Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T07:23:35.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On entry-flow effects in bifurcating, blocked or constricted tubes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2006

F. T. Smith
Affiliation:
Mathematics Department, Imperial College, London

Abstract

For practically uniform entry conditions, the features of the steady laminar flow produced by a particular small distortion of the walls of a channel or pipe are shown to alter first from those of the corresponding external situation when the distortion is in an ‘adjustment zone’, sited a large distance O(Rl) from the inlet; R ([Gt ] 1) and l signify respectively a typical Reynolds number and length scale of the incompressible fluid motion. The planar channel flow there develops an extended triple-deck structure, with an unknown inviscid core motion bounded by two-tiered boundary layers near the walls. In three-dimensional pipe flow, where a similar structure occurs, the induced secondary motion has a jet-like nature close to the wall. The size and position of the indentation govern the flow properties within this adjustment regime and both can lead to large-scale effects being propagated. The most substantial effects occur if an indentation, interior blockage or bifurcation is sited just downstream of the adjustment stage in a channel. In a pipe, however, such a siting induces much less upstream influence, and instead the most significant long-scale disturbances are generated when the pipe is constricted asymmetrically over a small length. Vortex motion can then be provoked far beyond the constriction, the sense of rotation changing as the fluid moves further downstream, while upstream source-like secondary flow is found.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1976 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, S. N. & Stewartson, K. 1970 Trailing-edge stall J. Fluid Mech. 42, 561584.Google Scholar
Jones, D. S. 1952 A simplifying technique in the solution of a class of diffraction problems Quart. J. Math. 3, 189196.Google Scholar
Mihklin, S. G. 1964 Integral Equations. Pergamon.
Noble, B. 1958 The Wiener—Hopf Technique. Pergamon.
Singh, M. P. 1974 Entry flow in a curved pipe J. Fluid Mech. 65, 517539.Google Scholar
Smith, F. T. 1973 Laminar flow over a small hump on a flat plate J. Fluid Mech. 57, 803824.Google Scholar
Smith, F. T. 1976a Fluid flow into a curved pipe.Proc. Roy. Soc A 351, 7187.
Smith, F. T. 1976b Flow through constricted or dilated pipes and channels Quart. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 29, 343364.Google Scholar
Smith, F. T. 1976c Pipeflows distorted by nonsymmetric indentation or branching Mathematika, 23, 6283.Google Scholar
Smith, F. T. 1977 Upstream interactions in channel flows. J. Fluid Mech. (to appear).Google Scholar
Stewartson, K. 1974 Multistructured boundary layers on flat plates and related bodies Adv. in Appl. Mech. 14, 145239.Google Scholar
Stewartson, K. & Williams, P. G. 1969 Self-induced separation.Proc. Roy. Soc A 312, 181207.
Thwaites, B. (ed.) 1960 Incompressible Aerodynamics. Oxford University Press .
Van Dyke, M. 1970 Entry flow in a channel J. Fluid Mech. 44, 813823.Google Scholar
Wilson, S. D. R. 1971 Entry flow in a channel. Part 2 J. Fluid Mech. 46, 787799.Google Scholar