Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T01:03:13.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The interaction between a steady jet flow and a supersonic blade tip

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

N. Peake
N. Peake
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Silver Street, Cambridge, CB3 9EW, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The potentially high level of noise generated by modern counter-rotation propellers has attracted considerable interest and concern, and one of the most potent mechanisms involved is the unsteady interaction between the tip vortex shed from the tips of the forward blade row and the rear row. In this paper a model problem is considered, in which the tip vortex is represented by a jet of constant axial velocity, which is convected at right angles to itself by a uniform supersonic mean flow, and which is cut by a rigid airfoil with its chord aligned along the mean flow direction. Ffowcs Williams & Guo have previously considered this problem for an infinite-span airfoil and a circular jet; in this paper we extend their analysis to include the effects of the presence of the second-row blade tip on the interaction, by considering a semi-infinite-span airfoil. As a first attempt, the case of a highly compact jet, represented by a delta-function upwash on the airfoil, is considered, and both the total lift on the airfoil and the radiation are investigated. The presence of the airfoil corner and side edge is seen to cause the lift to decay in time from its infinite-span value towards zero, due to a spanwise motion round the side edge; whilst the radiation is shown to be composed of two Signals, the first received directly from the interaction between the jet and the leading edge, and the second resulting from the diffraction of sound waves emanating from the leading edge by the side edge. The effect of choosing a more diffuse upwash distribution is then considered, in which case it becomes clear that the first signal has a considerably larger amplitude, and shorter duration, than the second, diffracted signal.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 248 , March 1993 , pp. 543 - 566
Copyright
© 1993 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, M. & Stegun, I. A. 1968 Handbook of Mathematical Functions. Dover.
Amiet, R. K. 1976 High frequency thin-airfoil theory for subsonic flow. AIAA J. 14, 1076– 1082.Google Scholar
Amiet, R. K. 1986a Airfoil gust response and the sound produced by airfoil–vortex interaction. J. Sound Vib. 107, 487– 506.Google Scholar
Amiet, R. K. 1986b Intersection of a jet by an infinite span airfoil. J. Sound Vib. 111, 499– 503.Google Scholar
Dowling, A. P. & Ffowcs Williams, J. E. 1983 Sound and Sources of Sound. Ellis Horwood.
Ffowcs Williams, J. E. & Guo, Y. P. 1988 Sound generated from the interruption of a steady flow by a supersonically moving aerofoil. J. Fluid Mech. 195, 113– 135.Google Scholar
Guo, Y. P. 1990 Sound generation by a supersonic aerofoil cutting through a steady jet flow J. Fluid Mech. 216, 193– 212.Google Scholar
Howe, M. 1989 On sound generated when a vortex is chopped by a circular airfoil. J. Sound Vib. 128, 487– 503.Google Scholar
Jones, D. S. 1966 Generalised Functions. McGraw-Hill.
Koiter, W. T. 1954 Approximate solution of Wiener–Hopf type integral equations with applications, I-III. Koninkl. Ned. Akad. Wetenschap. Proc. B 57, 558– 579.Google Scholar
Martinez, R. & Widnall, S. E. 1983 Aerodynamic theory for wing with side edge passing subsonically through a gust. AIAA J. 21, 808– 815.Google Scholar
Miles, J. W. 1951 The oscillating rectangular airfoil at supersonic speeds. Q. Appl. Maths 9, 47– 65.Google Scholar
Noble, B. 1958 Methods Based on the Wiener–Hopf Technique. Pergamon.
Peake, N. 1992 Unsteady transonic flow past a quarter-plane. J. Fluid Mech. 244, 377– 404.Google Scholar
Simonich, J. C., McCormick, D. C. & Lavich, P. L. 1989 Interaction noise mechanisms for advanced propellers: experimental results. AIAA Paper 89-1093.
Stewartson, K. 1950 On the linearized potential theory of unsteady supersonic motion. Q. J.Mech. Appl. Maths 3, 182– 199.Google Scholar
Vaczy, C. M. & McCormick, D. C. 1987 A study of the leading edge vortex and tip vortex on prop-fan blades. J. Turbomachinery 109, 325– 331.Google Scholar