Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T12:01:42.017Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Patent Counts and Textile Invention: A Comment on Griffiths, Hunt, and O’Brien

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2009

Richard J. Sullivan
Richard J. Sullivan
Affiliation:
An economist with the Division of Bank Supervision and Structure, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, 925 Grand Boulevard, Kansas City, MO 64198.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Our best estimates fail to reveal significant quantitative changes in the level of macroeconomic variables (such as per capita output or the savings rate) for Britain during the eighteenth century.1 Efforts that investigate economic activity at the industrial level are, therefore, well placed if the concept of Industrial Revolution is to remain useful. For example, N. F. R. Crafts and T. C. Mills use a segmented quadratic-trend model of industrial production and find that the trend rate of growth accelerated in 1776.2 In addition, my own research has revealed trend acceleration for industrial-level patented invention in the 1760-to-1790 period, which is consistent with Joel Mokyr’s argument that the essence of the Industrial Revolution was a cluster of pivotal “macroinventions” made in this period.3

Type
Notes and Discussions
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 55 , Issue 3 , September 1995 , pp. 666 - 670
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Crafts, N. F. R., and Mills, T. C.. “The Industrial Revolution as a Macroeconomic Epoch: An Alternative View.” The Economic History Review 47, no. 4 (1994): 774–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, , Paul, . “Clio and the Economics of QWERTY.” American Economic Review 75, no. 2 (1985): 332–337.Google Scholar
Gomme, A. A.Patents of Invention: Origin and Growth of the Patent System. London: Longmans Green, 1946–1948.Google Scholar
Griffiths, Trevor, Hunt, Philip A., and O’Brien, Patrick K.. “Inventive Activity in the British Textile Industry, 1700–1800.” this JOURNAL 52, no. 4 (1992): 881–906.Google Scholar
Lerner, , Joshua, . “Science and Agricultural Progress: Quantitative Evidence from England, 1660–1780.” Agricultural History 66, no. 4 (1992): 25–26.Google Scholar
Lindert, , H., Peter, and G. Williamson, Jeffrey. “Revising England’s Social Tables 1688–1812,” Explorations in Economic History 19, no. 4 (1982): 385–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mokyr, , Joel, . The Lever of Riches. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Royal Society of Arts. Transactions 35, (1818): 209–28.Google Scholar
Schankerman, , Mark, and Pakes, Ariel. “Estimates of the Value of Patent Rights in European Countries During the Post-1950 Period.” Economic Journal 96, (1986): 1052–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, , J., Richard “The Timing and Pattern of Technological Development in English Agriculture, 1611–1850,” this JOURNAL 45, no. 2 (1985): 305–14.Google Scholar
Sullivan, , J., Richard “England’s ‘Age of Invention’: The Acceleration of Patents and Patentable Invention during the Industrial Revolution,” Explorations in Economic History 26, no. 4 (1989): 429–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, , J., Richard “The Revolution of Ideas: Widespread Patenting and Invention During the English Industrial Revolution,” this JOURNAL 50, no. 2 (1990): 349–62.Google Scholar
Sullivan, , J., Richard “Estimates of the Value of Patent Rights in Great Britain and freland, 1852–1876,” Economica 61, no. 241 (1994): 37–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, , Trueman, Henry. A History of the Royal Society of Arts. London: John Murray, 1913.Google Scholar