Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-20T18:55:58.793Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two-dimensional secondary instabilities in a strongly stratified shear layer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

Chantal Staquet
Chantal Staquet
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Physique (CNRS, URA 1325), Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, 46 allée d'Italie, 69364 Lyon Cédex 07, France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In a stably stratified shear layer, thin vorticity layers (‘baroclinic layers’) are produced by buoyancy effects and strain in between the Kelvin–Helmholtz vortices. A two-dimensional numerical study is conducted, in order to investigate the stability of these layers. Besides the secondary Kelvin–Helmholtz instability, expected but never observed previously in two-dimensional numerical simulations, a new instability is also found.

The influence of the Reynolds number (Re) upon the dynamics of the baroclinic layers is first studied. The layers reach an equilibrium state, whose features have been described theoretically by Corcos & Sherman (1976). An excellent agreement between those predictions and the results of the numerical simulations is obtained. The baroclinic layers are found to remain stable almost up to the time the equilibrium state is reached, though the local Richardson number can reach values as low as 0.05 at the stagnation point. On the basis of the work of Dritschel et al. (1991), we show that the stability of the layer at this location is controlled by the outer strain field induced by the large-scale Kelvin–Helmholtz vortices. Numerical values of the strain rate as small as 3% of the maximum vorticity of the layer are shown to stabilize the stagnation point region.

When non-pairing flows are considered, we find that only for Re ≤ 2000 does a secondary instability eventually amplify in the layer. (Re is based upon half the initial vorticity thickness and half the velocity difference at the horizontally oriented boundaries.) This secondary instability is not of the Kelvin–Helmholtz type. It develops in the neighbourhood of convectively unstable regions of the primary Kelvin–Helmholtz vortex, apparently once a strong jet has formed there, and moves along the baroclinic layer while amplifying. It next perturbs the layer around the stagnation point and a secondary instability, now of the Kelvin–Helmholtz type, is found to develop there.

We next examine the influence of a pairing upon the flow behaviour. We show that this event promotes the occurrence of a secondary Kelvin–Helmholtz instability, which occurs for Re ≥ 400. Moreover, at high Reynolds number (≥ 2000), secondary Kelvin–Helmholtz instabilities develop successively in the baroclinic layer, at smaller and smaller scales, thereby transferring energy towards dissipative scales through a mechanism eventually leading to turbulence. Because the vorticity of such a two-dimensional stratified flow is no longer conserved following a fluid particle, an analogy with three-dimensional turbulence can be drawn.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 296 , 10 August 1995 , pp. 73 - 126
Copyright
© 1995 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altman, D. B. 1988 Critical layers in accelerating two-layer flows. J. Fluid Mech. 197, 429–451.Google Scholar
Atsavapranee, P. 1995 The dynamics of a stratified mixing layer with cross shear. PhD thesis, University of California. San Diego.
Batchelor, G. K. 1967 An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge University Press.
Bayly, B. J., Orszag, S. A. & Herbert, T. 1988 Instability mechanisms in shear-flow transition. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 20, 359–391.Google Scholar
Bernal, L. P. & Roshko, A. 1986 Streamwise vortex structures in plane mixing layers. J. Fluid Mech. 170, 499–525.Google Scholar
Brachet, M.-E. 1990 Géométrie des structures à petite échelle dans le vortex de Taylor—Green. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 311 (II), 775–780.Google Scholar
Browand, F. K., Guyomar, D. & Yoon, S.-C. 1987 The behavior of a turbulent front in a stratified fluid: experiments with an oscillating grid. J. Geophys. Res. 92 (C5), 5329–5341.Google Scholar
Browand, F. K. & Winant, C. D. 1973 Laboratory observations of shear-layer instability in a stratified fluid. Boundary-Layer Met. 5, 67–77.Google Scholar
Canuto, C., Hussaini, M. Y., Quarteroni, A. & Zang, T. A. 1988 Spectral Methods in Fluid Dynamics. Springer.
Caulfield, C. P. & Peltier, W. R. 1994 Three-dimensionalization of the stratified mixing layer. Phys. Fluids 6, 3803–3805.Google Scholar
Comte, P., Lesieur, M. & Lamballais, E. 1992 Large and small-scale stirring of vorticity and a passive scalar in a 3D temporal mixing layer. Phys. Fluids A 4, 2761–2778.Google Scholar
Corcos, G. M. & Sherman, F. S. 1976 Vorticity concentration and the dynamics of unstable free shear layers. J. Fluid Mech. 73, 241–264.Google Scholar
Corcos, G. M. & Sherman, F. S. 1984 The mixing layer: deterministic models of a turbulent flow. Part 1. Introduction and the two-dimensional flow. J. Fluid Mech. 139, 29–65.Google Scholar
Davis, P. A. & Peltier, W. R. 1979 Some characteristics of the Kelvin—Helmholtz and resonant overreflection modes of shear flow instability and of their interaction through vortex pairing. J. Atmos. Sci. 36, 2394–2412.Google Scholar
Delisi, D. P. 1973 An experimental study of finite amplitude waves in a stratified wind tunnel. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley.
Drazin, P. G. & Reid, W. H. 1981 Hydrodynamic Stability. Cambridge University Press.
Dritschel, D. G., Haynes, P. H., Juckes, M. N. & Shepherd, T. G. 1991 The stability of a two-dimensional vorticity filament under uniform strain. J. Fluid Mech. 230, 647–665.Google Scholar
Dutton, J. A. & Panofski, H. A. 1970 Clear air turbulence: a mystery may be unfolding. Science 167, 937–944.Google Scholar
Garrett, C. 1993 A stirring tale of mixing. Nature 364, 670–671.Google Scholar
Gerz, T. & Schumann, U. 1991 Direct simulations of homogeneous turbulence and gravity waves in sheared and unsheared stratified flows. In Turbulent Shear Flow 7 (ed. F. Durst, et al.), pp. 27–45. Springer.
Gossard, E. E., Richter, J. H. & Atlas, D. 1970 Internal waves in the atmosphere from high-resolution radar measurements. J. Geophys. Res. 75, 3523–3535.Google Scholar
Gregg, M. 1987 Diapycnal mixing in the thermocline: a review. J. Geophys. Res. 92 (C5), 5249–5286.Google Scholar
Haberman, R. 1973 Wave-induced distortions of a slightly stratified shear layer: a nonlinear critical layer effect. J. Fluid Mech. 58, 727–735.Google Scholar
Haury, L. R., Briscoe, M. G. & Orr, M. H. 1979 Tidally generated internal wave packets in Massachusetts Bay. Nature 278, 312–317.Google Scholar
Hazel, P. 1972 Numerical studies of the stability of inviscid stratified shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 51, 39–61.Google Scholar
Herring, J. R. & Metais, O. 1989 Numerical experiments in forced stably stratified turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 202, 97–115.Google Scholar
Ho, C. M. & Huerre, P. 1984 Perturbed free shear layers. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 16, 365–424.Google Scholar
Hopfinger, E. J. 1987 Turbulence in stratified fluids: a review. J. Geophys. Res. 92 (C5), 5287–5303.Google Scholar
Howard, L. N. 1961 Note on a paper of John W. Miles. J. Fluid Mech. 10, 509–512.Google Scholar
Kelly, R. E. 1967 On the stability of an inviscid shear layer which is periodic in space and time. J. Fluid Mech. 27, 657–689.Google Scholar
Klaassen, G. P. & Peltier, W. R. 1985a The evolution of finite amplitude Kelvin—Helmholtz billows in two spatial dimensions. J. Atmos. Sci. 42, 1321–1339.Google Scholar
Klaassen, G. P. & Peltier, W. R. 1985a The effect of Prandtl number on the evolution and stability of Kelvin—Helmholtz billows. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 32, 23–60.Google Scholar
Klaassen, G. P. & Peltier, W. R. 1985b The onset of turbulence in finite-amplitude Kelvin—Helmholtz billows. J. Fluid Mech. 155, 1–35.Google Scholar
Klaassen, G. P. & Peltier, W. R. 1989 The role of transverse secondary instabilities in the evolution of free shear layers. J. Fluid Mech. 202, 367–402.Google Scholar
Klaassen, G. P. & Peltier, W. R. 1991 The influence of stratification on secondary instability in free shear layers. J. Fluid Mech. 227, 71–106.Google Scholar
Knio, O. M. & Ghoniem, A. F. 1992 The three-dimensional structure of periodic vorticity layers under non-symmetric conditions. J. Fluid Mech. 243, 353–392.Google Scholar
Koop, C. G. & Browand, F. K. 1979 Instability and turbulence in a stratified fluid with shear. J. Fluid Mech. 93, 135–159.Google Scholar
Kraichnan, R. H. & Montgomery, D. 1980 Two-dimensional turbulence. Rep. Prog. Phys. 43, 547–617.Google Scholar
Lasheras, J. C., Cho, J. S. & Maxworthy, T. 1986 On the origin and evolution of streamwise vortical structures in a plane, free shear layer. J. Fluid Mech. 172, 231–238.Google Scholar
Lawrence, G. A., Browand, F. K. & Redekopp, L. G. 1991 The stability of a sheared density interface. Phys. Fluids A 3, 2360–2370.Google Scholar
Lesieur, M. 1990 Turbulence in Fluids. Kluwer.
Lienhard, J. H. & Van Atta, C. W. 1990 The decay of turbulence in thermally stratified flow. J. Fluid Mech. 210, 57–112.Google Scholar
Lin, J.-T. & Pao, Y.-H. 1979 Wakes in stratified fluids. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 11, 317–338.Google Scholar
Lin, S. J. & Corcos, G. M. 1984 The mixing layer: deterministic models of a turbulent flow. Part 3. The effect of plain strain on the dynamics of streamwise vortices. J. Fluid Mech. 141, 139–178.Google Scholar
Lombard, P. N., Stretch, D. D. & Riley, J. J. 1990 Energetics of a stably stratified mixing layer. Proc. the Ninth Symp. on Turbulence and Diffusion, Roskilde, Denmark, 30 April–3 May. Am. Met. Soc.
Maslowe, S. A. 1972 The generation of clear air turbulence by nonlinear waves. Stud. Appl. Maths 51, 1–16.Google Scholar
Maslowe, S. A. 1986 Critical layers in shear flows. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 18, 405–432.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, R. W., Orszag, S. A., Brachet, M., Menon, S. & Riley, J. J. 1987 Secondary instability of a temporally growing mixing layer. J. Fluid Mech. 184, 207–243.Google Scholar
Miles, J. W. 1961 On the stability of heterogeneous shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 10, 496–508.Google Scholar
Nygaard, K. J. & Glezer, A. 1991 Evolution of streamwise vortices and the generation of small-scale motion in a plane mixing layer. J. Fluid Mech. 231, 257–301.Google Scholar
Orszag, S. A. 1971 Numerical simulation of incompressible flows within simple boundaries. I. Galerkin (spectral) representation. Stud. Appl. Maths 50, 293–327.Google Scholar
Patnaik, P. C., Sherman, F. S. & Corcs, G. M. 1976 A numerical simulation of Kelvin—Helmholtz waves of finite amplitude. J. Fluid Mech. 73, 215–240.Google Scholar
Peltier, W. R., Hallé, J. & Clark, T. L. 1978 The evolution of finite amplitude Kelvin—Helmholtz billows. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 10, 53–87.Google Scholar
Pumir, A. & Siggia, E. D. 1992 Development of singular solutions to the axisymmetric Euler equations. Phys. Fluids A 4, 1472–1491.Google Scholar
Rogers, M. M. & Moser, R. D. 1992 The three-dimensional evolution of a plane mixing layer: The Kelvin—Helmholtz rollup. J. Fluid Mech. 243, 183–226.Google Scholar
Schowalter, D. G., Van Atta, C. W. & Lasheras, J. C. 1994 Baroclinic generation of streamwise vorticity in a stratified shear layer. Meccanica (Special Issue on Vortex Dynamics, ed. E. J. Hopfinger & P. Orlandi), 20 (4), 361–372.Google Scholar
Scotti, R. S. & Gorcos, G. M. 1972 An experiment on the stability of small disturbances in a stratified shear layer. J. Fluid Mech. 52, 499–528.Google Scholar
Staquet, C. 1991 Influence of a shear on a stably-stratified flow. In Organized Structures and Turbulence in Fluid Mechanics (ed. O. Métais & M. Lesieur), pp. 469–487. Kluwer.
Staquet, C. 1994 A numerical study of vorticity layers in a two-dimensional stratified shear flow. Meccanica (Special Issue on Vortex Dynamics, ed. E. J. Hopfinger & P. Orlandi), 20 (4), 489–506.Google Scholar
Staquet, C. & Riley, J. J. 1989 A numerical study of a stably-stratified mixing layer. In Turbulent Shear Flows 6 (ed. J.-C. André et al.), pp. 381–397. Springer.
Stuart, J. T. 1967 On finite amplitude oscillations in laminar mixing layers. J. Fluid Mech. 29, 417–440.Google Scholar
Thorpe, S. A. 1968 A method of producing a shear flow in a stratified fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 32, 693–704.Google Scholar
Thorpe, S. A. 1971 Experiments on the instability of stratified shear flows: miscible fluids. J. Fluid Mech. 46, 299–319.Google Scholar
Thorpe, S. A. 1973 Experiments on instability and turbulence in a stratified shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 61, 731–751.Google Scholar
Thorpe, S. A. 1985 Laboratory observations of secondary structures in Kelvin—Helmholtz billows and consequences for ocean mixing. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 34, 175–199.Google Scholar
Thorpe, S. A. 1987 Transitional phenomena on turbulence in stratified fluids. J. Geophys. Res. 92 (C5), 5231–5248.Google Scholar
Troitskaya, Y. I. 1991 The viscous diffusion nonlinear critical layer in a stratified shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 233, 25–48.Google Scholar
Winant, C. D. & Browand, F. K. 1974 Vortex pairing: the mechanism of turbulent mixing layer growth at moderate Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 63, 237–255.Google Scholar
Woods, J. D. 1969 On Richardson's number as a criterion for laminar-turbulent-laminar transition in the ocean and atmosphere. Radio Sci. 4, 1289–1298.Google Scholar
Yoshida, S. 1977 On a mechanism for breaking of interfacial waves. Coastal Engng Japan 20, 7–15.Google Scholar
Yoshida, S., Caulfield, C. P. & Peltier, W. R. 1994 Secondary instability and three-dimensionalization in a laboratory accelerating shear layer with varying density differences. Preprints of 4th Intl Symp. on Stratified Flows, Grenoble, June 28–July 2 (ed. E. J. Hopfinger, B. Voisin & G. Chavand).