Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T14:23:19.791Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Measure of Legal Independence”: The 1870 Married Women's Property Act and the Portfolio Allocations of British Wives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2005

MARY BETH COMBS
MARY BETH COMBS
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Dealy Hall 523, Fordham University, Bronx, NY 10458. E-mail: mcombs@fordham.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I examine the portfolio allocations of women married in the years surrounding the 1870 Married Women's Property Act. The act, which gave women married after 1870 the right to own and control personal property, serves as a natural experiment to examine the extent to which individuals respond to changes in property law. I link wealth data to census information and find that, as a result of the act, women married after 1870 altered their portfolio allocations by shifting wealth-holding away from real property to personal property. The results indicate that the act greatly impacted the investment decisions of women.

Type
ARTICLES
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 65 , Issue 4 , December 2005 , pp. 1028 - 1057
Copyright
© 2005 The Economic History Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson Michael. 1997 “The Social Implications of Demographic Change.” In The Cambridge Social History of Britain 1750–1950, Volume 2, edited by F. M. L. Thompson, 1– 70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, (1990).
Ando Albert, and Franco Modigliani. 1963: “The Life Cycle Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate Implications and Tests.” American Economic Review 53, no. 1 55– 84.Google Scholar
Baker J. H. 1990. An Introduction to English Legal History, Third Edition. London and Boston: Butterworths,
Basch Norma. 1979: “Invisible Women: The Legal Fiction of Marital Unity in Nineteenth-Century America.” Feminist Studies 5, no. 2 346– 66.Google Scholar
Basch Norma. 1982. In the Eyes of the Law: Women, Marriage, and Property in Nineteenth-Century New York. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press,
Baxter Robert D. 1862. National Income. London: Macmillan,
Bellante Don, and Richard P. Saba. 1986: “Human Capital and Life-Cycle Effects on Risk Aversion.” The Journal of Financial Research 9, no. 1 41– 51.Google Scholar
Bernheim B. Douglas, Andrei Shleifer, and Laurence H. Summers. 1985: “The Strategic Bequest Motive.” Journal of Political Economy 93, no. 6 1045– 76.Google Scholar
Branca Patricia. 1975. Silent Sisterhood: Middle-Class Women in the Victorian Home. London: Croom Helm,
Chow Gregory C. 1960: “Tests of Equality Between Sets of Coefficients in Two Linear Regressions.” Econometrica 28, no. 3 591– 605.Google Scholar
Chused Richard. (1985): “Late Nineteenth Century Married Women's Property Law: Reception of the Early Married omen's Property Acts by Courts and Legislatures” American Journal of Legal History 29, no 2 3– 35.Google Scholar
Chused Richard. 1983: “Married Women's Property Law: 1800–1850.” The Georgetown Law Journal 71, no. 4 1359– 425.Google Scholar
Collinge Michael. 1987: “Probate Valuations and the Death Duty Registers: Some Comments.” Bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research 60, no. 128 240– 45.Google Scholar
Colquhoun Patrick. 1806. A Treatise on Indigence. London: J. Hatchard,
Combs Mary Beth. 2005. “Concealing Him from Creditors.” Working Paper, Fordham University, Bronx, NY,
Combs Mary Beth. “Cui Bono? The 1870 Married Women's Property Act, Bargaining Power, and the Distribution of Resources within Marriage.” Feminist Economics (forthcoming).
Cox Jane. 1988. Affection Defying the Power of Death: Wills, Probate, & Death Duty Records.London: Federation of Family History Societies,
Cox Jane. 1988. Wills, Inventories and Death Duties: A Provisional Guide. London: Public Record Office,
Davidoff Leonore. 1996 “The Family in Britain.” In The Cambridge Social History of Britain, 1750–1950, v. 2 edited by F. M. L. Thompson, 71– 129. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, (1990).
Davidoff Leonore. 1973. The Best Circles: Women and Society In Victorian England. New Jersey: Rowman and Littlefield,
Davidoff Leonore, and Catherine Hall 1994. Family Fortunes: Men and Women of the English Middle Class, 1780–1850. London: Routledge,
Davidoff Leonore, and Belinda Westover, eds. 1986. Our Work, Our Lives, Our Words: Women's History and Women's Work. London: Macmillan Education,
Davies James B. 1981: “Uncertain Lifetime, Consumption and Dissaving in Retirement.” The Journal of Political Economy 89, no. 3 561– 77.Google Scholar
Degler Carl N. 1980. At Odds: Women and the Family in America from the Revolution to the Present. New York: Oxford University Press,
Di Matteo Livio. (1997): “The Determinants of Wealth and Asset Holding in Nineteenth-Century Canada: Evidence from Microdata.” This JOURNAL 57, no. 4 907– 34.Google Scholar
Di Matteo Livio, and Peter J. George. 1998: “Patterns and Determinants of Wealth Among Probated Decedents in Wentworth County, Ontario 1872–1902.” Histoire Sociale-Social History 31, no. 61 1– 33.Google Scholar
Earle Peter. 1989. The Making of the English Middle Classes. Berkeley: University of California Press,
English Barbara. 1984: “Probate Valuations and the Death Duty Registers.” Bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research 57, no. 115 80– 91.Google Scholar
English Barbara. 1987: “Wealth at Death in the Nineteenth Century: The Death Duty Registers.” Bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research 60, no. 128 246.Google Scholar
Erikson Amy Louise. 1993. Women & Property in Early Modern England. London: Routledge,
Family Record Centre, London, Middleton Street. Census Registers. Class RG10, RG11, and RG12.
Floud Roderick. 1993. “Britain, 1860–1914: A Survey.” In The Economic History of Britain Since 1700: Vol 2: 1860–1939, edited by Roderick Floud and D. N. McCloskey, 1– 28. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
Friend Irwin, and Marshall E. Blume. 1973: “The Demand for Risky Assets.” American Economic Review 14, no. 1 132– 52.Google Scholar
Gagan David P. (1976): “The Indivisibility of Land: A Microanalysis of the System of Inheritance in Nineteenth-Century Ontario.” This JOURNAL 36, no. 1 126– 41.Google Scholar
Geddes Richard, and Dean Lueck. 2002: “The Gains from Self-Ownership and the Expansion of Women's Rights.” American Economic Review 92, no. 4 1079– 92.Google Scholar
Gignesi Amy. 2004. “Relinquishing Control: The Married Women's Property Acts in Nineteenth Century America.” Ph.D. diss., American University,
Great Britain. 1881. Office of Population. Census Reports. Registrar General's statistical review of England and Wales, London: H.M.S.O.
Griffin Ben. 2003: “Class, Gender, and Liberalism in Parliament, 1868–1882: The Case of the Married Women's Property Acts.” The Historical Journal 46, no. 1 59– 87.Google Scholar
Hamilton Gillian. (1999): “Property Rights and Transaction Costs in Marriage: Evidence from Prenuptial Contracts.” This JOURNAL 59, no. 1 68– 103.Google Scholar
Henretta James. 1978: “Families and Farms: Mentalite in Pre-Industrial America.” William and Mary Quarterly 35, no. 1 3– 32.Google Scholar
Henretta James, David Brody, and Lynn Dumenil. 2003. America's History. New York: Bedford/St. Martin's Press,
Holcombe Lee. 1973. Victorian Ladies at Work; Middle-Class Working Women in England and Wales, 1850–1914. Toronto: Archon Books,
Holcombe Lee. 1983. Wives and Property: Reform of the Married Women's Property Law in Nineteenth Century England. Toronto: University of Toronto Press,
Horwitz Henry. 1987: “‘The Mess of the Middle Class’ Revisited: The Case of the ‘Big Bourgeoisie’ of Augustan London.” Continuity and Change 2, no. 2 263– 96.Google Scholar
Hurd Michael. 1987: “Savings of the Elderly and Desired Bequests.” American Economic Review 77, no. 3 298– 312.Google Scholar
Inwood Kris. 2000: “The Impact of Married Women's Property Legislation in Victorian Ontario.” The Dalhousie Law Journal 23, no. 2 405– 49.Google Scholar
Inwood Kris, and Sarah Van Sligtenhorst. 2004: “The Social Consequences of Legal Reform: Women and Property in a Canadian Community.” Continuity and Change 19, no. 1 165– 97.Google Scholar
Inwood Kris, and Sue Ingram. 2000. “Property Ownership by Married Women in Victorian Ontario.” Working Paper No. 2000–8, University of Guelph Department of Economics, Guelph, Ontario, Canada,
Kearl J. R., and Clayne L. Pope. (1983): “The Life Cycle in Economic History.” This JOURNAL 43, no. 1 149– 58.Google Scholar
Kerber Linda K. 1986 Women of the Republic: Intellect & Ideology in Revolutionary America. New York: W.W. Norton, (1980).
Kerber Linda K. 1997. Toward an Intellectual History of Women. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press,
Kerber Linda K. 1998. No Constitutional Right To Be Ladies: Women and the Obligations of Citizenship. New York: Hill and Wang Publishers,
Kessler Denis, and Andre Masson. 1989: “Bequest and Wealth Accumulation: Are Some Pieces of the Puzzle Missing?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 3, no. 3 141– 52.Google Scholar
Kotlikoff Laurence. 1988: “Intergenerational Transfers and Savings.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 2, no. 2 41– 58.Google Scholar
Lazarou Kathleen Elizabeth. 1986. Concealed Under Petticoats: Married Women's Property and the Law of Texas 1840–1913. New York: Garland Press,
Lewis Jane. 1993 Women in England 1870–1950. Bloomington, IN: Wheatsheaf Press, (1984).
Lindert Peter, and Jeffrey G. Williamson. 1983: “Reinterpreting Britain's Social Tables, 1688–1913.” Explorations in Economic History 20, no. 1 94– 109.Google Scholar
Menchik Paul, and M. David. 1983: “Income Distribution, Lifetime Savings, and Bequests.” American Economic Review 73, no. 4 672– 90.Google Scholar
Modigliani Franco. (1988): “The Role of Intergenerational Transfers and Life Cycle Savings in the Accumulation of Wealth.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 2, no. 2 15– 40.Google Scholar
Morris R. J. 1976: “In Search of the Modern Urban Middle Class. Record Linkage and Methodology: Leeds 1832.” Urban History Yearbook 1, no. 3 200– 22.Google Scholar
Morris R. J. 1979. “The Middle Class and British Towns and Cities of the Industrial Revolution, 1780–1870.” In The Search for Wealth and Stability: Essays in Economic and Social History, edited by Michael W. Flinn, and T. C. Smout, 91– 113. London, Macmillan,
Morris R. J. 1980. “Middle-Class Culture 1700–1914.” In A History of Modern Leeds, edited by D. Fraser, 200– 22. Manchester: Manchester University Press,
Morris R. J. 1994. “Men, Women, and Property: The Reform of the Married Women's Property Act 1870.” In Landowners, Capitalists, and Entrepreneurs: Essays for Sir John Habakkuk, edited by F. M. L. Thompson, 171– 91. Oxford: Clarendon Press,
Nugent Jeffrey. 1985: “The Old-Age Security Motive for Having Children.” Population and Development Review 11, no. 1 75– 98.Google Scholar
Pope Clayne L. 1989. “Households on the American Frontier: The Distribution of Income and Wealth in Utah 1850–1900.” In Markets in History: Economic Studies of the Past, edited by David W. Galenson, 148– 89. New York: Cambridge University Press,
Public Record Office, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU, United Kingdom. Death Duty, Succession Duty, and state Duty Registers, Class IR26, Volumes for last names beginning with C or D: 1850–1903; Residuary Accounts, Class IR19
Rabkin Peggy A. 1980. Fathers to Daughters: The Legal Foundations of Female Emancipation. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press,
Ransom Roger L, and Richard Sutch. 1986. “The Life-Cycle Transition: A Preliminary Report on Wealth Holding in America.” In Income and Wealth Distribution in Historical Perspective. Utrecht: University of Utrecht Press,
Rubenstein W. D. 1971: “Occupations Among British Millionaires, 1857–1969.” Review of Income and Wealth 17, no. 4 375– 78.Google Scholar
Salmon Marylynn. 1982: “Women and Property in South Carolina: The Evidence from Marriage Settlements, 1730–1830.” William and Mary Quarterly 39, no. 3 655– 85.Google Scholar
Salmon Marylynn. 1986. Women and the Law of Property in Early America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press,
Scott Miriam. 1997. Prerogative Court of Canterbury Wills and Other Probate Records. Kew, Surrey: Public Record Office,
Shammas Carole. 1994: “Re-Assessing the Married Women's Property Act.” Journal of Women's History 6, no. 1 9– 30.Google Scholar
Shammas Carole, Marylyn Salmon, and Michel Dahlin. 1987. Inheritance in America from Colonial Times to the Present. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press,
Shanley Mary Lyndon. 1989. Feminism, Marriage, and the Law in Victorian England. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press,
Siegel Frederick W., and James P. Hoban. 1991: “Measuring Risk Aversion: Allocation, Leverage, and Accumulation.” The Journal of Financial Research 14, no. 1 103– 17.Google Scholar
Siegel Reva B. (1994): “Home as Work: The First Woman's Rights Claims Concerning Wives' Household Labor, 1850–1880.” Yale Law Journal 103, no. 5 1073– 217.Google Scholar
Staves Susan. 1990. Married Women's Separate Property in England, 1660–1883. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press,
Sundstrom William A., and Paul A. David. 1988: “Old-Age Security Motives, Labor Markets, and Farm-Family Fertility in Antebellum America.” Explorations in Economic History 25, no. 2 164– 97.Google Scholar
Warbasse Elizabeth Bowles. 1987. The Changing Legal Rights of Married Women. New York: Garland Press,
West John. 1997 Village Records. London: Phillimore, (1982).
Williamson Jeffrey. 1985. Did British Capitalism Breed Inequality? Boston: Allen & Unwin,