Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:18:56.585Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

We Spend How Much? Misperceptions, Innumeracy, and Support for the Foreign Aid in the United States and Great Britain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2017

Thomas J. Scotto ,
Jason Reifler ,
David Hudson  and
Jennifer vanHeerde-Hudson
Thomas J. Scotto
Affiliation:
School of Government and Public Policy, University of Strathclyde, McCance Building, Glasgow G1 1XQ, UK e-mail: tom.scotto@strath.ac.uk
Jason Reifler
Affiliation:
Department of Politics, University of Exeter, Armory Building, Exeter EX4 4RJ, UK e-mail: j.reifler@exeter.ac.uk
David Hudson
Affiliation:
International Development Department, Muirhead Tower, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston B15 2TT, UK e-mail: d.e.hudson@bham.ac.uk
Jennifer vanHeerde-Hudson
Affiliation:
School of Public Policy, University College London, 29–31 Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9QU, UK e-mail: jennifer.hudson@ucl.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Majorities of citizens in high-income countries often oppose foreign aid spending. One popular explanation is that the public overestimates the percentage and amount of taxpayer funds that goes toward overseas aid. Does expressing aid flows in dollar and/or percentage terms shift public opinion toward aid? We report the results of an experiment examining differences in support for aid spending as a function of the information American and British respondents receive about foreign aid spending. In both nations, providing respondents with information about foreign aid spending as a percentage of the national budget significantly reduces support for cuts. The findings suggest that support for aid can be increased, but significant opposition to aid spending remains.

Keywords

aid spendinginnumeracypublic opinionframing development communications
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Experimental Political Science , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , Summer 2017 , pp. 119 - 128
Copyright
Copyright © The Experimental Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alba, R., Rumbaut, R. G., and Marotz, K.. 2005. “A Distorted Nation: Perceptions of Racial/Ethnic Group Sizes and Attitudes Toward Immigrants and Other Minorities.” Social Forces 84 (2): 901–919.Google Scholar
Baker, A. 2015. “Race, Paternalism, and Foreign Aid: Evidence from U.S. Public Opinion.” American Political Science Review 109 (1): 93–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chong, D. and Druckman, J.. 2007. “Framing Public Opinion in Competitive Democracies.” American Political Science Review 101 (4): 637–655.Google Scholar
Citrin, J. and Sides, J.. 2008. Immigration and the Imagined Community in Europe and the United States. Political Studies 56 (1): 33–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gigerenzer, G. 2001. Why Heuristics Work. Perspectives on Psychological Science 3 (1): 20–29.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G. and Edwards, A.. 2003. “Simple Tools for Understanding Risks: From Innumeracy to Insight.” BMJ: British Medical Journal 327 (7417): 741–744.Google Scholar
Gilens, M. 2001. “Political Ignorance and Collective Policy Preferences.” American Political Science Review 95 (2): 379–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henson, S. and Lindstrom, J.. 2013 “A Mile Wide and an Inch Deep? Understanding Public Support for Aid: The Case of the United Kingdom.” World Development 42 (1): 67–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, D. and vanHeerde-Hudson, J.. 2012. “Mile Wide and an Inch Deep: Surveys of Public Attitudes Towards Development Aid.” International Journal of Development Education and Global Learning 4 (1): 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Development Committee. 2009. Aid Under Pressure: Support for Development Assistance in a Global Economic Downturn. UK Parliament International Development Committee. (http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200809/cmselect/cmintdev/179/179i.pdf), accessed September 6, 2015.Google Scholar
Ipsos MORI. 2015. Perils of Perception 2015: Perceptions are not reality: what the world gets wrong. (https://www.ipsos-mori.com/researchpublications/researcharchive/3664/Perils-of-Perception-2015.aspx), accessed February 3, 2016.Google Scholar
Kahan, D. M., Peters, E., Dawson, E. C., and Slovic, P.. 2013. Motivated Numeracy and Enlightened Self-Government. Public Law Working Paper 307. Yale Law School.Google Scholar
Kuklinski, J. H., Quirk, P. J., Jerit, J., Schwieder, D., and Rich, R. F.. 2000. “Misinformation and the Currency of Democratic Citizenship.” Journal of Politics 62 (3): 790–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, E. D. and Sides, J.. 2014. “The Consequences of Political Innumeracy.” Research & Politics 1 (2): pp. 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, E. 2013. “The Budget Myth that Just Won’t Die: Americans Still Think 28 Percent of the Budget goes to Foreign Aid.” Washington Post. (http://tinyurl.com/oakh8rv), accessed August 24, 2015.Google Scholar
Mérola, V. and Hitt, M. P. 2015. “Numeracy and the Persuasive Effect of Policy Information and Party Cues.” Public Opinion Quarterly (Forthcoming). doi:10.1093/poq/nfv051.Google Scholar
Nyhan, B. and Reifler, J.. 2010. “When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions.” Political Behavior 32 (2): 303–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD. 2016. Net ODA (Indicator). (http://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?r=439042), accessed February 03, 2016.Google Scholar
Paxton, P. and Knack, S.. 2012. “Individual and Country-Level Factors Affecting Support for Foreign Aid.” International Political Science Review. 33 (2): 171–192.Google Scholar
Pearson, L. B. 1969. Partners in Development: Report of the Commission on International Development. London: Pall Mall Press.Google Scholar
Peters, E. 2006. “Beyond Comprehension: The Role of Numeracy in Judgments and Decisions.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 21 (1): 31–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Provost, C. and Tran, M.. 2013. “Aid: How Much does the UK Spend, Why it’s Important and How it Works.” The Guardian. (http://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2013/mar/20/uk-aid-spend-important-works), accessed September 6, 2015.Google Scholar
Stern, M. 1998. Development Aid: What the Public Thinks. New York: Office of Development Studies, Bureau for Development Policy, United Nations Development Programme.Google Scholar
van Heerde, J. and Hudson, D.. 2010. “The Righteous Considereth the Cause of the Poor? Public Attitudes towards Poverty in Developing Countries.” Political Studies 58 (3): 389–409.Google Scholar
Wegwarth, Odette. 2013. “Statistical Illiteracy in Residents: What They Do Not Learn Today Will Hurt Their Patients Tomorrow.” Journal of Graduate Medical Education 5 (2): 340–341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: PDF

Scotto et al supplementary material

Appendix A

Download Scotto et al supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 232 KB