Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T13:25:55.835Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the propagation of shock waves through regions of non-uniform area or flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2006

G. B. Whitham
Affiliation:
Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University

Abstract

This paper refers to the work of Moeckel (1952) on the interaction of an oblique shock wave with a shear layer in steady supersonic flow and the work of Chester (1955) and Chisnell (1957) on the propagation of a shock wave down a non-uniform tube. It is shown that their basic results can be obtained by the application of the following simple rule. The relevant equations of motion are first written in characteristic form. Then the rule is to apply the differential relation which must be satisfied by the flow quantities along a characteristic to the flow quantities just behind the shock wave. Together with the shock relations this rule determines the motion of the shock wave. The accuracy of the results for a wide range of problems and for all shock strengths is truly surprising.

The results are exactly the same as were found by the authors cited above. The derivation given here is simpler to perfom (although the original methods were by no means involved) and of somewhat wider application, but the main reason for presenting this discussion is to try to throw further light on these remarkable results.

In discussing the underlying reasons for this rule, it is convenient to use the propagation in a non-uniform tube as a typical example, but applications to a number of problems are given later. A list of some of these appears at the beginning of the introductory section.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Butler, D. S. 1954 Armament Research and Development Establishment, Rep. no. 54/54.
Chester, W. 1954 Phil. Mag. (7), 45, 1293.
Chisnell, R. F. 1955 Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 223, 350.
Chisnell, R. F. 1957 J. Fluid Mech. 2, 286.
Eggars, A. J., Savin, R. C., & Syvertson, C. A. 1955 J. Aero. Sci. 22, 231.
Ferri, A. 1946 Nat. Adv. Comm. Aero., Wash., Rep. no. 841.
Friedrichs, K. O. 1955 Non-linear wave motion in magnetohydrodynamics, unpublished Los Alamos Report.Google Scholar
Guderley, G. 1942 Luftfarhtforschung 19, 302.
Howarth, L. 1953 Modern Developments in Fluid Dynamics. High Speed Flow. Oxford University Press.
Lighthill, M. J., & Whitham, G. B. 1955 Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 229, 281.
Lundquist, S. 1952 Studies in magnetohydrodynamics, Arkiv für Physik 5, no. 15.Google Scholar
Mahony, J. J. 1955 J. Aero. Sci. 22, 673.
Moeckel, W. E. 1952 Nat. Adv. Comm. Aero., Wash., Tech. Note no. 2725.
Payne, R. B. 1957 J. Fluid Mech. 2, 185.