Economic Review 59, no. 2 (1969): 18–28.Google Scholar
Nuvolari, Alessandro, “Collective Invention During the British Industrial Revolution: The Case of the Cornish Pumping Engine.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 28 (2004): 347–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purbrick, Louise. “Knowledge is Property: Looking at Exhibits and Patents in 1851. Oxford Art Journal 20, no. 2 (1997): 53–60.Google Scholar
Rolt, L. T. C.Victorian Engineering. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books, 1970.Google Scholar
Romer, Paul. “Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth.” Journal of Political Economy 94, no. 5 (1986): 1002–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romer, Paul. “Endogenous Technological Change.” Journal of Political Economy 98, no. 5 (1990): S71–S102.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Nathan. “Technological Change in the Machine Tool Industry, 1840–1910.” The Journal of Economic History 23, no. 4 (1963): 414–43.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Nathan. Exploring the Black Box: Technology, Economics, and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Royal Commission. Official Catalogue of the Great Exhibition of the Work of Industry of All Nations 1851. 3rd edition. London: Spicer Brothers, 1851.Google Scholar
Schmookler, Jacob. Patents, Invention, and Economic Growth: Data and Selected Essays, edited byGriliches, Zvi and Hurvicz, Leonid. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scotchmer, Suzanne. “Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Cumulative Research and the Patent Law.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 5, no. 1 (1991): 29–41.Google Scholar
The Department of Publicity and Promotion, Handy, M.P., Chief, ed. World's Columbian Exposition 1893: Official Catalogue: Chicago: W. B. Conkey Company, 1893.Google Scholar
The Division of Exhibits. Official Catalogue of Exhibitors: Panama-Pacific International Exposition San Francisco, California, 1915. San Francisco: The Wahlgreen Company, 1915.Google Scholar
The Getty Thesaurus of Geographic Names Online, available at the following website, http://www.getty.edu/research/tools/vocabularies/tgn/index.html.Google Scholar
Thomson, Alistair G.The Paper Industry in Scotland, 1590–1861. Edinburgh: Scottish Academy Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Thomson, Ross. Structures of Change in the Mechanical Age: Technological Innovation in the United States, 1790–1865. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trajtenberg, Manuel. “A Penny for Your Quotes: Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations.” RAND Journal of Economics 21, no. 1 (1990): 172–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United States Bureau of the Census. Report on Manufacturing Industries in the United States. Washington, DC: GPO, 1850–1920.Google Scholar
United States Centennial Commission. Official Catalogue, Centennial Catalogue Co. by J. R. Nagle and Co., 1876.Google Scholar
United States Supreme Court reports, Volume 28, By United States. Supreme Court, Lawyers Cooperative Publishing Company, 1901.Google Scholar
Wallace, Anthony F. C.Rockdale: The Growth of an American Village in the Early Industrial Revolution. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2005.Google Scholar