Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T13:21:24.010Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Value of Trading Consolidation: Evidence from the Exercise of Warrants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Yakov Amihud
Affiliation:
yamihud@stern.nyu.edu, Stern School of Business, New York University, 44 West Fourth Street, New York, NY 10012;
Beni Lauterbach
Affiliation:
lauteb@mail.biu.ac.il, School of Business Administration, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan 52899, Israel;
Haim Mendelson
Affiliation:
haim@stanford.edu, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, 518 Memorial Way, Stanford, CA 94305.

Abstract

We study the effect of trading consolidation by examining the response of liquidity and stock price to the exercise of deep in-the-money corporate warrants. This enables a relatively clean test of the value of trading consolidation. The exercise at the warrant expiration is fully anticipated and has no information content. An effect can come from the value of trading consolidation that improves liquidity. Indeed, we find that liquidity and stock prices both increase significantly at warrant expiration. Further, the price increase is positively related to the pre-exercise extent of fragmentation, to post-exercise improvement in stock liquidity, and to the proportional increase in the number of shares following the warrant exercise.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amihud, Y.; Hauser, S.; and Kirsh, A.Allocations, Adverse Selection and Cascades in IPOs: Evidence from the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange.” Journal of Financial Economics, 68 (2003), 137158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amihud, Y., and Mendelson, H.Asset Pricing and the Bid-Ask Spread.” Journal of Financial Economics, 17 (1986), 223249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amihud, Y., and Mendelson, H.Trading Mechanisms and Stock Returns: An Empirical Investigation.” Journal of Finance, 42 (1987), 533553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amihud, Y., and Mendelson, H.Liquidity and Asset Prices: Financial Management Implications.” Financial Management, 17 (1988), 515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amihud, Y., and Mendelson, H. “Option Markets Integration.” Paper submitted to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (1989).Google Scholar
Amihud, Y., and Mendelson, H. “How (Not) to Integrate the European Capital Markets.” In European Financial Integration, Giovannini, A. and Mayer, C., eds. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Univ. Press (1991).Google Scholar
Amihud, Y., and Mendelson, H.A New Approach to the Regulation of Trading across Securities Markets.” New York University Law Review, 71 (1996), 14111466.Google Scholar
Amihud, Y.; Mendelson, H.; and Lauterbach, B.Market Microstructure and Securities Values: Evidence from the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange.” Journal of Financial Economics, 45 (1997), 365390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bessembinder, H., and Kaufman, H. M.A Cross-Exchange Comparison of Execution Costs and Information Flow for NYSE-Listed Stocks.” Journal of Financial Economics, 46 (1997), 293319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhattacharya, A. K.Option Expirations and Treasury Bond Futures Prices.” Journal of Futures Markets, 7 (1987), 4964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, M. J., and Subrahmanyam, A.Market Microstructure and Asset Pricing: On the Compensation for Illiquidity in Stock Returns.” Journal of Financial Economics, 41 (1996), 441464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, S. J., and Warner, J. B.Measuring Security Price Performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 8 (1980), 205258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, S. J., and Warner, J. B.Using Daily Stock Returns: The Case of Event Studies.” Journal of Financial Economics, 14 (1985), 331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, K. J.; Conroy, R. M.; and Maier, S. F. “Order Flow and Quality of the Market.” In Market Making and the Changing Structure of the Securities Industry, Amihud, Y., Ho, T., and Schwartz, R., eds. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books (1985).Google Scholar
Cohen, K. J.; Maier, S. F.; Schwartz, R. A.; and Whitcomb, D. K.An Analysis of the Economic Justification for Consolidation in a Secondary Security Market.” Journal of Banking and Finance, 6 (1982), 117136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, K. J.; Maier, S. F.; Schwartz, R. A.; and Whitcomb, D. K.The Microstructure of Securities Markets. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall (1986).Google Scholar
Danielsen, B. R., and Sorescu, S. M.Why Do Option Introductions Depress Stock Prices? A Study of Diminishing Short Sale Constraints.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 36 (2001), 451484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fang, Z “No Gains from Dual Listing in the Shanghai Stock Exchange.” In Advances in Pacific Basin Financial Markets, Bos, T. and Fetherston, T. A., eds. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press (1997).Google Scholar
Green, R. CInvestment Incentives, Debt and Warrants.” Journal of Financial Economics, 13 (1984), 115136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, L. EConsolidation, Fragmentation, Segmentation and Regulation.” Financial Markets, Institutions and Instruments, 2 (1993), 128.Google Scholar
Hendershott, T., and Mendelson, H.Crossing Networks and Dealer Markets: Competition and Performance.” Journal of Finance, 55 (2000), 20712116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalay, AThe Ex-Dividend Behavior of Stock Prices: A Re-Examination of the Clientele Effect.” Journal of Finance, 37 (1982), 10591070.Google Scholar
Khan, W. A., and Baker, H. K.Unlisted Trading Privileges, Liquidity and Stock Returns.” Journal of Financial Research, 16 (1993), 221236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klemkosky, R. CThe Impact of Option Expirations on Stock Prices.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 13 (1978), 507517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lauterbach, B., and Wohl, A.A Note on Price Noises and Their Correction Process: Evidence from Two Equal-Payoff Government Bonds.” Journal of Banking and Finance, 25 (2001), 597612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, C. M. C.Market Integration and Price Execution for NYSE-Listed Securities.” Journal of Finance, 48 (1993), 10091038.Google Scholar
Malatesta, P. H., and Thompson, R.Partially Anticipated Events.” Journal of Financial Economics, 14 (1986), 237250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendelson, H.Random Competitive Exchange: Price Distributions and Gains from Trade.” Journal of Economic Theory, 37 (1985), 254280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendelson, H. “Consolidation, Fragmentation and Market Performance.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, (1987), 189207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neal, R.Potential Competition and Actual Competition in Equity Options.” Journal of Finance, 42 (1987), 511537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Officer, D. T., and Trennepohl, G. L.Price Behavior of Corporate Equities near Option Expiration Dates.” Financial Management, 10 (1981), 7580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagano, M., and Röell, A.Trading Systems in European Stock Exchanges: Current Performance and Policy Options.” Economic Policy, 10 (1990), 65113.Google Scholar
Pagano, M., and Röell, A. “Shifting Gears: An Economic Evaluation of the Reform of the Paris Bourse.” In Financial Market Liberalization and the Role of Banks, Conti, V. and Hamaui, R., eds. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Univ. Press (1993).Google Scholar
Pope, P. F., and Yadav, P. K.The Impact of Option Expiration on Underlying Stocks: the UK Evidence.” Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 19 (1992), 329343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roll, R.A Simple Explicit Measure of the Effective Bid-Ask Spread in an Efficient Market.” Journal of Finance, 39 (1984), 11271139.Google Scholar
Schultz, P.Unit Initial Public Offerings: A Form of Staged Financing.” Journal of Financial Economics, 34 (1993), 199229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, P.Regulatory and Legal Pressures and the Costs of Nasdaq Trading.” Review of Financial Studies, 13 (2000), 917957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorescu, S. M.The Effect of Options on Stock Prices: 1973 to 1995.” Journal of Finance, 55 (2000), 487514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, H.Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity.” Econometrica, 48 (1980), 817838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar