Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T07:51:16.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The efficiency of pulsed-jet propulsion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2011

P. F. LINDEN*
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, University of Cambridge, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge CB3 0WA, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Nature is often an inspiration for scientists and especially so in fluid dynamics. We observe and admire the beauty of birds and fish as they move through the air and water, and wonder how these forms of locomotion evolved and whether they are optimised for efficiency. A common feature of this locomotion is that the thrust is generated by the flapping of a wing or fin, creating an unsteady flow. Other less readily observed animals such as salps or squid eject a pulsed jet, raising the question of whether there is an advantage of this unsteady forcing over a steady jet. This is the question addressed by Ruiz, Whittlesey & Dabiri (J. Fluid Mech., this issue, vol. 668, 2011, pp. 5–32) who have carried out detailed flow and power-consumption measurements with a self-propelled vehicle in water. The vehicle has a novel propulsion mechanism that allows a comparison of the efficiency of a pulsed and steady jet to be compared. They show that significant increases in efficiency are possible with the pulsed jet, even allowing for the additional power needed to create the pulsed flow. They also show that vortex rings are produced by the unsteady jet and that the additional entrainment of ambient fluid into the ring and the higher pressure at the front of the ring are the cause of this increased efficiency.

Type
Focus on Fluids
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

References

Dabiri, J. O. 2009 Optimal vortex formation as a unifying principle in biological propulsion. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 41, 1733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drucker, E. G. & Lauder, G. V. 1999 Locomotor forces on a swimming fish: three-dimensional vortex wake dynamics quantified using digital particle image velocimetry. J. Exp. Biol. 202, 23932412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drucker, E. G. & Lauder, G. V. 2001 Wake dynamics and fluid forces of turning maneuvers in sunfish. J. Expl Biol. 204, 431442.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gharib, M., Rambod, E. & Shariff, K. 1998 A universal timescale for vortex ring formation. J. Fluid Mech. 360, 121140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedenstrom, A. & Spedding, G. 2008 Beyond robins: aerodynamic analyses of animal flight. J. R. Soc. Interface 6, 595601.Google Scholar
Helmholtz, H. 1867 On integrals of the hydrodynamic equations, which express vortex-motion. Phil. Mag. 33, 485512.Google Scholar
Kruger, P. S. & Gharib, M. 2003 The significance of vortex ring formation to the impulse and thrust of a starting jet. Phys. Fluids. 15 (5), 12711281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linden, P. F. & Turner, J. S. 2001 The formation of optimal vortex rings and the efficiency of propulsion devices. J. Fluid Mech. 427, 6172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linden, P. F. & Turner, J. S. 2004 ‘Optimal’ vortex rings and aquatic propulsion. Proc. R. Soc. B 271, 4163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rogers, W. B. 1858 On the formation of rotating rings of air and liquids under certain conditions of discharge. Am. J. Sci. Arts 26, 247259.Google Scholar
Ruiz, L. A., Whittlesey, R. W. & Dabiri, J. O. 2011 Vortex-enhanced propulsion. J. Fluid Mech. 668, 532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shariff, K. & Leonard, A. 1992 Vortex rings. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 24, 235279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, W. A. 1867 On vortex atoms. Phil. Mag. 34, 1524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar