Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T10:08:24.225Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Search for the Sources of Growth: Areas of Ignorance, Old and New

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2009

Moses Abramovitz
Moses Abramovitz
Affiliation:
Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Many economic historians, like most economists, depend on standard growth accounts to provide some quantitative description of the proximate sources of growth, but this is misleading. American growth experience illustrates the difficulty. The seeming major contribution of tangible capital accumulation to nineteenth-century growth was the consequence of scale-dependent and capital-using technological progress. The large twentieth-century contributions of education and R&D conceal technology's new intangible capital-using bias. Additionally, reverse forces run from capital accumulation to technological progress. Without a greater understanding of these interactions, our knowledge of even the proximate sources of growth is incomplete.

Type
Papers Presented at the Fifty-Second Annual Meeting of the Economic History Association
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 53 , Issue 2 , June 1993 , pp. 217 - 243
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1993

References

REFERENCES

Abramovitz, Moses, “Resource and Output Trends in the United States Since 1870,” American Economics Review, 46 (05 1956), pp. 5–23.Google Scholar
Abramovitz, Moses, “Manpower, Capital and Technology,” in Berg, Ivar, ed., Human Resources and Economic Growth (New York, 1972), pp. 50–70.Google Scholar
Abramovitz, Moses, and David, Paul A., “Reinterpreting American Economic Growth: Parables and Realities,” American Economic Review, 63 (05 1973), pp. 428–37.Google Scholar
Abramovitz, Moses, and David, Paul A., “Economic Growth in America: Historical Parables and Realities,” De Economist, 121:3 (1973), pp. 251–72.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth, “The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing,” Review of Economic Studies, 29 (06 1962), pp. 155–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, Ivar, Education and Jobs: The Great Training Robbery (New York, 1970).Google Scholar
Chandler, Alfred D. Jr., Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism (Cambridge, MA, 1990).Google Scholar
David, Paul A., “The Growth of Real Product in the United States Before 1840: New Evidence, Controlled Conjectures,” this Journal, 27 (06 1967), pp. 151–97.Google Scholar
David, Paul A., “Invention and Accumulation in America's Economic Growth: A Nineteenth Century Parable,” in Brunner, Karl and Meltzer, Allan H., eds., International Organization, National Policies and Economic Development (Amsterdam, 1977), pp. 179–228.Google Scholar
David, Paul A., “The Computer and the Dynamo: The Modern Productivity Paradox in a Not-Too-Distant Mirror,” in OECD, Technology and Productivity: The Challenge for Economic Policy (Paris, 1991), pp. 315–48.Google Scholar
David, Paul A., and Solar, Peter, “A Bicentenary Contribution to the History of the Cost of Living in America,” in Uselding, Paul, ed., Research in Economic History, Vol. 2 (Greenwich, CT, 1977), pp. 1–80.Google Scholar
David, Paul A., and van de Klundert, Theo, “Biased Efficiency Growth and Capital-Labor Substitution in the United States, 1899–1960,” American Economic Review, 55 (06 1965), pp. 357–94.Google Scholar
David, Paul A., and Wright, Gavin, “Resource Abundance and American Economic Leadership” (Center for Economic Policy Research Paper No. 267, Stanford University, 08 1992).Google Scholar
Davis, Lance E. et al. , American Economic Growth: An Economist's History of the United States (New York, 1972).Google Scholar
Denison, Edward F., The Sources of Economic Growth in the United States and the Alternatives Before US (New York, 1962).Google Scholar
Denison, Edward F., “Measuring the Contributions of Education (and the Residual) to Economic Growth,” in OECD, The Residual Factor in Economic Growth (Paris, 1965), pp. 13–55.Google Scholar
Denison, Edward F., Why Growth Rates Differ (Washington, DC, 1967).Google Scholar
Denison, Edward F., Trends in American Economic Growth (Washington, DC, 1985).Google Scholar
Economic Report of the President (Washington, DC, annual).Google Scholar
Eisner, Robert, The Total Incomes System of Accounts (Chicago, 1989).Google Scholar
Field, Alexander J., “Modern Business Enterprise as a Capital-Saving Innovation,” this Journal, 47 (06 1987), pp. 473–85.Google Scholar
Field, Alexander J., “The Magnetic Telegraph, Price and Quantity Data, and the New Management of Capital,” this Journal, 52 (06 1992), pp. 401–13.Google Scholar
Freeman, Richard B., The Overeducated American (New York, 1976).Google Scholar
Gallman, Robert E., and Weiss, Thomas, “The Service Industries in the Nineteenth Century,” in Fuchs, Victor R., ed., Production and Productivity in the Service Industries (New York, 1969), pp. 287–352.Google Scholar
Jorgenson, Dale W., Gollop, F. M., and Fraumeni, B. M., Productivity and U.S. Economic Growth (Cambridge, MA, 1987).Google Scholar
Kaplan, David L., and Casey, M. Claire, Occupational Trends in the U.S., 1900–1950 (Bureau of the Census Working Paper No. 3, Washington, DC, 1958).Google Scholar
Katz, Lawrence F., and Murphy, Kevin M., “Changes in Relative Wages, 1963–1987: Supply and Demand Factors,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107 (02 1992), pp. 35–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendrick, John W., Productivity Trends in the United States (Princeton, 1961).Google Scholar
Kendrick, John W., Postwar Productivity Trends in the United States, 1948–1969 (New York, 1973).Google Scholar
Kuznets, Simon S., National Product Since 1869 (New York, 1946).Google Scholar
Lebergott, Stanley, Manpower in Economic Growth: The American Record Since 1800 (New York, 1964).Google Scholar
Levy, Frank, and Murnane, Richard J., “U.S. Earnings Levels and Earnings Inequality: A Review of Recent Trends and Proposed Explanations,” Journal of Economic Literature, 30 (09 1992), pp. 1333–81.Google Scholar
Nelson, Richard R., “Aggregate Production Functions and Medium Range Growth Projections,” American Economic Review, 54 (09 1964), pp. 575–606.Google Scholar
Parker, William N., “Productivity Growth in American Grain Farming: An Analysis of Its Nineteenth Century Sources,” in Fogel, R. W. and Engerman, Stanley, eds., The Reinterpretation of American Economic History (New York, 1972), pp. 175–86.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Nathan, “Learning by Using,” in Rosenberg, Nathan, ed., Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics (Cambridge and New York, 1982), pp. 120–40.Google Scholar
Schultz, Theodore W., “Capital Formation by Education,” Journal of Political Economy, 68 (12 1960), pp. 571–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, Theodore W., “Education and Economic Growth,” in Henry, Nelson B., ed., Social Forces Influencing American Education (Chicago, 1961), pp. 46–88.Google Scholar
Solow, Robert, “Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function,” Review of Economic Statistics, 47 (08 1957), pp. 312–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solow, Robert M., “Investment and Technical Progress,” in Arrow, Kenneth J., Samuel, Karlin, and Patrick, Suppes, eds., Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences, 1959 (Stanford, 1960), pp. 89–104.Google Scholar
Solow, Robert M., “Technical Progress, Capital Formation, and Economic Growth,” American Economic Review Proceedings, 52 (05 1962), pp. 76–86.Google Scholar
Trescott, Paul B., “The U.S. Government and National Income, 1790–1860,” in Parker, William N., ed., Trends in the American Economy in the Nineteenth Century (Princeton, 1960), pp. 337–61.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census, Census of the Population, 1950, “Education” (Washington, DC, 1953).Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, “Trends in Multifactor Productivity, 1948–81, Bulletin No. 2178 (Washington, DC, 09 1983).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce, Survey of Current Business (Washington, DC, monthly).Google Scholar
Welch, Finis, “The Effect of Cohort Size on Earnings: The Baby-Boom Babies' Financial Bust,” Journal of Political Economy, 87 (10 1979), pp. 865–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar