Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T03:19:59.210Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The influence of the inertially dominated outer region on the rheology of a dilute dispersion of low-Reynolds-number drops or rigid particles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2011

GANESH SUBRAMANIAN ,
DONALD L. KOCH ,
JINGSHENG ZHANG  and
CHAO YANG
GANESH SUBRAMANIAN*
Affiliation:
Engineering Mechanics Unit, Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research, Jakkur, Bangalore 560064, India
DONALD L. KOCH
Affiliation:
School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
JINGSHENG ZHANG
Affiliation:
Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
CHAO YANG
Affiliation:
Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
*
†Email address for correspondence: sganesh@jncasr.ac.in
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We calculate the rheological properties of a dilute emulsion of neutrally buoyant nearly spherical drops at O(φRe3/2) in a simple shear flow(u∞ = x211, being the shear rate) as a function of the ratio of the dispersed- and continuous-phase viscosities (λ = /μ). Here, φ is the volume fraction of the dispersed phase and Re is the micro-scale Reynolds number. The latter parameter is a dimensionless measure of inertial effects on the scale of the dispersed-phase constituents and is defined as Re = a2ρ/μ, a being the drop radius and ρ the common density of the two phases. The analysis is restricted to the limit φ, Re ≪ 1, when hydrodynamic interactions between drops may be neglected, and the velocity field in a region around the drop of the order of its own size is governed by the Stokes equations at leading order. The dominant contribution to the rheology at O(φRe3/2), however, arises from the so-called outer region where the leading-order Stokes approximation ceases to be valid. The relevant length scale in this outer region, the inertial screening length, results from a balance of convection and viscous diffusion, and is O(aRe−1/2) for simple shear flow in the limit Re ≪ 1. The neutrally buoyant drop appears as a point-force dipole on this scale. The rheological calculation at O(φRe3/2) is therefore based on a solution of the linearized Navier–Stokes equations forced by a point dipole. The principal contributions to the bulk rheological properties at this order arise from inertial corrections to the drop stresslet and Reynolds stress integrals. The theoretical calculations for the stresslet components are validated via finite volume simulations of a spherical drop at finite Re; the latter extend up to Re ≈ 10.

Combining the results of our O(φRe3/2) analysis with the known rheology of a dilute emulsion to O(φRe) leads to the following expressions for the relative viscosity (μe), and the non-dimensional first (N1) and second normal stress differences (N2) to O(φRe3/2): μe = 1 + φ[(5λ+2)/(2(λ+1))+0.024Re3/2(5λ+2)2/(λ+1)2]; N1=φ[−Re4(3λ2+3λ+1)/(9(λ+1)2)+0.066Re3/2(5λ+2)2/(λ+1)2] and N2 = φ[Re2(105λ2+96λ+35)/(315(λ+1)2)−0.085Re3/2(5λ+2)2/(λ+1)2].

Thus, for small but finite Re, inertia endows an emulsion with a non-Newtonian rheology even in the infinitely dilute limit, and in particular, our calculations show that, aside from normal stress differences, such an emulsion also exhibits a shear-thickening behaviour. The results for a suspension of rigid spherical particles are obtained in the limit λ → ∞.

JFM classification

Complex Fluids: Emulsions Multiphase and Particle-laden Flows: Particle/fluid flow Non-Newtonian Flows: Rheology
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 674 , 10 May 2011 , pp. 307 - 358
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Asmolov, E. S. & Feuillebois, F. 2010 Far-field disturbance flow induced by a small non-neutrally buoyant sphere in a linear shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 643, 449–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auton, T. R. 1987 The lift force on a spherical body in a rotational flow. J. Fluid Mech. 183, 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auton, T. R., Hunt, J. C. R. & Prud'homme, M. 1988 The force exerted on a body in inviscid unsteady non-uniform rotational flow. J. Fluid Mech. 197, 241–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. 1967 Introduction to Fluid Dynamics, p. 348. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bottin, S., Dauchot, O. & Daviaud, F. 1997 Intermittency in a locally forced plane Couette flow. Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 (22), 4377–4380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bottin, S., Dauchot, O., Daviaud, F. & Manneville, P. 1998 Experimental evidence of streamwise vortices as finite amplitude solutions in transitional plane Couette flow. Phys. Fluids 10 (10), 2597–2607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, J. F. & Morris, J. F. 1997 Microstructure of strongly sheared suspensions and its impact on rheology and diffusion. J. Fluid Mech. 348, 103–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bretherton, F. P. 1962 Slow viscous motion round a cylinder in a simple shear. J. Fluid Mech. 12, 591–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cherhabili, A. & Ehrenstein, U. 1995 Spatially localized two-dimensional finite amplitude states in plane Couette flow. Eur. J. Mech. B/Fluids 14, 677–696.Google Scholar
Clever, R. & Busse, F. 1997 Tertiary and quaternary solutions for plane Couette flow. J. Fluid Mech. 344, 137–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darbyshire, A. G. & Mullin, T. 1995 Transition to turbulence in constant-mass-flux pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. 289, 83–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dauchot, O. & Daviaud, F. 1995 Finite amplitude perturbation and spots growth mechanism in plane Couette flow. Phys. Fluids 7 (2), 335–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ding, E. J. & Aidun, C. K. 2000 The dynamics and scaling law for particles suspended in shear flow with inertia. J. Fluid Mech. 423, 317–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elrick, D. E. 1962 Source functions for diffusion in uniform shear flow. Austral. J. Phys. 15, 283–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foister, R. T. & Van de Ven, T. G. M. 1980 Diffusion of Brownian particles in shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 96, 105–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankel, N. A. & Acrivos, A. 1970 The constitutive equation for a dilute emulsion. J. Fluid Mech. 44, 65–78.Google Scholar
Gradshteyn, I. S. & Ryzhik, I. M. 1965 Table of Integrals, Series and Products. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Halcrow, J., Gibson, J. F., Cvitanovic, P. & Viswananth, D. 2009 Heteroclinic connections in plane Couette flow. J. Fluid Mech. 621, 365–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Happel, J. & Brenner, H. 1973 Low Reynolds Number Hydrodynamics. Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Kim, S. & Karrila, S. J. 1991 Microhydrodynamics: Principles and Selected Applications. Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
Kossack, C. A. & Acrivos, A. 1974 Steady simple shear flow past a circular cylinder at moderate Reynolds number: a numerical solution. J. Fluid Mech. 66, 353–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulkarni, M. P. & Morris, J. F. 2008 Suspension properties at finite Reynolds number from simulated shear flow. Phys. Fluids 20, 040602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leal, L. G. 1992 Laminar Flow and Convective Transport Processes. Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
Li, X. & Sarkar, K. 2005 Effects of inertia on the rheology of a dilute emulsion of viscous drops in steady shear. J. Rheol. 49, 1377–1394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lighthill, M. J. 1956 Drift. J. Fluid Mech. 1, 31–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, C. J., Peery, J. H. & Schowalter, W. R. 1970 Simple shear flow around a rigid sphere: inertial effects and suspension rheology. J. Fluid Mech. 44, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mao, Z. S. & Chen, J. Y. 1997 Numerical solution of viscous flow past a solid sphere with the control volume formulation. Chin. J. Chem. Engng 5 (2), 105.Google Scholar
Matas, J. P., Morris, J. F. & Guazzelli, E. 2003 Transition to turbulence in particular pipe flow. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (1), 014501–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikulencak, D. R. & Morris, J. F. 2004 Stationary shear flow around fixed and free bodies at finite Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 520, 215–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagata, M. 1990 Three-dimensional finite-amplitude solutions in plane Couette flow: bifurcation from infinity. J. Fluid Mech. 217, 519–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proudman, I. & Pearson, J. R. A. 1957 Expansions at small Reynolds numbers for the flow past a sphere and a circular cylinder. J. Fluid Mech. 2, 237–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberston, C. R. & Acrivos, A. 1970 Low-Reynolds-number shear flow past a rotating circular cylinder. Part 1. Momentum transfer. J. Fluid Mech. 40, 685–703.Google Scholar
Ryskin, G. 1980 The extensional viscosity of a dilute suspension of spherical particles at intermediate microscale Reynolds numbers. J. Fluid Mech. 99, 513–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saffman, P. G. 1965 The lift on a small sphere in a slow shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 22, 385–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, P. J. & Henningson, D. S. 2001 Stability and Transition in Shear Flows. Springer.Google Scholar
Schowalter, W. R., Chaffey, C. E. & Brenner, H. 1968 Rheological behaviour of a dilute emulsion. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 26, 152–160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stone, H. A., Brady, J. F. & Lovalenti, P. M. 2000 Inertial effects on the rheology of suspensions and on the motion of individual particles (unpublished).Google Scholar
Subramanian, G. & Koch, D. L. 2006 Inertial effects on the transfer of heat or mass from neutrally buoyant spheres in a steady linear velocity field. Phys. Fluids 18, 073302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, G. I. 1932 The viscosity of a fluid containing small drops of another fluid. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 146 (501), 41–48.Google Scholar
Vivek Raja, R., Subramanian, G. & Koch, D. L. 2010 Inertial effects on the rheology of a dilute emulsion. J. Fluid Mech. 646, 255–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, L. Y., Yin, X., Koch, D. L. & Cohen, C. 2009 Hydrodynamic diffusion and mass transfer across a sheared suspension of neutrally buoyant particles. Phys. Fluids 21, 033303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar