Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T21:58:12.070Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The concentration distribution produced by shear dispersion of solute in Poiseuille flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

A. N. Stokes  and
N. G. Barton
A. N. Stokes
Affiliation:
CSIBO Division of Mathematics and Statistics, Private Bag Number 10, Clayton, Vic., Australia 3168
N. G. Barton
Affiliation:
CSIRO Division of Mathematics and Statistics, PO Box 218, Lindfield, NSW, Australia 2070
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

One of G. I. Taylor's most famous papers concerns the large-time behaviour of a cloud of soluble matter which has been injected into a solvent in laminar flow in a pipe. In the past thirty years, a number of successful attempts have been made to derive differently or extend Taylor's result, which is that the cloud of solute eventually takes a Gaussian profile in the flow direction. The present paper is another examination of this well-worked problem, but this time from the viewpoint of a formal integral transform representation of the solution. This approach leads to a better understanding of the solution; it also enables efficient numerical computations, and leads to extended and new asymptotic expansions.

A Laplace transform in time and a Fourier transform in the flow direction leaves a complicated eigenvalue problem to be solved to give the cross-sectional behaviour. This eigenvalue problem is examined in detail, and the transforms are then inverted to give the concentration distribution. Both numerical and asymptotic methods are used. The numerical procedures lead to an accurate description of the concentration distribution, and the method could be generalized to compute dispersion in general parallel flows. The asymptotic procedures use two different classes of eigenvalues to give leading- and trailing-edge approximations for the solute cloud at small times. Meanwhile, at larger times, one eigenvalue branch dominates the solution and Taylor's result is recovered and extended using'the computer to generate extra terms in the approximation. Sixteen terms in the approximation are calculated, and a continued fraction expansion is deduced to enhance the accuracy.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 210 , January 1990 , pp. 201 - 221
Copyright
© 1990 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, M. & Stegun, I. A. 1965 Handbook of Mathematical Functions. Dover.
Aris, R. 1956 On the dispersion of a solute in a fluid flowing through a tube.. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 235, 67–77.Google Scholar
Barton, N. G. 1983 The dispersion of solute from time-dependent releases in parallel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 136, 243–267.Google Scholar
Barton, N. G. & Stokes, A. N. 1986 A computational method for shear dispersion in parallel flow. In Proc. Computational Techniques and Applications Conf., CTAC-85 (ed. J. Noye & R. May), pp. 345–355. North-Holland.
Chatwin, P. C. 1970 The approach to normality of the concentration distribution of a solute flowing along a straight pipe. J. Fluid Mech. 43, 321–352.Google Scholar
Chatwin, P. C. 1973 On the longitudinal dispersion of dye whose concentration varies harmonically with time. J. Fluid Mech. 58, 657–667.Google Scholar
Gance, A. E. De & Johns, L. E. 1978a The theory of dispersion of chemically active solutes in a rectilinear flow field. Appl. Sci. Res. 34, 189–225.Google Scholar
Gance, A. E. De & Johns, L. E. 1978b On the dispersion coefficients for Poiseuille flow in a circular cylinder. Appl. Sci. Res. 34, 227–258.Google Scholar
Gill, W. N. & Ananthakrishnan, V. 1967 Laminar dispersion in capillaries. Part 4. The slug stimulus. AIChE J. 13, 801–807.Google Scholar
Gill, W. N. & Sankarasubramanian, R. 1970 Exact analysis of unsteady convective diffusion.. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 316, 341–350.Google Scholar
Houseworth, J. E. 1984 Shear dispersion and residence time for laminar flow in capillary tubes. J. Fluid Mech. 142, 289–308.Google Scholar
Jayaraj, K. & Subramanian, R. S. 1978 On relaxation phenomena in field-flow fractionation. Sep. Sci. Tech. 13, 791–817.Google Scholar
Lighthill, M. J. 1966 Initial development of diffusion in Poiseuille flow. J. Inst. Maths Applics. 2, 97–108.Google Scholar
Philip, J. R. 1963a The theory of dispersal during laminar flow in tubes. I. Austral. J. Phys. 16, 298–299.Google Scholar
Philip, J. R. 1963b The theory of dispersal during laminar flow in tubes. II. Austral. J. Phys. 16, 300–310.Google Scholar
Smith, R. 1981 A delay-diffusion description for contaminant dispersion. J. Fluid Mech. 105, 469–486.Google Scholar
Smith, R. 1987 Diffusion in shear flows made easy: the Taylor limit. J. Fluid Mech. 175, 201–214.Google Scholar
Stokes, A. N. & Barton, N. G. 1985 Solution of dispersion in Poiseuille flow by integral transforms. Third Australasian Conf. on Heat and Mass Transfer, University of Melbourne, pp. 217–224.
Taylor, G. I. 1953 Dispersion of soluble matter in solvent flowing slowly through a tube.. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 219, 186–203.Google Scholar