Hostname: page-component-669899f699-tpknm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-28T23:03:04.692Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the connection between thin vortex layers and vortex sheets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

G. R. Baker  and
M. J. Shelley
G. R. Baker
Affiliation:
Program in Applied and Computational Mathematics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA Department of Mathematics, Ohio State University, Columbus OH 43210, USA.
M. J. Shelley
Affiliation:
Program in Applied and Computational Mathematics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA Department of Mathematics, University of Chicago, Chicago IL 60637, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The equations for the two-dimensional motion of a layer of uniform vorticity in an incompressible, inviscid fluid are examined in the limit of small thickness. Under the right circumstances, the limit is a vortex sheet whose strength is the vorticity multiplied by the local thickness of the layer. However, vortex sheets can develop singularities in finite time, and their subsequent nature is an open question. Vortex layers, on the other hand, have motions for all time, though they may develop singularities on their boundaries. Fortunately, a material curve within the layer does exist for all time. Under certain assumptions, its limiting motion is again the vortex sheet, and thus its behaviour may indicate the nature and possible existence of the vortex sheet after the singularity time. Similar asymptotic results are obtained also for the limiting behaviour of the centre curve as defined by Moore (1978). By examining the behaviour of a sequence of layers, some physical understanding of the formation of the curvature singularity for a vortex sheet is gained. A strain flow, induced partly by the periodic extension of the sheet, causes vorticity to be advected to a certain point on the sheet rapidly enough to form the singularity. A vortex layer, however, simply bulges outwards as a consequence of incompressibility and subsequently forms a core with trailing arms that wrap around it. The evidence indicates that no singularities form on the boundary curves of the layer. Beyond the singularity time of the vortex sheet, the limiting behaviour of the vortex layers is non-uniform. Away from the vortex core, the layers converge to a smooth curve which has the appearance of a doubly branched spiral. While the circulation around the core vanishes, approximations to the vortex sheet strength become unbounded, indicating a complex, local structure whose precise nature remains undetermined.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 215 , June 1990 , pp. 161 - 194
Copyright
© 1990 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Baker, G. R. & Shelley, M. J. 1986 Boundary integral techniques for multi-connected domains. J. Comput. Phys. 64, 112.Google Scholar
Bell, J. B., Colella, P. & Glaz, H. M. 1988 A second-order projection method for the incompressible Navier—Stokes equations. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Preprint UCRL-98225.
Broadbent, E. G. & Moore, D. W. 1985 Waves of extreme form on a layer of uniform vorticity. Phys. Fluids 28, 1561.Google Scholar
Caflisch, R. & Orellana, O. 1986a Long time existence for a slightly perturbed vortex sheet. Commun. Pure Appl. Maths 39, 807.Google Scholar
Caflisch, R. & Orellana, O. 1989 Singularity formation and ill-posedness for vortex sheets. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 20, 293.Google Scholar
Diperna, R. & Majda, A. 1987 Concentrations in regularizations for 2-d incompressible flow. Commun. Pure Appl. Maths 40, 301.Google Scholar
Dritschel, D. G. 1988 The repeated filamentation of two-dimensional vorticity interfaces. J. Fluid Mech. 194, 511.Google Scholar
Dritschel, D. G. 1990 The stability of elliptical vortices in an external straining flow. J. Fluid Mech. 210, 223.Google Scholar
Duchon, R. & Robert, R. 1989 Global vortex sheet solutions to Euler equations in the plane. Commun. Partial Diff. Equn (to appear).Google Scholar
Higdon, J. J. L. & Pozrikidis, C. 1985 The self-induced motion of vortex sheets. J. Fluid Mech. 150, 203.Google Scholar
Hyman, J. M. & Naughton, M. J. 1984 Static rezone methods for tensor-product grids. In Proc. SIAM—AMS Conf. on Large Scale Computation in Fluid Mechanics. Philadelphia: SIAM.
Kida, S. 1981 Motion of an elliptic vortex in a uniform shear flow. J. Phys. Soc. Japan 50, 3517.Google Scholar
Krasny, R. 1986a A stud of singularity formation in a vortex sheet by the point-vortex approximation. J. Fluid Mech. 167, 65.Google Scholar
Krasny, R. 1986b Desingularization of periodic vortex sheet roll-up. J. Comput. Phys. 65, 292.Google Scholar
Love, A. E. H. 1883 On the stability of certain vortex motions. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 25, 18.Google Scholar
Majda, A. 1987 Vortex dynamics: Numerical analysis, scientific computing, and mathematical theory. In Proc. First Intl Conf. on Industrial and Applied Maths, Paris.
McGrath, F. J. 1967 Nonstationary plane flow of viscous and ideal fluids. Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal. 27, 329.Google Scholar
Meiron, D. I., Baker, G. R. & Orszag, S. A. 1982 Analytic structure of vortex sheet dynamics. Part 1. Kelvin—Helmholtz instability. J. Fluid Mech. 114, 283 (referred to as MBO).Google Scholar
Moore, D. W. 1976 The stability of an evolving vortex sheet. Mathematika 23, 35.Google Scholar
Moore, D. W. 1978 The equation of motion of a vortex layer of small thickness. Stud. Appl. Maths 58, 119.Google Scholar
Moore, D. W. 1979 The spontaneous appearance of a singularity in the shape of an evolving vortex sheet. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 365, 105.Google Scholar
Moore, D. W. 1985 Numerical and analytical aspects of Helmholtz instability. In Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Proc. XVI IUTAM (ed. Niodson & Olhoff), p. 263. North-Holland.
Moore, D. W. & Griffith-Jones, R. 1974 The stability of an expanding circular vortex sheet. Mathematika 21, 128.Google Scholar
Moore, D. W. & Saffman, P. G. 1973 Axial flow in laminar trailing vortices. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 346, 491.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, R. T. & Widnall, S. E. 1981 The structure of organized vortices in a free shear layer. J. Fluid Mech. 102, 301.Google Scholar
Pozrikidis, C. & Higdon, J. J. L. 1985 Nonlinear Kelvin—Helmholtz instability of a finite vortex layer. J. Fluid Mech. 157, 225.Google Scholar
Pullin, D. I. 1981 The nonlinear behaviour of a constant vorticity layer at a wall. J. Fluid Mech. 108, 401.Google Scholar
Pullin, D. I. & Jacobs, P. A. 1986 Inviscid evolution of stretched vortex arrays. J. Fluid Mech. 171, 377.Google Scholar
Pullin, D. I. & Phillips, W. R. C. 1981 On a generalization of Kaden's problem. J. Fluid Mech. 104, 45.Google Scholar
Rayleigh, Lord 1880 On the stability or instability of certain fluid motions. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 11, 57.Google Scholar
Saffman, P. G. & Baker, G. R. 1979 Vortex interactions. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 11, 95.Google Scholar
Shelley, M. J. 1990 A study of singularity formation in vortex sheet motion by a spectrally accurate vortex method. J. Fluid Mech. (submitted).Google Scholar
Shelley, M. J. & Baker, G. R. 1988 Order conserving approximations to derivatives of periodic functions using iterated splines. SIAM J. Num. Anal. 25, 1442.Google Scholar
Smith, J. H. B. 1986 Vortex flows in aerodynamics. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 18, 221.Google Scholar
Sulem, C., Sulem, P. L., Bardos, C. & Frisch, U. 1981 Finite time analyticity for the two and three dimensional Kelvin—Helmholtz instability. Commun. Math. Phys. 80, 485.Google Scholar
Sulem, C., Sulem, P. L. & Frisch, H. 1983 Tracing complex singularities with spectral methods. J. Comput. Phys. 50, 138.Google Scholar
Van Dyke, M. 1975 Perturbation Methods in Fluid Mechanics. Parabolic.
Yudovich, V. I. 1963 Non-stationary flow of an ideal incompressible liquid. Zh. Vych. Mat. 3, 1032.Google Scholar
Zabusky, N. J., Hughes, M. H. & Roberts, K. V. 1979 Contour dynamics for the Euler equations in two dimensions. J. Comput. Phys. 30, 96.Google Scholar