Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T15:45:35.770Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A hydrodynamical theory of conservative bounded density currents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2006

M. W. Moncrieff
Affiliation:
National Center for Atmospheric Research, Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307, USA
D. W. K. So
Affiliation:
Space and Atmospheric Physics Group, Physics Department, Imperial College London SW7 2BZ, UK

Abstract

The Benjamin (1968) analysis of a two-fluid density current is extended to include the effect of vorticity within the current. In the case of constant vorticity, the density-current depth is shown to lie between the limits of half and two-thirds of the channel depth. More general vorticity distributions are also considered, namely those that have: (i) a maximum in the upper and lower regions of the density current; and (ii) a maximum in the middle of the density current. In the former, as in the case of constant vorticity, density-current structures exist, whereas in the latter, deep overturning circulations predominate which can cause a ‘blocking’ of the upstream inflow. A generalized propagation formula which includes the effects of finite depth and rear inflow into the density current is established and the uniqueness issue is considered.

The analysis is further extended to a three-fluid system, composed of physically distinct component flows, namely, a density current, an overturning updraught region in upper levels ahead of the density current and an updraught in which the fluid ascends without overturning to its outflow level. Two types of behaviour are identified. First, a symmetric mode in which the density current and the overturning updraught have the same depth and, second, an asymmetric mode with solutions restricted to a certain parameter range. A special case in which the fluids have the same density illustrates the basic dynamics of the problem and also the nature of the vertical transport of momentum.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
1989 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benjamin, T. B.: 1968 Gravity currents and related phenomena. J. Fluid Mech. 31, 209248.Google Scholar
Britter, R. E. & Simpson, J. E., 1978 Experiments on the dynamics of a gravity current head. J. Fluid Mech. 88, 223240.Google Scholar
Crook, N. A. & Miller, M. J., 1985 A numerical and analytical study of atmospheric undular bores. Q. J. R. Met. Soc. 111, 225242.Google Scholar
Holyer, J. Y. & Huppert, H. E., 1980 Gravity currents entering a two-layer fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 100, 739767.Google Scholar
von Kármán, T.1940 The engineer grapples with non-linear problems. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 46, 615683.Google Scholar
Moncrieff, M. W.: 1978 The dynamical structure of two-dimensional steady convection in constant vertical shear. Q. J. R. Met. Soc. 104, 563567.Google Scholar
Moncrieff, M. W.: 1981 A theory of organised steady convection and its transport properties. Q. J. R. Soc. 107, 2950.Google Scholar
Moncrieff, M. W.: 1988 Analytical models of narrow cold frontal rainbands and related phenomena. J. Atmos. Sci. (in press).Google Scholar
Simpson, J. E.: 1969 A comparison between laboratory and atmospheric density currents. Q. J. R. Met Soc. 95, 758765.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. E.: 1982 Gravity currents in the laboratory, atmosphere and ocean. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 14, 213234.Google Scholar
Wallis, G. B. & Dobson, J. E., 1973 The onset of slugging in horizontal stratified air-water flow. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 1, 173193.Google Scholar