Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T01:10:04.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dynamic roughness perturbation of a turbulent boundary layer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2011

I. Jacobi  and
B. J. McKeon
I. Jacobi*
Affiliation:
Graduate Aerospace Laboratories, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
B. J. McKeon
Affiliation:
Graduate Aerospace Laboratories, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
*
†Email address for correspondence: jacobi@caltech.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The zero-pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layer over a flat plate was perturbed by a temporally oscillating, spatial impulse of roughness, and the downstream response of the flow field was interrogated by hot-wire anemometry and particle-image velocimetry. The key features common to impulsively perturbed boundary layers, as identified in Jacobi & McKeon (J. Fluid Mech., 2011), were investigated, and the unique contributions of the dynamic perturbation were isolated by contrast with an appropriately matched static impulse of roughness. In addition, the dynamic perturbation was decomposed into separable large-scale and small-scale structural effects, which in turn were associated with the organized wave and roughness impulse aspects of the perturbation. A phase-locked velocity decomposition of the entire downstream flow field revealed strongly coherent modes of fluctuating velocity, with distinct mode shapes for the streamwise and wall-normal velocity components. Following the analysis of McKeon & Sharma (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 658, 2010, pp. 336–382), the roughness perturbation was treated as a forcing of the Navier–Stokes equation and a linearized analysis employing a modified Orr–Sommerfeld operator was performed. The experimentally ascertained wavespeed of the input disturbance was used to solve for the most amplified singular mode of the Orr–Sommerfeld resolvent. These calculated modes were then compared with the streamwise and wall-normal velocity fluctuations. The discrepancies between the calculated Orr–Sommerfeld resolvent modes and those experimentally observed by phase-locked averaging of the velocity field were postulated to result from the violation of the parallel flow assumption of Orr–Sommerfeld analysis, as well as certain non-equilibrium effects of the roughness. Additionally, some difficulties previously observed using a quasi-laminar eigenmode analysis were also observed under the resolvent approach; however, the resolvent analysis was shown to provide reasonably accurate predictions of velocity fluctuations for the forced Orr–Sommerfeld problem over a portion of the boundary layer, with potential applications to designing efficient flow control strategies. The combined experimental and analytical effort provides a new opportunity to examine the non-equilibrium and forcing effects in a dynamically perturbed flow.

JFM classification

Turbulent Flows: Turbulent boundary layers
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 688 , 10 December 2011 , pp. 258 - 296
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Andreopoulos, J. & Wood, D. H. 1982 The response of a turbulent boundary layer to a short length of surface roughness. J. Fluid Mech. 118, 143–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Antonia, R. A. & Luxton, R. E. 1971 The response of a turbulent boundary layer to a step change in surface roughness Part 1. Smooth to rough. J. Fluid Mech. 48 (4), 721–761.Google Scholar
3. Antonia, R. A. & Luxton, R. E. 1972 The response of a turbulent boundary layer to a step change in surface roughness Part 2. Rough-to-smooth. J. Fluid Mech. 53 (4), 737–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Boyd, J. P. 2000 Chebyshev and Fourier Spectral Methods. Dover.Google Scholar
5. Builtjes, P. J. H. 1975 Determination of the Eulerian longitudinal integral length scale in a turbulent boundary layer. Appl. Sci. Res. 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Danabasoglu, G. & Biringen, S. 1989 A Chebyshev matrix method for spatial modes of the Orr–Sommerfeld equation. NASA Tech. Rep. CR 4247.Google Scholar
7. Grosch, C. E. & Salwen, H. 1978 The continuous spectrum of the Orr–Sommerfeld equation. Part 1. The spectrum and the eigenfunctions. J. Fluid Mech. 33–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Hellström, L. H. O. & Smits, A. J. 2011 Visualizing the very-large-scale motions in turbulent pipe flow. Phys. Fluids 23; 011703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Hinze, J. O. 1975 Turbulence, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
10. Hussain, A. K. M. F. & Reynolds, W. C. 1970 The mechanics of an organized wave in turbulent shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 41, 241–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Hussain, A. K. M. F. & Reynolds, W. C. 1972 The mechanics of an organized wave in turbulent shear flow. Part 2. Experimental results. J. Fluid Mech. 54, 241–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Hutchins, N. & Marusic, I. 2007 Large-scale influences in near-wall turbulence. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 365, 647–664.Google ScholarPubMed
13. Jacobi, I. & McKeon, B. J. 2011 New perspectives on the impulsive roughness-perturbation of a turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech 677, 179–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Jordinson, R. 1970 The flat plate boundary layer. Part 1. Numerical integration of the Orr–Sommerfeld equation. J. Fluid Mech. 43, 801–811.Google Scholar
15. Kato, T. 1966 Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators. Springer.Google Scholar
16. Maslowe, S. A. 1986 Critical layers in shear flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 18, 405–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. McKeon, B. J. & Sharma, A. S. 2010 A critical layer model for turbulent pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. 658, 336–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Monty, J. P., Hutchins, N., Ng, H. C. H., Marusic, I. & Chong, M. S. 2009 A comparison of turbulent pipe, channel and boundary layer flows. J. Fluid Mech. 632, 431–442.Google Scholar
19. Morrison, J. F. 2010 Boundary layers under strong distortion: an experimentalist’s view. In Prediction of Turbulent Flows. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
20. Pearson, B. R., Elavarasan, R. & Antonia, R. A. 1997 Effect of a short roughness strip on a turbulent boundary layer. Appl. Sci. Res. 59 (1), 61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Reddy, S. C., Schmid, P. J. & Henningson, D. S. 1993 Pseudospectra of the Orr–Sommerfeld operator. SIAM J. Appl. Maths 53, 15–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Reynolds, W. C. & Hussain, A. K. M. F. 1972 The mechanics of an organized wave in turbulent shear flow. Part 3. Theoretical models and comparisons with experiments. J. Fluid Mech. 54, 263–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Schlichting, H. 1950 Amplitude distribution and energy balance of small disturbances in plate flow. NACA Tech. Rep. 1265.Google Scholar
24. Schlichting, H. 1968 Boundary-Layer Theory, 6th edn. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
25. Schmid, P. J. & Henningson, D. S. 2001 Stability and Transition in Shear Flows. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Schubauer, G. B. & Skramstad, H. K. 1943 Laminar-boundary-layer oscillations and transition on a flat plate. NACA Tech. Rep. 9595.Google Scholar
27. Schubauer, G. B. & Skramstad, H. K. 1947 Laminar boundary-layer oscillations and stability of laminar flow. J. Aeronaut. Sci. 14 (2), 69–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28. Smits, A. J. & Wood, D. H. 1985 The response of turbulent boundary layers to sudden perturbations. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 17, 321–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29. Smits, A. J., Young, S. T. B. & Bradshaw, P. 1979 The effect of short regions of high curvature on turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 94, 209–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30. Spalding, D. B. 1961 A single formula for the law of the wall. J. Appl. Mech. 28, 455.Google Scholar
31. Stewart, P. S., Waters, S. L., Billingham, J. & Jensen, O. E. 2009 Spatially localised growth within global instabilities of flexible channel flows. In Seventh IUTAM Symposium on Laminar–Turbulent Transition.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32. Townsend, A. A. 1961 Equilibrium layers and wall turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 11, 97–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33. Trefethen, L. N. & Embree, M. 2005 Spectra and Pseudospectra: The Behavior of Nonnormal Matrices and Operators. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34. Weideman, J. A. C. & Reddy, S. C. 2000 A MATLAB differentiation matrix suite. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 26 (4), 465–519.Google Scholar