Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-tdptf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-22T01:33:19.420Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Linear dynamics of wind waves in coupled turbulent air—water flow. Part 1. Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

S. E. Belcher
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Silver Street, Cambridge CB3 9EW, UK Present address: Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading RG6 2AU, UK
J. A. Harris
Affiliation:
Environmental Fluid Mechanics Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-4020, USA Present address: G.K. Williams Cooperative Research Centre, Department of Chemical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3052, Australia.
R. L. Street
Affiliation:
Environmental Fluid Mechanics Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-4020, USA

Abstract

When air blows over water the wind exerts a stress at the interface thereby inducing in the water a sheared turbulent drift current. We present scaling arguments showing that, if a wind suddenly starts blowing, then the sheared drift current grows in depth on a timescale that is larger than the wave period, but smaller than a timescale for wave growth. This argument suggests that the drift current can influence growth of waves of wavelength λ that travel parallel to the wind at speed c.

In narrow ‘inner’ regions either side of the interface, turbulence in the air and water flows is close to local equilibrium; whereas above and below, in ‘outer’ regions, the wave alters the turbulence through rapid distortion. The depth scale, la, of the inner region in the air flow increases with c/u*a (u*a is the unperturbed friction velocity in the wind). And so we classify the flow into different regimes according to the ratio la/λ. We show that different turbulence models are appropriate for the different flow regimes.

When (u*a + c)/UB(λ) [Lt ] 1 (UB(z) is the unperturbed wind speed) la is much smaller than λ. In this limit, asymptotic solutions are constructed for the fully coupled turbulent flows in the air and water, thereby extending previous analyses of flow over irrotational water waves. The solutions show that, as in calculations of flow over irrotational waves, the air flow is asymmetrically displaced around the wave by a non-separated sheltering effect, which tends to make the waves grow. But coupling the air flow perturbations to the turbulent flow in the water reduces the growth rate of the waves by a factor of about two. This reduction is caused by two distinct mechanisms. Firstly, wave growth is inhibited because the turbulent water flow is also asymmetrically displaced around the wave by non-separated sheltering. According to our model, this first effect is numerically small, but much larger erroneous values can be obtained if the rapid-distortion mechanism is not accounted for in the outer region of the water flow. (For example, we show that if the mixing-length model is used in the outer region all waves decay!) Secondly, non-separated sheltering in the air flow (and hence the wave growth rate) is reduced by the additional perturbations needed to satisfy the boundary condition that shear stress is continuous across the interface.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1994 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Al-Zanaidi, M. A. & Hui, W. H. 1984 Turbulent air flow over water waves – a numerical study. J. Fluid Mech. 148, 225246.Google Scholar
Banner, M. L. & Peregrine, D. H. 1993 Wave breaking in deep water. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 25, 373397.Google Scholar
Belcher, S. E., Harris, J. A. & Street, R. L. 1994 Linear dynamics of turbulent air–water flow with a wavy interface. Part 3. Energy budget. J. Fluid Mech. (submitted)Google Scholar
Belcher, S. E. & Hunt, J. C. R. 1993 Turbulent shear flow over slowly moving waves. J. Fluid Mech. 251, 109148.Google Scholar
Belcher, S. E., Newley, T.M.J. & Hunt, J. C. R. 1993 The drag on an undulating surface due to the flow of a turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 249, 557596.Google Scholar
Belcher, S. E., Xu, D. P. & Hunt, J. C. R. 1990 The response of a turbulent boundary layer to arbitrarily distributed two-dimensional roughness changes. Q. J. R. Met. Soc. 116, 611635.Google Scholar
Benjamin, T. B. 1959 Shearing flow over a wavy boundary. J. Fluid Mech. 6, 161205.Google Scholar
Cheung, T.K. & Street, R. L. 1988 The turbulent layer in the water at an air–water interface. J. Fluid Mech. 194, 133151.Google Scholar
Davis, R. E. 1972 On prediction of turbulent flow over a wavy boundary. J. Fluid Mech. 52, 287306.Google Scholar
Donelan, M. A. & Hui, W. H. 1990 Mechanics of ocean surface waves. In Surface Waves and Fluxes (ed. G.L. Geernaert & W.J. Plant), pp. 209246. Kluwer.
Duin, C. A. van & Janssen, P. A. E. M. 1992 An analytical model of the generation of surface waves by turbulent air flow. J. Fluid Mech. 236, 197215.Google Scholar
Durbin, P. A. 1993 A Reynolds stress model for near-wall turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 249, 465498.Google Scholar
Gastel, K. van, Janssen, P. A. E. M. & Komen, G. J. 1985 On phase velocity and growth rate of wind-induced capillary–gravity waves. J. Fluid Mech. 161, 199216.Google Scholar
Gent, P. R. & Taylor, P. A. 1976 A numerical model of air-flow above water waves. J. Fluid Mech. 77, 105128.Google Scholar
Harris, J. A., Belcher, S. E. & Street, R. L. 1994 Linear dynamics of turbulent air–water flow with a wavy interface. Part 2. Numerical model. J. Fluid Mech. (Submitted)Google Scholar
Hasselmann, D. & Bösenberg, J. 1991 Field measurements of wave-induced pressure over wind-sea and swell. J. Fluid Mech. 230, 391428.Google Scholar
Hasselmann, K. 1962 On the nonlinear energy transfer in a gravity wave spectrum. Part 1. J. Fluid Mech. 12, 481500.Google Scholar
Hsu, C. T. & Hsu, E. Y. 1983 On the structure of turbulent flow over a progressive water wave: theory and experiement in a transformed, wave-following co-ordinate system. Part 2. J. Fluid Mech. 131, 123153.Google Scholar
Hsu, C. T., Hsu, E. Y. & Street, R. L. 1981 On the structure of turbulent flow over a progressive water wave: theory and experiement in a transformed, wave-following co-ordinate system. J. Fluid Mech. 105, 87117.Google Scholar
Hunt, J. C. R., Leibovich, S. & Richards, K.J. 1988 Turbulent shear flows over low hills. Q. J. R. Met. Soc. 114, 14351471.Google Scholar
Jacobs, S.J. 1987 An asymptotic theory for the turbulent flow over a progressive wave. J. Fluid Mech. 174, 6980.Google Scholar
Jenkins, A. D. 1987 Wind and wave induced currents in a rotating sea with depth-varying eddy viscosity J. Phys. Oceanogr. 17, 938951.Google Scholar
Kondo, J. 1976 Parameterization of turbulent transport in the top meter of the ocean. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 6, 712720.Google Scholar
Komori, S., Nagaoso, R. & Murakami, Y. 1993 Turbulence structure and mass transfer across a sheared air–water interface in wind-driven turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 249, 161183.Google Scholar
Larson, T.R. & Wright, J. W. 1975 Wind-generated gravity-capillary waves: Laboratory measurements of temporal growth rates using microwave backscatter. J. Fluid Mech. 70, 417436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, J. W. 1957 On the generation of surface waves by shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 3, 185204.Google Scholar
Phillips, O. M. 1960 On the dynamics of unsteady gravity waves of finite amplitude. Part 1. J. Fluid Mech. 9, 193217.Google Scholar
Phillips, O. M. 1977 The Dynamics of the Upper Ocean. Cambridge University Press.
Plant, W. J. 1984 A relationship between wind shear stress and wave slope. J. Geophys. Res. 87, C3, 19611967.Google Scholar
Shemdin, O. H. & Hsu, E. Y. 1967 Direct measurement of aerodynamic pressure above a simple progressive gravity wave. J. Fluid Mech. 30, 403416.Google Scholar
Snyder, R. L., Dobson, F. W., Elliot, J. A. & Long, R. B. 1981 Array measurements of atmospheric pressure fluctuations above gravity waves. J. Fluid Mech. 102, 159.Google Scholar
Sykes, R. I. 1980 An asymptotic theory of incompressible turbulent flow over a small hump. J. Fluid Mech. 101, 647670.Google Scholar
Tennekes, H. & Lumley, J. L. 1972 A First Course in Turbulence. MIT Press.
Townsend, A. A. 1972 Flow in a deep turbulent boundary layer over a surface distorted by water waves. J. Fluid Mech. 55, 719735.Google Scholar
Townsend, A. A. 1976 Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow. Cambridge University Press.
Townsend, A. A. 1980 Sheared turbulence and additional distortion. J. Fluid Mech. 98, 171191.Google Scholar
Ursell, F. 1956 Wave generation by wind. In Surveys in Mechanics (ed. G.K. Batchelor & R.M. Davis), pp. 216249. Cambridge University Press.
Valenzuela, G. R. 1976 The growth of capillary–gravity waves in a coupled shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 76, 229250.Google Scholar
WAMDI group 1988 The WAM model—a third generation ocean wave prediction model. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 18, 17751810.
Weber, J. E. & Melsom, A. 1993 Transient ocean currents induced by wind and growing waves. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 23, 193206.Google Scholar
West, B. J., Brueckner, K. A., Janda, R. S., Milder, D. M. & Milton, R. L. 1987 A new numerical model for surface hydrodynamics. J. Geophys. Res. 92, C11, 1180311824.Google Scholar
Wood, N. & Mason, P. J. 1993 The pressure force induced by neutral turbulent flow over hills. Q. J. R. Met. Soc. 119, 12331267.Google Scholar
Wu, H. Y., Hsu, E. Y. & Street, R. L. 1977 The energy transfer due to air-input, non-linear wave–wave interaction and white-cap dissipation associated with wind-generated waves. Tech. Rep. 207, pp. 1158. Stanford University.
Wu, H. Y., Hsu, E. Y. & Street, R. L. 1979 Experimental study of nonlinear wave–wave interaction and white-cap dissipation of wind-generated waves. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans 3, 5578.Google Scholar
Wu, J. 1975 Wind-induced drift currents. J. Fluid Mech. 68, 4970.Google Scholar
Zeman, O. 1981 Progress in the modelling of planetary boundary layers. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 13, 253272.Google Scholar
Zilker, D. P. & Hanratty, T. J. 1979 Influence of the amplitude of a solid wavy wall on a turbulent flow. Part 2. Separated flows. J. Fluid Mech. 90, 257271.Google Scholar