Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T23:18:43.471Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kinematics and statistics of dense, slow granular flow through vertical channels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 August 2008

ANANDA K. S. ,
SUDHESHNA MOKA  and
PRABHU R. NOTT
ANANDA K. S.
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India
SUDHESHNA MOKA
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India
PRABHU R. NOTT*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: prnott@chemeng.iisc.ernet.in.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We have investigated the flow of dry granular materials through vertical channels in the regime of dense slow flow using video imaging of the particles adjacent to a transparent wall. Using an image processing technique based on particle tracking velocimetry, the video movies were analysed to obtain the velocities of individual particles. Experiments were conducted in two- and three-dimensional channels. In the latter, glass beads and mustard seeds were used as model granular materials, and their translational velocities were measured. In the former, aluminium disks with a dark diametral stripe were used and their translational velocities and spin were measured. Experiments in the three-dimensional channels were conducted for a range of the channel width W, and for smooth and rough sidewalls. As in earlier studies, we find that shearing takes place predominantly in thin layers adjacent to the walls, while the rest of the material appears to move as a plug. However, there are large velocity fluctuations even in the plug, where the macroscopic deformation rate is negligibly small. The thickness of the shear layer, scaled by the particle diameter dp, increases weakly with W/dp. The experimental data for the velocity field are in good agreement with the Cosserat plasticity model proposed recently. We also measured the mean spin of the particles in the two-dimensional channel, and its deviation from half the vorticity. There is a clear, measurable deviation, which too is in qualitative agreement with the Cosserat plasticity model. The statistics of particle velocity and spin fluctuations in the two-dimensional channel were analysed by determining their probability distribution function, and their spatial and temporal correlation. They were all found to be broadly similar to previous observations for three-dimensional channels, but some differences are evident. The spatial correlation of the velocity fluctuations are much stronger in the two-dimensional channel, implying a pronounced solid-like motion superimposed over an uncorrelated fluid-like motion. The strong spatial correlation over large distances has led us to propose a mechanism for the production of velocity fluctuations in the absence of a macroscopic deformation rate.

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 610 , 10 September 2008 , pp. 69 - 97
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

Present address: KLA-Tencor Software India Pvt. Ltd, Chennai India.

‡

Present address: Tata Consultancy Services Ltd, New Delhi India.

References

REFERENCES

Albert, R., Pfeifer, M. A., Barabasi, A. & Schiffer, P. 1999 Slow drag in a granular medium. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 205–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ananda, K. S. 2006 Kinematics and statistics of dense granular flows. Master's thesis, Indian Institute of Science.Google Scholar
Becker, M. & Hauger, W. 1982 Granular material – an experimental realization of a plastic Cosserat continuum? In Proc. Intl. Symp. Mechanics of Inelastic Media and Structures, pp. 23–39. Warszawa–Poznan.Google Scholar
Bi, W., Delannay, R., Richard, P. & Valance, A. 2006 Experimental study of two-dimensional, monodisperse, frictional-collisional granular flows down an inclined chute. Phys. Fluids 18, 123302.Google Scholar
Brennen, C. & Pearce, J. C. 1978 Granular material flow in two dimensional hoppers. Trans. ASME J. Appl. Mech. 45, 43–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budny, T. J. 1979 Stick-slip friction as a method of powder flow characterization. Powder Technol. 23, 197–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, X., Lechman, J. B., Fernandez-Barbero, A., Grest, G. S., Jaeger, H. M., Karczmar, G. S., Möbius, M. E. & Nagel, S. R. 2006 Three-dimensional shear in granular flow. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 038001.Google Scholar
Cleaver, J. A. S. & Nedderman, R. M. 1993 Theoretical prediction of stress and velocity profiles in conical hoppers. Chem. Engng Sci. 48, 3693–3702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cosserat, E. & Cosserat, F. 1909 Theorie des Corps Deformables. A. Hermann, Paris.Google Scholar
Crocker, J. C. & Grier, D. G. 1996 Methods of digital video microscopy for colloidal studies. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 179, 298–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eringen, A. C. 1968 Theory of micropolar elasticity. In Fracture, vol. 1 (ed. Liebowitz, H.). Academic.Google Scholar
Fenistein, D. & van Hecke, M. 2003 Universal and wide shear zones in granular bulk flow. Nature 425, 256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenistein, D., van de Meent, J. W. & van Hecke, M. 2004 Universal and wide shear zones in granular bulk flow. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 094301.Google Scholar
Guezennec, Y. G. & Kiritsis, N. 1990 Statistical investigation of errors in particle image velocimetry. Exps. Fluids 10, 138–146.Google Scholar
Haitao, X., Reeves, A. P. & Louge, M. Y. 2004 Measurement errors in the mean and fluctuation velocities of spherical grains from a computer analysis of digital images. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 75, 811–818.Google Scholar
Howell, D. W., Behringer, R. P. & Veje, C. T. 1999 Fluctuations in granular media. Chaos 9, 559–572.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackson, R. 1983 Some mathematical and physical aspects of continuum models for the motion of the granular materials. In Theory of Dispersed Multiphase Flow (ed. Meyer, R. E.), pp. 291–337. Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenike, A. W. 1961 Gravity flow of bulk solids. Tech. Rep. Bulletin 108. University of Utah Engineering Experiment Station.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. T., Cundall, P. A. & Ishibashi, I. 1989 Micromechanical modeling of granular materials with the assistance of experiments and numerical simulations. In Powders and Grains (ed. Biarez, J. & Gourvès, R.), pp. 257–264. A. A. Balkema.Google Scholar
Krim, J. 1996 Friction at the atomic scale. Sci. Am. 275, 48–56.Google Scholar
Lippmann, H. 1995 Cosserat plasticity and plastic spin. Appl. Mech. Rev. 48, 753–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Losert, W., Bocquet, L., Lubensky, T. C. & Gollub, J. P. 2000 Particle dynamics in sheared granular matter. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1428–1431.Google Scholar
Lun, C. K. K. 1991 Kinetic theory for granular flow of dense, slightly inelastic, slightly rough spheres. J. Fluid Mech. 233, 539–559.Google Scholar
McCoy, B. J., Sandler, S. I. & Dahler, J. S. 1966 Transport properties of polyatomic fluids. IV. The kinetic theory of a dense gas of perfectly rough spheres. J. Chem. Phys 45, 3485–3512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michalowski, R. L. 1987 Flow of granular media through a plane parallel/converging bunker. Chem. Engng Sci. 42, 2587–2596.Google Scholar
Mohan, L. S., Nott, P. R. & Rao, K. K. 1997 Fully developed flow of coarse granular materials through a vertical channel. Chem. Engng Sci. 52, 913–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohan, L. S., Nott, P. R. & Rao, K. K. 1999 A frictional Cosserat model for the flow of granular materials through a vertical channel. Acta Mech. 138, 75–96.Google Scholar
Mohan, L. S., Rao, K. K. & Nott, P. R. 2002 A frictional Cosserat model for the slow shearing of granular materials. J. Fluid Mech. 457, 377–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moka, S. & Nott, P. R. 2005 Statistics of particle velocities in dense granular flows. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 068003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mueth, D. M., Debregeas, G. F., Karczmar, G. S., Eng, P. J., Nagel, S. R. & Jaeger, H. M. 2000 Signatures of granular microstructure in dense shear flows. Nature 406, 385–389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mühlhaus, H. B. 1989 Application of Cosserat theory in numerical solution of limit load problems. Ing. Arch. 59, 124–137.Google Scholar
Mühlhaus, H. B. & Vardoulakis, I. 1987 The thickness of shear bands in granular materials. Gèotechnique 37, 271–283.Google Scholar
Nasuno, S., Kudrolli, A., Bak, A. & Gollub, J. P. 1998 Time-resolved studies of stick–slip friction in sheared granular layers. Phys. Rev. E 58, 2161–2171.Google Scholar
Natarajan, V. V. R., Hunt, M. L. & Taylor, E. D. 1995 Local measurements of velocity fluctuations and diffusion coefficients for a granular material flow. J. Fluid Mech. 304, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nedderman, R. M. 1992 Statics and Kinematics of Granular Materials. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nedderman, R. M. & Laohakul, C. 1980 The thickness of shear zone of flowing granular materials. Powder Technol. 25, 91–100.Google Scholar
Orpe, A. V. & Kudrolli, A. 2007 Velocity correlations in dense granular flows observed with internal imaging. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 238001.Google Scholar
Prakash, J. R. & Rao, K. K. 1991 Steady compressible flow of cohesionless granular materials through a wedge-shaped bunker. J. Fluid Mech. 225, 21–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, O. 1885 On the dilatancy of media composed of rigid particles in contact. With experimental illustrations. Phil. Mag. 20, 469–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage, S. B. 1998 Analyses of slow high-concentration flows of granular materials. J. Fluid Mech. 377, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, A. N. & Wroth, C. P. 1968 Critical State Soil Mechanics. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Tardos, G. I., Khan, M. I. & Schaeffer, D. G. 1998 Forces on a slowly rotating, rough cylinder in a Couette device containing a dry, frictional powder. Phys. Fluids 10, 335–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tejchman, J. & Gudehus, G. 1993 Silo-music and silo-quake experiments and a numerical Cosserat approach. Powder Technol. 76, 201–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tejchman, J. & Wu, W. 1993 Numerical study of patterning of shear bands in a Cosserat continuum. Acta Mech. 99, 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vincent, L. & Soille, P. 1991 Watersheds in digital spaces: an efficient algorithm based on immersion simulations. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 13, 583–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar