Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-gndc8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T05:28:25.132Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Direct numerical simulation of a supersonic turbulent boundary layer at Mach 2.5

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2000

STEPHEN E. GUARINI
Affiliation:
NASA-Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA
ROBERT D. MOSER
Affiliation:
Department of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
KARIM SHARIFF
Affiliation:
NASA-Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA
ALAN WRAY
Affiliation:
NASA-Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA

Abstract

A direct numerical simulation of a supersonic turbulent boundary layer has been performed. We take advantage of a technique developed by Spalart for incompressible flow. In this technique, it is assumed that the boundary layer grows so slowly in the streamwise direction that the turbulence can be treated as approximately homogeneous in this direction. The slow growth is accounted for by a coordinate transformation and a multiple-scale analysis. The result is a modified system of equations, in which the flow is homogeneous in both the streamwise and spanwise directions, and which represents the state of the boundary layer at a given streamwise location. The equations are solved using a mixed Fourier and B-spline Galerkin method.

Results are presented for a case having an adiabatic wall, a Mach number of M = 2.5, and a Reynolds number, based on momentum integral thickness and wall viscosity, of Reθ′ = 849. The Reynolds number based on momentum integral thickness and free-stream viscosity is Reθ = 1577. The results indicate that the Van Driest transformed velocity satisfies the incompressible scalings and a small logarithmic region is obtained. Both turbulence intensities and the Reynolds shear stress compare well with the incompressible simulations of Spalart when scaled by mean density. Pressure fluctuations are higher than in incompressible flow. Morkovin's prediction that streamwise velocity and temperature fluctuations should be anti-correlated, which happens to be supported by compressible experiments, does not hold in the simulation. Instead, a relationship is found between the rates of turbulent heat and momentum transfer. The turbulent kinetic energy budget is computed and compared with the budgets from Spalart's incompressible simulations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2000 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)